Tracking for peace: Assessing the effectiveness of Track Two Diplomacy in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

REFERENCES

• Agha, H. G., Feldman, S., Khālidī, A., & Schiff, Z. (2003). Track II Diplomacy: Lessons from the Middle East. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, E. E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict:Theory and cases. Aldershot:Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-On, D. (2008). The others within us: Constructing Jewish–Israeli identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 63–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J. W., & Sandole, D. J. (1986). Generic theory: The basis of conflict resolution. Negotiation Journal, 2, 333–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chataway, C. (1998). Track Two Diplomacy: from Track 1 perspective. Negotiation Journal, 14, 269–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. (2003). Intractable conflict. In D.Morton, P.Coleman, & E.Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 533–558). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, W., & Montville, J. (1982). Foreign policy according to Freud. Foreign Policy, 45, 145–157.
   Google Scholar
• d'Estree, T. P., & Babbitt, E. (1998). Women and the art of peacemaking: Data from Israeli-Palestinian interactive problem-solving workshops. Political Psychology, 19, 185–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1993). Developing the field of interactive conflict resolution: Issues in training, funding and institutionalization. Political Psychology, 14, 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. (1997). Interactive conflict resolution (pp. 5–77). New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J. (2009–2010). Challenges of power asymmetry and justice for problem-solving workshops. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 3, 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. ([1967]2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kellen, D., Bekerman, Z., & Maoz, I. (2012). An easy coalition. The peacecamp identity and Israeli-Palestinian Track Two Diplomacy. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Epub, 9, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1972). The problem-solving workshop in conflict resolution. In R. L.Merritt (Ed.), Communication in international politics (pp. 168–204). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. C., & Cohen, S. P. (1976). The problem-solving workshop: A social-psychological contribution to the resolution of international conflicts. Journal of Peace Research, 13, 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1991). Interactive problem solving: The uses and limits of a therapeutic model for the resolution of international conflicts. The Psychodynamics of International Relationships, 2, 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1995). Contributions of an unofficial conflict resolution effort to the Israeli-Palestinian Breakthrough. Negotiation Journal, 11, 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1998). Social–psychological Contributions to Peacemaking and Peacebuilding in the Middle East. Applied Psychology, 47, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2000). The Role of the Scholar–Practitioner in International Conflict Resolution. International Studies Perspectives, 1, 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2001). The role of national identity in conflict resolution: Experiences from Israeli–Palestinian problem-solving workshops. In R. D.Ashmore, L.Jussim, & D.Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 187–212). Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2002). Interactive problem solving as a tool for second track diplomacy. In J.Davies & E.Kaufman (Eds.), Second track/citizens' diplomacy (pp. 81–105). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2003). On line interview with Prof. Kelman. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/audio/herbert_kelman/?nid = 2452.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2005). Building trust among enemies: The central challenge for international conflict resolution. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 639–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2007). Social–psychological dimensions of international conflict. In I. W.Zartman & J. L.Rasmussen (Eds.), Peacemaking in international conflict: Methods and techniques (pp. 61–107). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (2010). Interactive problem solving: Changing political culture in the pursuit of conflict resolution. Peace and Conflict, 16, 389–413.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, J. H. (2000). The autonomy dilemma of Track Two Diplomacy, in southern Asia. Security Dialogue, 31, 343–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesbreg, L. (2001). Mediation and the transformation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 373–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, L. (2009). Changing conflict asymmetries constructively. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 2, 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, I. (2010). Asymmetric struggle for the hearts and minds of viewers: Can the media actually trigger sympathy towards terrorists?Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 3, 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, I. (2011). Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, I., & McCauley, C. (2005). Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish-Israeli attitudes toward solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology, 26, 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, I., & McCauley, C. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. (2002). Head-first versus feet-first in peace education. In G.Salomon & B.Nevo (Eds.), The nature and study of peace education (pp. 247–258). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2001). From controlled communication to problem solving: The origins of facilitated conflict resolution. International Journal of Peace Studies, 6, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. (2009). Persuading lions: Problems of transferring insights from track-two exercises undertaken in conditions of asymmetry. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 2, 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (2009). Escalation and de-escalation in asymmetric conflict. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 2, 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, Y., & Maoz, I. (2013). Dangerous stories: Encountering narratives of the other in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 281.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, Y., & Maoz, I. (in press). Peacemaking through dialogue? Effects of intergroup-dialogue on perceptions regarding the resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, Y., Maoz, I., & Bekerman, Z. (2010). Dialogue and ideology: The effect of continuous involvement in Jewish-Arab dialogue encounters on the ideological perspectives of Israeli-Jews. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 571–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. (1995). The dynamics of joint thinking between adversaries in international conflict: Phases of the continuing problem-solving workshop. Political Psychology, 16, 321–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N. (2000). Interactive conflict resolution: Issues in theory, methodology and evaluation. In P.Stern & D.Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 294–337). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhana, N., & Bar, Tal, D. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable ethnonational conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 53, 761–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, H. (2000). Interactive conflict resolution: A view for policy makers on making and building peace. In P.Stern & D.Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 251–293). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.Worchel & W. G.Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar