A Schlemm’s canal scaffold for the treatment of elevated IOP

References

• Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1367–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanakis VV, Chan MP, Foster PJ, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and metaanalysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunger BM, Fuchshofer R, Tamm ER. The aqueous humor outflow pathways in glaucoma: a unifying concept of disease mechanisms and causative treatment. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;95(Pt B):173–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109(8):1090–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1573–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razeghinejad MR, Fudemberg SJ, Spaeth GL. The changing conceptual basis of trabeculectomy: a review of past and current surgical techniques. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(1):1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholkar K, Trinh HM, Pal D, et al. Discovery of novel inhibitors for the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10(3):293–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidl D, Schmetterer L, Garhofer G, et al. Pharmacotherapy of glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015;31(2):63–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Williams A, Waisbourd M, et al. Stem cell therapy for glaucoma: science or snake oil? Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(2):93–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CA, Kaufman PL. Exciting directions in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(6):534543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JC. Medication adherence in glaucoma: approaches for optimizing patient compliance. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(2):190–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadway DC, Cate H. Pharmacotherapy and adherence issues in treating elderly patients with glaucoma. Drugs Aging. 2015;32(7):569–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SooHoo JR, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current implants and future innovations. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(6):528–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed II. MIGS and the FDA: what’s in a name? Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1737–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacca SC, Gandolfi S, Bagnis A, et al. The outflow pathway: a tissue with morphological and functional unity. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:1876–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspelund A, Tammela T, Antila S, et al. The Schlemm’s canal is a VEGF-C/VEGFR-3-responsive lymphatic-like vessel. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3975–3986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautriche CN, Tian Y, Xie Y, et al. A closer look at Schlemm’s canal cell physiology: implications for biomimetics. J Funct Biomater. 2015;6(3):963–985.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karpinich NO, Caron KM. Schlemm’s canal: more than meets the eye, lymphatics in disguise. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3701–3703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Unique origin of eye canal combines elements of blood, lymph tube development. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(7):e1001913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone MA, Grant WG. Pressure-dependent changes in structures of the aqueous outflow system of human and monkey eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75(3):365–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Farsiu S, Chiu SJ, et al. Pilocarpine-induced dilation of Schlemm’s canal and prevention of lumen collapse at elevated intraocular pressures in living mice visualized by OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(6):3737–3746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista SA, Lu Z, Hofmann S, et al. Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5346–5352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(3):316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieshaber MC, Peckar C, Pienaar A, et al. Long-term results of up to 12 years of over 700 cases of viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(4):362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Shaarawy T. Update on Schlemm’s canal based procedures. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(1):38–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khaimi MA. Canaloplasty: a minimally invasive and maximally effective glaucoma treatment. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:485065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieshaber MC, Stegmann R, Grieshaber HR, et al. Novel device for expanding Schlemm’s canal: a morphological study: Implantation of the Stegmann Canal Expander following viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal resulted in permanent expansion of the canal lumen and distension of the trabecular meshwork without complications. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(7):875–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleman LS, Motzkin SM, Alicandri FP, et al. Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as an implant material. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10(5):695–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy J, Khalil S. Five-year hearing results with the shape memory nitinol stapes prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(11):2591–2593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosli C, Schmid P, Huber AM. Biocompatibility of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(2):265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmagkiolis K, Hakeem A, Choksi N, et al. 12-Month primary patency rates of contemporary endovascular device therapy for femoro-popliteal occlusive disease in 6,024 patients: beyond balloon angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84(4):555–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayan M, Chun Y. An overview of thin film nitinol endovascular devices. Acta Biomater. 2015;21:20–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, et al. Temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND): a novel, minimally invasive treatment for relief of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): feasibility, safety and functional results at 1 year of follow-up. BJU Int. 2015;116(2):278–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiyer A, Russell NA, Pelletier MH, et al. The impact of nitinol staples on the compressive forces, contact area, and mechanical properties in comparison to a claw plate and crossed screws for the first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9(3):232–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nespoli A, Dallolio V, Villa E, et al. A new design of a nitinol ring-like wire for suturing in deep surgical field. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;56:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assad M, Chernyshov A, Leroux MA, et al. A new porous titanium-nickel alloy: part 1. cytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation. Biomed Mater Eng. 2002;12(3):225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider W, Munroe N. Assessment of corrosion resistance and metal ion leaching of nitinol alloys. J Mater Eng Perform. 2011;20(4):812–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson E, Nash DH, Dempster WM. On the experimental testing of fine nitinol wires for medical devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(3):261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya SA. Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of nitinol as an implant material. Biomed Mater Eng. 2002;12(1):69–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JL, Velez-Montoya R, Erlanger M. Ocular biocompatibility of nitinol intraocular clips. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(1):354–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grierson I, Saheb H, Kahook MY, et al. A novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold: histologic observations. JGlaucoma. 2015;24(6):460–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya S, Anderegg J, Van Humbeeck J. Critical overview of nitinol surfaces and their modifications for medical applications. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(3):447–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya SA, Tian H, Anderegg JW, et al. The influence of surface oxides on the distribution and release of nickel from nitinol wires. Biomaterials. 2009;30(4):468–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camras LJ, Yuan F, Fan S, et al. A novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold increases outflow facility in a human anterior segment perfusion model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(10):6115–6121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati V, Fan S, Hays CL, et al. A novel 8-mm Schlemm’s canal scaffold reduces outflow resistance in a human anterior segment perfusion model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):1698–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone MA, Saheb H, Ahmed II, et al. Effects of a Schlemm’ canal scaffold on collector channel ostia in human anterior segments. Exp Eye Res. 2014;119:70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit BA, Johnstone MA. Effects of viscoelastic injection into Schlemm’s canal in primate and human eyes: potential relevance to viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(4):786–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Schieber AT, Camras LJ, et al. Mathematical modeling of outflow facility increase with trabecular meshwork bypass and Schlemm canal dilation. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(4):355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA approves first glaucoma stent for use with cataract surgery. [updated 2012]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm309667.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wellik SR, Dale EA. A review of the iStent((R)) trabecular micro-bypass stent: safety and efficacy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:677–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays CL, Gulati V, Fan S, et al. Improvement in outflow facility by two novel microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(3):1893–1900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Cha E, Gorantla V, et al. Characterization of aqueous humor outflow through novel glaucoma devices – A tracer study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:3743.
   Google Scholar
• Sameulson T, Tetz M, Pfeiffer N, et al. One year results of an intracanalicular microstent for IOP reduction in open angle glaucoma. 117th Annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Tetz M, Pfeiffer N, Ramirez M, et al. 12 Month results from a prospective multicenter study of nickel titanium Schlemm’s canal microstent for IOP reduction after cataract surgery in open angle glaucoma. In: 30th Congress of European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery; 2012 Sep; Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, et al. A randomized trial of a Schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1283–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American national standards institute. ANSI Z80.27 Ophthalmics: Implantable Glaucoma Devices. Available from: http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=ANSI%20Z80.27-2014
   Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Consolandi G, Pignata G, et al. A comparison of endothelial cell loss in combined cataract and MIGS (Hydrus) procedure to phacoemulsification alone: 6-month results. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:769289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hau S, Barton K. Corneal complications of glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(2):131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EK, Yun YJ, Lee JE, et al. Changes in corneal endothelial cells after ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(3):361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo JW, Lee JY, Nam DH, et al. Comparison of the changes in corneal endothelial cells after pars plana and anterior chamber ahmed valve implant. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:486832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ike K, Ahmed M. Intracanalicular scaffold for IOP reduction with cataract surgery in mild to moderate open angle glaucoma. [updated 2012]. Available from: http://www.ivantisinc.com/pdf/Ahmed%20HYDRUS%20Combo%20series%20ASCRS%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed IK. Compare the hydrus microstent(TM) to the iStent for lowering IOP in glaucoma patients having cataract surgery (hydrus III). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02024464
   Google Scholar
• Ivantis completes enrollment in pivotal HYDRUS IV glaucoma study of the hydrus™ microstent. [updated 2015 Apr 17]. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/ca-ivantis-inc-idUSnBw175128a±100±BSW20150417
   Google Scholar
• Alan Crandall M. Safety & effectiveness study of the Hydrus device for lowering IOP in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01539239?show_locs=Y#locn
   Google Scholar
• Comparing effectiveness of the Hydrus microstent (TM) to two iStents to lower IOP in phakic eyes (Hydrus V). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02023242
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Smedley GT. Trabecular bypass: effect of Schlemm canal and collector channel dilation. JGlaucoma. 2006;15(5):446–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar