Pros and cons of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy

References

• Shortt AJ, Allan BD, Evans JR. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan;31(1):CD005135.
   Google Scholar
• Manche EE, Haw WW. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American ophthalmological society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011 Dec;109:201–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murakami Y, Manche EE. Prospective, randomized comparison of self-reported postoperative dry eye and visual fluctuation in LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2220–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshirfar M, Churgin DS, Betts BS, et al. Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVueTM STAR S4 IRTM in photorefractive keratectomy: analysis of visual outcomes and higher-order aberrations. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1185–1193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sia RK, Ryan DS, Stutzman RD, et al. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;41(10):2152–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He L, Manche EE. Prospective randomized contralateral eye evaluation of subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided or wavefront- optimized photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;30(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan DS, Sia RK, Stutzman RD, et al. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: visual and military task performance. Mil Med. 2017 Jan;182(1):e1636–e1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, et al. Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy with the use of a new hartmann-shack aberrometer in patients with Myopia and compound Myopic astigmatism. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:514837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roe JR, Manche EE. Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of high-resolution wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 4:S0002-9394(19)30259–4 Epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, et al. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):37–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Wilson SE, Smadja D, et al. Validation of the percent tissue altered as a risk factor for ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):908–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Gomes BF, et al. Association between the percent tissue altered and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in eyes with normal preoperative topography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhiago MR, Smadja D, Wilson SE, et al. Role of percent tissue altered on ectasia after LASIK in eyes with suspicious topography. J Refract Surg. 2015 Apr;31(4):258–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin N, Kaiserman I, Domniz Y, et al. Risk assessment for corneal ectasia following photorefractive keratectomy. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:2434830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang ES, Stagg BC, Swan R, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;3(11):1785–1789.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2049–2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre- and post-LASIK and LASEK. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;86(2):215–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea. 2009 Aug;28(7):765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare G, Moore TC, Grills C, et al. Early flap displacement after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1760–1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos AM, Torricelli AA, Marino GK, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK flap complications. J Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;32(1):52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MD, Manche EE. Quality of vision after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy: contralateral eye evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister EM, Bishop FM, Kaupp SE, et al. Randomized dose-response analysis of mitomycin-C to prevent haze after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1358–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carones F, Vigo L, Scandola E, et al. Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):2088–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busool Y, Mimouni M, Vainer I, et al. Risk factors predicting steroid-induced ocular hypertension after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Mar;43(3):389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi MA, Mirbabaei-Ghafghazi F, Mirzade M, et al. Steroid induced ocular hypertension following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2008 Jan;3(1):42–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar