FinTech, terrorism-related fund transfers and behavioural finance

References

• Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. Dunning, & J. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. V. (2010). Detecting anchoring in financial markets. Journal of Behavioural Finance, 11, 129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., & Zastawniak, T. (2017). Glamour, value and anchoring on the changing P/E. European Journal of Finance, 23, 375–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2016). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47, 1271–1320.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Dellaert, B. (2018). Regulating robo-advice across the financial services industry. Iowa Law Review, 103, 713–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantekas, I. (2003). The international law of terrorist financing. American Journal of International Law, 97, 315–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile, M. (2004). Going to the source: Why Al Qaeda’s financial network is likely to withstand the current war on terrorist financing. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 27, 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biais, B., Hilton, D., Mazurier, K., & Pouget, S. (2005). Judgmental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 287–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., Liberman, V., & Tversky, A. (1996). Overconfidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination. organizational behavior and human decision processes, 65, 212–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broihanne, M. H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behaviour of finance professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bures, O. (2012). Private actors in the fight against terrorist financing: Efficiency versus effectiveness. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 35, 712–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bures, O. (2015). Ten years of EU’s fight against terrorist financing: A critical assessment. Intelligence and National Security, 30, 207–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew, R., & Demos, T. (2015, April 16). China’s lufax valued at nearly $10 billion in recent funding round. Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Cen, L., Gilles, H., & Wei, K. C. J. (2013). The role of anchoring bias in the equity market: Evidence from analysts’ earnings forecasts and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48, 47–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. Y., Solomon, D. H., & Westerfield, M. M. (2016). Looking for someone to blame: Delegation, cognitive dissonance, and the disposition effect. The Journal of Finance, 71, 267–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. P. (2018). An overview of current trends in terrorism and illicit finance: Lessons from the Islamic state in Iraq and Syria and other emerging threats. Testimony presented before the House Financial Services Committee, Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance on September 7, 2018. RAND Corporation CT498, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Clunan, A. L. (2006). The fight against terrorist financing. Political Science Quarterly, 121, 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNBC. (2018, May 29). China’s ant financial raises $10 billion at $150 billion valuation: Sources.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, K. D., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. The Journal of Finance, 53, 1839–1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, 40, 793–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2017). FinTech by the numbers. New York, NY: The Deloitte Center for Financial Services.
   Google Scholar
• Dickler, J., & Epperson, S. (2018, March 3). Digital wallets are safe but Americans remain wary. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: CNBC.
   Google Scholar
• Didenko, A. (2018). Regulating FinTech: Lessons from Africa. San Diego International Law Journal, 19, 311–370.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ernst & Young. (2019). Global FinTech adoption index 2019. New York, NY: EY Global Financial Services.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner-Röhling, G., & Krügel, S. (2014). Judgemental overconfidence and trading activity. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 107, 827–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, S., Haugen, R., & Makhija, A. (1988). Predicting contemporary volume with historic volume at differential price levels: Evidence supporting the disposition effect. Journal of Finance, 43, 677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes. (2019, February 4). FinTech 50: The most innovative FinTech companies in 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (2011). The sources of terrorist financing: Theory and typology. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34, 461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., & Weber, M. (2007). Overconfidence and trading volume. Geneva Risk Insurance Review, 32, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzmann, W., & Peles, N. (1997). Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Research, 20, 145–158.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M. D. (2015). Overconfident consumers in the marketplace. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. (1978). Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. American Economic Review, 68(2), 223–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joaristi, M., Serra, E., & Spezzano, F. (2019). Detecting suspicious entities in offshore leaks networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 9, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). Intuitive prediction, biases and corrective procedures. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp.414–421). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Knetch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauflin, J. (2019, February 4). The 11 biggest FinTech companies in America 2019. Jersey City, NJ: Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Keatinge, T., & Danner, K. (2019). Assessing innovation in terrorist financing. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–18. Forthcoming. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1559516
   Google Scholar
• Knutson, B., Wimmer, G., Rick, S., Hollon, N., Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Neural antecedents of the endowment effect. Neuron, 58, 814–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, I., & Yusef, A. (2019). How do terrorist organisations make money? Terrorist funding and innovation in the case of al-Shabaab. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1–23. Forthcoming. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1628622
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenstein, R. (2000). When genius failed: The rise and fall of long term capital management. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D. N., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1985). Animals’ choices over uncertain outcomes: Some initial experimental results. American Economic Review, 75, 597–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D. N., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. (1991). Animals’ choices over uncertain outcomes: Further experimental results. Economic Journal, 101, 1067–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, R., & Sandler, T. (2014). Remittances and terrorism: A global analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 25, 331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, B. (2008). Re-regulating offshore finance? Geography Compass, 2, 155–175.
   Google Scholar
• Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A. (2019, August 9). Banks near zero hour on $124 trillion of flows. New York, NY: Bloomberg Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realise losses? Journal of Finance, 80, 1775–1798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odean, T. (1999). Do investors trade too much? American Economic Review, 89, 1279–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passas, N., & Jones, K. (2006). Commodities and terrorist financing: Focus on diamonds. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. J. (2019). Foreign terrorist organisation designation, international cooperation and terrorism. International Interactions, 45, 316–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. J. (2009). Applying portfolio theory to the analysis of terrorism: Computing the set of attack method combinations from which the rational terrorist group will choose in order to maximise injuries and fatalities. Defence and Peace Economics, 20, 193–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. J., & Pohl, G. (2014). Prospect theory and terrorist choice. Journal of Applied Economics, 17, 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. J., & Pohl, G. (2017). Terrorist choice: A stochastic dominance and prospect theory analysis. Defence and Peace Economics, 28, 150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. J., & Pohl, G. (2020). How terrorism red flags become weak signals through the processes of judgement and evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35, 377–388.
   Google Scholar
• Raphaeli, N. (2003). Financing of terrorism: Sources, methods and channels. Terrorism and Political Violence, 15, 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richterova, D. (2018). The anxious host: Czechoslovakia and Carlos the Jackal 1978–1986. International History Review, 40, 108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. (2019). Seychelles: Prospects, probity and legacy, governance under transnational pressures. Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 108, 307–326.
   Google Scholar
• Romaniuk, P. (2014). The state of the art on the financing of terrorism. RUSI Journal, 159, 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, K. (2019, July 24). Betterment faces questions from regulator after launching checking and savings accounts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: CNBC.
   Google Scholar
• Salami, I. (2018). Terrorism financing with virtual currencies: Can regulatory technology solutions combat this? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 41, 968–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 40, 777–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (2000). Behavioural portfolio theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley, L. I., & Picarelli, J. T. (2002). Methods not motives: Implications of the convergence of international organised crime and terrorism. Police Practice and Research, 3, 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review, 71, 421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioural decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statman, M., Thorley, S., & Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. Review of Financial Studies, 19, 1531–1565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, K. D. (2011). Tackling threat finance: A labour for hercules or sisyphus. Parameters, 41, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skilful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 94, 143–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teichmann, F. M. (2019). Recent trends in money laundering and terrorism financing. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 27, 2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 1, 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1999a). The end of behavioural finance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1999b). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12, 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2016). Misbehaving: The making of behavioural economics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, C. (2019). Cryptoterrorism: Assessing the utility of blockchain technologies for terrorist enterprise. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 1–24. Forthcoming. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1531565
   Google Scholar
• Winer, J. M., & Roule, T. J. (2002). Fighting terrorist finance. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 44, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Zdanowicz, J. S. (2004). Detecting money laundering and terrorist financing via data mining. Communications of the ACM, 47, 53–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdanowicz, J. S. (2009). Trade-based money laundering and terrorist financing. Review of Law and Economics, 5, 855–878.
   Google Scholar