1,120
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
BIOMECHANICS AND MOTOR CONTROL

Fatigue related changes in rearfoot eversion: a means of functionally grouping runners?

ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersen, J. J. (2019). The State of Running 2019. Retrieved 28 June 2021, from https://runrepeat.com/state-of-running.
  • Bishop, C., Arnold, J. B., Fraysse, F., Thewlis, D. (2015). A method to investigate the effect of shoe-hole size on surface marker movement when describing in-shoe joint kinematics using a multi-segmental foot model. Gait & Posture, 41, 295–299.
  • Borg, G. (1998). Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA.
  • Brüggeman, G.-P. (1996). Influence of fatigue on lower extremity function. ISBS Conference Proceedings Archie 1. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/2666.
  • Cheung, R. T. H., & Ng, G. Y. F. (2007). Efficacy of motion control shoes for reducing excessive rearfoot motion in fatigued runners. Physical Therapy in Sport, 8, 75–81.
  • Christina, K., White, S., & Gilchrist, L. (2001). Effect of localized muscle fatigue on vertical ground reaction forces and ankle joint motion during running. Human Movement Science, 20, 257–276.
  • Clermont, C. A., Benson, L. C., Edwards, W. B., Hettinga, B.A., & Ferber, R. (2019). New considerations for wearable technology data: Changes in running biomechanics during a marathon. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 35, 401–409.
  • Derrick, T., Dereu, D., & McLean, S. (2002). Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34, 998–1002.
  • Dierks, T., Davis, I., & Hamill, J. (2010). The effects of running in an exerted state on lower extremity kinematics and joint timing. Journal of Biomechanics, 43, 2993–2998.
  • Ferber, R., Hreljac, A., & Kendall, K. (2009). Suspected mechanisms in the cause of overuse running injuries. Sports Health, 1, 242–246.
  • Halilaj, E., Rajagopal, A., Fiterau, M., Hicks, J.L., Hastie, T.J., & Delp, S.L. (2018). Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls and new opportunities. Journal of Biomechanics, 81, 1–11.
  • Hoerzer, S., von Tascharner, V., Jacob, C., & Nigg, B.M. (2015). Defining functional groups based on running kinematics using self-organizing maps and support vector machines. Journal of Biomechanics, 48, 2072–2079.
  • Hreljac, A. (2004). Impact and overuse injuries in runners. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 845–849.
  • Hulteen, R. M., Smith, J. J., Morgan, P. J., Barnett, L.M., Hallal, P.C., Colyvas, K., & Lubans, D.R. (2017). Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 95, 14–25.
  • Jefferys, R. (2021). New partnership with world athletics. Retrieved 28 June 2021, https://www.parkrun.com/blog/news/2020/06/29/new-partnership-with-world-athletics/.
  • Jones, A. M., & Doust, J. H. (1996). A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. Journal of Sports Sciences, 14, 321–327.
  • Jones, A. M., Wilkerson, D. P., DiMenna, F., Fulford, J., & Poole, D.C. (2008). Muscle metabolic responses to exercise above and below the “critical power” assessed using 31P-MRS. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 294, R585–R593.
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 24, 863.
  • Langley, B., Cramp, M., Morisasu, K., Nishiwaki, T., & Morrison, S.C. (2015). Multi-segmental foot modelling during shod activity: Study of running shoe integrity. Footwear Science, 7, S144–S145.
  • Lee, D.-C., Pate, R. R., Lavie, C. J., Sui, X., Church, T. S., & Blair, S.N. (2014). Leisure-time running reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 64, 472–481.
  • Lilley, K., Stiles, V., & Dixon, S. (2013). The influence of motion control shoes on the running gait of mature and young females. Gait & Posture, 37, 331–335.
  • Maurer, C., Federolf, P., von Tscharner, V., Stirling, L., & Nigg, B.M. (2012). Discrimination of gender-, speed-, and shoe-dependent movement patterns in runners using full-body kinematics. Gait & Posture, 36, 40–45.
  • Nigg, B. M., Baltich, J., Hoerzer, S., & Enders, H. (2015). Running shoes and running injuries: Mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: ‘preferred movement path’ and ‘comfort filter’. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 49, 1290–1294.
  • Nigg, B. M., Mohr, M., & Nigg, S. R. (2017). Muscle tuning and preferred movement path – a paradigm shift. Current Issues in Sport Science, 2, 1-12.
  • Pataky, T. (2019). SPM1D One- and two-sample tests. http://www.spm1d.org/doc/Stats1D/onetwosample.html.
  • Pedregosa, F., Varpquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011(12), 28825–22830.
  • Trudeau, M. B., Willwacher, S., Weir, G., Rohr, E., Ertel, C., Brüggemann, G.P., & Hamill, J. (2019). A novel method for estimating an individual’s deviation from their habitual motion path when running. Footwear Science, 11, 135–145.
  • Van Gent, R. N., Siem, D., Van Middeloop, M., van Os, A., Bierma-Zeinstra, S.M.A., & Koes, B.W. (2007). Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41, 469–480.
  • Weir, G., Jewell, C., Wyatt, H., Trudeau, M.B., Rohr, E., Brüggemann, G.P., & Hamill, J. (2018). The influence of prolonged running and footwear on lower extremity biomechanics. Footwear Science, 11, 1–11.
  • Willwacher, S., Mählich, D., Trudeau, M. B., Hamill, J., Weir, G., Brüggemann, G.P., & Bratke, G. (2020). The habitual motion path theory: Evidence from cartilage volume reductions in the knee joint after 75 min of running. Scientific Reports, 10, 1363.
  • Willwacher, S., Sanno, M., & Brüggemann, G. P. (2020). Fatigue matters: An intense 10 km run alters frontal and transverse plane joint kinematics in competitive and recreational adult runners. Gait & Posture, 76, 277–283.