The relationship among intra-group communication, transactive memory systems, collective efficacy and team performance: A structural equation model analysis with Elite Footballers

References

• Argote, L., & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: A microfoundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1375–1382. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01077.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, D. G., Lewis, K., Kim, Y., Patel, P. C., Campion, M. C., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2019). Transactive memory systems in context: A meta-analytic examination of contextual factors in transactive memory systems development and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 464–493. doi:10.1037/apl0000329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: The Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbousson, J., & Fortes-Bourbousson, M. (2016). Fluctuations of the experience of togetherness within the team over time: Task-cohesion and shared understanding throughout a sporting regular season. Ergonomics, 60(6), 810–823. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1229041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. doi:10.1177/1094428107300343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, H. W., Lin, Y. H., & Chou, S. B. (2012). Team cognition, collective efficacy, and performance in strategic decision-making teams. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(3), 381–394. doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.3.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., & Oostenveld, W. (2010). Leadership = communication? The relations of leaders’ communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 367–380. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9140-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dithurbide, L., Sullivan, P., & Chow, G. (2009). Examining the influence of team-referent causal attributions and team performance on collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 40, 491–507. doi:10.1177/1046496409340328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho, E. (2019). Team dynamics theory: Nomological network among cohesion, team mental models, coordination, and collective efficacy. Sport Sciences for Health, 15, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s11332-018-0519-1
   Google Scholar
• Filho, E., & Tenenbaum, G. (2020). Team mental models: Theory, empirical evidence, and applied implications. In G. Tenenbaum, & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 611–631). John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119568124.ch29.
   Google Scholar
• Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G., & Yang, Y. (2015). Cohesion, team mental models, and collective efficacy: Towards an integrated framework of team dynamics in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(6), 641–653. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.957714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). Group dynamics and shared mental model development. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 309–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., Filho, E., Gershgoren, A., Brill, Y. S., Schinke, R. J., & Tenenbaum, G. (2016). Expertise in soccer teams: A thematic inquiry into the role of shared mental models within team chemistry. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 128–139. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuzé, J. P., Raimbault, N., & Fontayne, P. (2006). Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 59–68. doi:10.1080/02640410500127736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhoff, D., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2019). The influence of sample size on parameter estimates in three-level random-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1067. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lausic, D., Tennebaum, G., Eccles, D., Jeong, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Intrateam communication and performance in doubles tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 281–290. doi:10.1080/02701367.2009.10599563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, F. M., García-Calvo, T., Parejo, I., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., & Sánchez-Oliva, D. (2010). Interaction of cohesion and perceived efficacy, success expectations and performance in basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 19(1), 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, F. M., González-Ponce, I., García-Calvo, T., Sánchez-Oliva, D., & Filho, E. (2019). The relationship among cohesion, transactive memory systems, and collective efficacy in professional soccer teams: A multilevel structural equation analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 23(1), 44–56. doi:10.1037/gdn0000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, F. M., González-Ponce, I., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Pulido, J. J., & García-Calvo, T. (2018). Adaptation and validation of the Transactive Memory System Scale in Sport (TMSS-S). International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 13(6), 1015–1022. doi:10.1177/1747954118767509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587–604. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlepage, G. E., Hollingshead, A. B., Drake, L. R., & Littlepage, A. M. (2008). Transactive memory and performance in work groups: Specificity, communication, ability differences, and work allocation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(3), 223–241. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.3.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., & Zang, Z. (2010). The mediating effects of team efficacy on the relationship between a transactive memory system and team performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(7), 865–870. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.7.865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Gajardo, M. A., González-Ponce, I., Ponce-Bordón, J. C., Díaz-García, J., & Leo, F. M. (2020). Validation of the effective communication scale in Soccer. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 52, 184–192. doi:10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, M. K., & Lorimer, R. (2020). The importance of shared understanding within football teams. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 11(3), 196–210. doi:10.1080/21520704.2020.1760982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix, E., Griffith, T., & Neale, M. (2002). The phenomenology of conflict in virtual work teams. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 213–233). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2014). Teamwork in sport: A theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7(1), 229–250. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2014.932423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. D., & Spink, K. S. (2019). Member communication as network structure: Relationship with task cohesion in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(6), 764–778. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2019.1581828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2019). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it more beneficial to know what others know? Management Science, 52(5), 671–682. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumbold, J., Fletcher, D., & Daniels, K. (2020). An experience sampling study of organizational stress processes and future playing time in professional sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(5), 559–567. doi:10.1080/02640414.2020.1717302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryba, T. V., Stambulova, N. B., Si, G., & Schinke, R. J. (2013). ISSP Position Stand: culturally competent research and practice in sport and exercise psychology. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(2), 123–142. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2013.779812
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Rico, R., Gil, F., & Martín, S. (2006). Transactive memory in decision-making teams: Implications for team effectiveness. Psicothema, 18, 750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. J., & Short, S. (2011). Further operationalization of intra-team communication in sports: An updated version of the Scale of Effective Communication in Team Sports (SECTS-2). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 471–487. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, G., & Gershgoren, L. (2011). Conclusions and recommendations: Toward a comprehensive framework of evidenced-based practice with performers. In J. K. Luiselli & D. D. Reed (Eds.), Behavioral sport psychology (pp. 249–262). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., & Cox, R. (2014). Distributed cognition in sports teams: Explaining successful and expert performance. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46, 640–654. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.779215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar