Fighting together? understanding bilateral cooperation in the realm of counterterrorism

References

• Abrahms, M. (2006). Why terrorism does not work. International Security, 31(2), 42–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahms, M. (2008). What terrorists really want: Terrorist motives and counterterrorism strategy. International Security, 32(4), 78–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahms, M. (2012). The political effectiveness of terrorism revisited. Comparative Political Studies, 45(3), 366–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, W. (1999). Social theory of international politics. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arce, D. G., & Sandler, T. (2005). Counterterrorism: A game-theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(2), 183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archick, K. (2012). US-EU cooperation against terrorism. Washington, DC: Congretional Research Serivce.
   Google Scholar
• Asal, V. H., Karl Rethemeyer, R., Anderson, I., Stein, A., Rizzo, J., & Rozea, M. (2009). The softest of targets: A study on terrorist target selection. Journal of Applied Security Research, 4(3), 258–278.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D., & Simon, S. (2003). The age of sacred terror: Radical Islam’s war against America. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Bensahel, N. (2003). The counterterror coalitions: Cooperation with Europe, NATO and the European union. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Bossong, R. (2012). The evolution of EU counterterrorism: European security policy after 9/11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. Q., Matthew, C., & Christopher, H. (2012). Multilateral cooperation and the prevention of nuclear terrorism: Pragmatism over idealism. International Affairs, 88(2), 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, P. T., & Sandler, T. (2010). What do transnational terrorists target? Has it changed? Are we safer? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(2), 214–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremer, L. P. (2001). A new strategy for the new face of terrorism. National Interest, 65, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2010). The European union, counter terrorism and police co-operation, 1992–2007: Unsteady foundations? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno De Mesquita, E. (2005). The quality of terror. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bures, O. (2008). Europol’s fledgling counterterrorism role. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(4), 498–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byman, D. (1998). The logic of ethnic terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 21(2), 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Byman, D. (2006). Remaking Alliances for the war on terrorism. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), 767–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 363–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capie, D. (2004). Between a hegemon and a hard place: The ‘war on terror’ and southeast Asian-US relations. Pacific Review, 17(2), 223–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, R., Jeffrey, F., & Ronald, J. (1993). World trade and payments: An introduction. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Cederman, L.-E., & Girardin, L. (2007). Beyond fractionalization: Mapping ethnicity onto nationalist insurgencies. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. G., & Drury, A. C. (2006). Democratic sanctions: Connecting the democratic peace and economic sanctions. Journal of Peace Research, 43(6), 709–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crelinsten, R. (1989). Terrorism and international cooperation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crelinsten, R. (2009). Counterterrorism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M. (2001). Counterterrorism policy and the political process. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 24(5), 329–337.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M. 2007. “The debate over “new” vs. “old” terrorism,” presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, August 30-September 2, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, A. K. (2006). How al-Qaida ends: The decline and demise of terrorist groups. International Security, 31(1), 7–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, S. J., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965. In B. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers (pp. 19–48). Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Mesquita, B. B., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. (1999). An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 791–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, G., David, R., & Randolph, S. (1986). Arms races and cooperation. In K. Oye (Ed.), Cooperation under anarchy (pp. 118–146). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, C. J. M. (1998). The role of ideology in terrorists’ target selection. Terrorism and Political Violence, 10(2), 53–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchâtel, M., & Ekman, A. (2015). Countering terrorism: An area for EU-China cooperation? Paris, France: European Union, Institute of Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, M., & Wehrey, F. (2014). U.S.-Arab counterterrorism cooperation in a region ripe for extremism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, I. (2004). How new is the new terrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 27(5), 439–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2000). Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(3), 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2006). The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52(2), 269–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. (2018). Cooperation, conflict, and the costs of Anarchy. International Organization, 72(3), 523–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., Lango, P., Laegreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2013). After Oslo and Utøya: A shift in the balance between security and liberty in Norway? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(10), 839–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley, M. G., Piazza, J. A., & Young, J. K. (2012). Games rivals play: Terrorism in international rivalries. Journal of Politics, 74(1), 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, F. (2009). The expansion of intelligence agency mandates: British counter-terrorism in comparative perspective. Review of International Studies, 35(4), 983–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2005). The politics of warning: Terrorism and risk communication. Intelligence and National Security, 20(3), 379–418.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, J. (2008). Fighting Terrorism and Drugs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gadarian, S. K. (2010). The politics of threat: How terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 469–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, E. (2007). The capitalist peace. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 166–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibler, D. M. (2009). International military alliances, 1648-2008. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. H. (2001). NATO after September 11. Survival, 43(4), 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegemannm, H. (2015). International counterterrorism bureaucracies in the United Nations and the European Union. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. (2004). The changing face of Al Qaeda and the global war on terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 27, 549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside Terrorism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2011). Terrorism studies: A reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, A., Hornsey, M. J., Vanman, E. J., Esposo, S., & Ale, S. (2015). Fight and flight: Evidence of aggressive capitulation in the face of fear messages from terrorists. Political Psychology, 36(6), 631–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M. D. (1991). Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. Journal Of Political Science, 35(4), 904–933.
   Google Scholar
• Justin, C., & James, W. (2014). International cooperation, spoiling, and transnational terrorism. International Interactions, 40, 453–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattelman, K. T. (2016). Testing the prisoners’ dilemma of counterterrorism: An aggregate analysis of counterterrorist efforts from 2001 to 2010. Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(4), 583–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (2003). Same war: Different views: Germany, Japan, and counterterrorism. International Organization, 57(4), 731–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenneth, W. (1979). The theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, M. (2003). From Pablo to Osama: Counter-terrorism lessons from the war on drugs. Survival, 45(3), 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, O. R., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security, 20(1), 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, D. J. (2005). Countering global insurgency. Journal of Strategic Studies, 28(4), 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, T., & Meierrieks, D. (2011). What causes terrorism? Public Choice, 147(1–2), 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, B., & Reiter, D. (2000). Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(2), 203–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A., & Powell, R. (1999). Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laqueur, W. (1999). The new terrorism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leeds, B. A., Ritter, J. M., McLaughlin Mitchell, S., & Long, A. G. (2002). Alliance treaty obligations and provisions, 1815-1944. International Interactions, 28, 237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeds, B. A., & Savun, B. (2007). Terminating alliances: Why do states abrogate agreements? Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1118–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, S. (2003). The difficulties and dilemmas of international intelligence cooperation. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 16(4), 527–542.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, I. O., Hoffman, B., Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D., Zanini, M., & Jenkins, B. M. (1999). Countering the new terrorism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E. (Ed.). (2018). Deterring terrorism: A model for strategic deterrence. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, A. C., McDermott, R., & Petersen, M. B. (2011). States in mind: Evolution, coalitional psychology, and international politics. International Security, 36(2), 48–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z., & Bruce, R. (1993). Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. The American Political Science Review, 87(3), 624–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z., & Henderson, E. A. (2013). The world religion dataset, 1945-2010: Logic, estimates, and trends. International Interactions, 39(3), 265–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., & Jaggers, K. 2013. POLITY IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2013. Retrieved from http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994 /1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. O. (2009). International terrorism as a force of homogenization? A constructivist approach to understanding cross-national threat perceptions and responses. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(4), 647–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2007). Common threat and common response? The European Union’s counter-terrorism strategy and its problems. Government and Opposition, 42(3), 292–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, M. (2009). The social market roots of democratic peace. International Security, 33(4), 52–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. (2005a). Six rather unusual propositions about terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(4), 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. (2005b). Simplicity and spook: Terrorism and the dynamics of threat exaggeration. International Studies Perspectives, 6(2), 208–234.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Wille, B. (2008). The effect of International terrorism on EU Intelligence co-operation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), 49–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munroe, H. D. (2009). The October crisis revisited: Counterterrorism as strategic choice, political result, and organizational practice. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 288–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussarat, J., & Ishtiaq, C. A. (2013). Role of SAARC for countering terrorism in south Asia. South Asian Studies, 28(2), 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). 2014. Global Terrorism Database [August 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.
   Google Scholar
• Nesi, G. (2006). International cooperation in counter-terrorism: The United Nations and regional organizations in the fight against terrorism. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie‑ White, T. (2006). Non proliferation and counter terrorism cooperation in southeast Asia: Meeting global obligations through regional security architectures? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 28(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M., & Richard, Z. (1966). An economic theory of alliances. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 266–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omelicheva, M. Y. (2007). Combating terrorism in central Asia: Explaining differences in states’ responses to terror. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19(3), 369–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19(2), 87–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oye, K. (ed). (1986). Cooperation under anarchy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perliger, A. (2012). How democracies respond to terrorism: Regime characteristics, symbolic power and counterterrorism. Security Studies, 21(3), 490–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, C. (1994). EU counterterrorism, the maastricht third pillar, and liberal democratic acceptability. Terrorism and Political Violence, 6(2), 103–145.
   Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C., Nordstrom, T., & Warnke, K. (2004). The COW-2 international organizations dataset version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J. (2015). What is a terrorist group? Conceptual issues and empirical implications. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(2), 225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J. (in press). Do 90 percent of terrorist groups last less than a year? Updating the conventional wisdom. Terrorism and Political Violence.
   Google Scholar
• Price, B. C. (2012). Targeting top terrorists: How leadership capitation contributes to counterterrorism. International Security, 36(4), 9–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, B. C. (in press). Terrorism as cancer: How to combat an incurable disease.Terrorism and Political Violence.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Vreeland, J. R. (2002). A statistical model of bilateral cooperation. Political Analysis, 10(2), 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, W., & Richard, A. J. (2005). Contending cultures of counterterrorism: Transatlantic divergence or convergence? International Affairs, 81(5), 905–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reveron, S. D. (2008). Counterterrorism and intelligence cooperation. Journal of Global Change and Governance, 1(33), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, A., & Keohane, O. R. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions,” World Politics, 38(1), 226–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaniuk, P. (2010). Multilateral counter-terrorism: The global politics of cooperation and contestation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sageman, M. (2008). Leaderless Jihad: Terror networks in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sageman, M. (2017). Turning to political violence: The emergence of terrorism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A. (2005). Terrorism as psychological warfare. Democracy and Security, 1(2), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A. 2014. Al-Qaeda’s “Single Narrative” and attempts to develop counter narratives: The state of knowledge. The Hague ICCT Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A. (2016). The way forward on counter-terrorism: Global perspectives. Strathmore Law Journal, 49, 49–73.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, A., & Crelinsten, R. D. (1992). Western responses to terrorism: A twenty‐five year balance sheet. Terrorism and Political Violence, 4(4), 307–340.
   Google Scholar
• Silke, A. (2008). Research on terrorism. Terrorism Informatics, 18, 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, S. J., & Antonius, D. (eds.). (2013). The political psychology of terrorism fears. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Zeigler, S. M. (Forthcoming). Terrorism before and after 9/11 – A more dangerous world? Research and Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, G. H. (1984). The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics, 36, 461–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. K. (2006). Compliance with international law: International law on terrorism at the United Nations. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(2), 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 2014. SIPRI military expenditure database, 1988-2013. Retrieved from http://www.spiri.org.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, K., & Fritz, P. (2004). Jumping on the bandwagon: An interest-based explanation for great power alliances. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 428–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, S. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Terrorism, conflict and (O)ther discursive formations. Sociological Research Online, 13(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoroff, J. (2005). The mind of the terrorist: A review and critique of psychological approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1), 3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, N. J. (2002). Dying for `enduring freedom’: Accepting responsibility for civilian casualties in the war against terrorism. International Relations, 16(2), 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, P. (2006). Terrorism versus democracy: The liberal state response. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., Cederman, L.-E., & Min, B. (2009). Ethnic politics and armed conflict. A configurational analysis of a new global dataset. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 316–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014. World development indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. 2005. “Uzbeks stop working with U.S. against terrorism,” Washington post, Section A-14. Accessed via Lexis-Nexis Academic.
   Google Scholar