Ultrasonic ocular dimensions and anthropometry in normal and myopic eyes: a case-control study

References

• Lee D. Current methods of myopia control: a literature review and update. J Behav Optomet. 2009;20:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Koomson N, Lartey S, Adjah K. Prevalence of Myopia amongst patients with refractive error in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana. Maejo Int J Sci Technol. 2013;33(2):73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Adegbehingbe B, Majekodunmi A, Akinsola F, et al. Pattern of refractive errors at Obafemi Awolowo University teaching hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Nig J Ophthalmol. 2004;11(2):76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Azonobi I. Refractive error blindness in Yenagoa, Bayelsa state, Nigeria: a hospital based study. Ben J Postgrad Med. 2010;12(1):37–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ovenseri-Ogbomo G, Morny E. Causes of visual impairment in Central Region, Ghana. JNOA. 2008;14:11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rehm DS 1981. The Myopia Myth: the truth about Nearsightedness and How to prevent it: IMPA. [Internet]. cited 2015 Jun 10] cited 2015 Jun 10 at www.amazon.com/myopia-myth-truth-nearsightedness-prevent/dp/096084760x.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang B-C, Woessner WM. Vitreous chamber elongation is responsible for myopia development in a young adult. Optometry and Vision Science. 1996;73(4):231–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw S, Chua WH, Gazzard G, et al. Eye growth changes in myopic children in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1489–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrier S, Wu HM, Newland HS, et al. Ocular biometry and determinants of refractive error in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila eye study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(12):1591–1594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, et al. The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2001;42(6):1237–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie R, Zhou X-T, Lu F, et al. Correlation between myopia and major biometric parameters of the eye: a retrospective clinical study. Optometry and Vision Science. 2009;86(5):E503–E508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yekta AA, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, et al. Relationship between refractive errors and ocular biometry components in carpet weavers. Iran J of Ophthalmol. 2010;22(2):45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, et al. Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2002;43(5):1408–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HM, Gupta A, Newland HS, et al. Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila eye study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;35(9):834–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osuobeni EP, Okpala I, Williamson TH, et al. Height, weight, body mass index and ocular biometry in patients with sickle cell disease. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 2009;29(2):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter T. Anthropometric indicators in relation to the gold standard. In: George A, Claude B, editors. Handbook of Obesity. 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor and Francis; 2014. p. 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Stephanie R, Michelle M, Stephen E. Head and Neck. In: Timothy, editor. Anatomy for diagnostic imaging. Second ed. Philladephia: Saunders, Elsevier Limited; 2004. p. 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez JM. 2002. In highly myopic eyes, B-scan biometry locates macula. Ocular Surgery News Europe/ Asia - pacific Edition (Archive). [Internet]. cited 2016 Oct 01] cited 2016 Oct 01 http://www.healio.com/ophthalmology/news/print/ocular-surgery-news-europe-asia-edition.accessed10/01/16.
   Google Scholar
• Openepi calculator for sample size determination for comparative groups. [cited 2016 June 22]. Available from: www.openepi.com>samplesize>sscc.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kyari F, Gudlavalleti MV, Sivasubramanianm S, et al. Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: the national blindness and visual impairment study group. Invest ophthalmol Vis Sci May. 2009;50(5):2033–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang QH, Chen B, Peng GH, et al. Accuracy of axial length measurements from immersion B-scan ultrasonography in highly myopic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(3):441–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran. BMC Ophthalmology. 2012;12(1):50–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, et al. Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optometry and Vision Science. 2003;80(3):226–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wani JS, Parray SI, Keng MQ, et al. Profile of Axial length in Kashmiri population with cataract. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2014;3(9):1120–1122.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim B, Oh T-H, et al. Correlations between magnitude of refractive error and other optical components in Korean myopes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(5):324–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Á Á, et al. Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(6):734–738.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dirani M, Islam A, Baird PN. Body stature and myopia—the genes in myopia (GEM) twin study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008;15(3):135–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergès O, Puech M, Assouline M, et al. B-mode-guided vector-A-mode versus A-mode biometry to determine axial length and intraocular lens power. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 1998;24(4):529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu KG, Shalaby MH, El Shiwy H, et al. Immersion B–guided versus contact A-mode biometry for accurate measurement of axial length and intraocular lens power calculation in siliconized eyes. Retina. 2011;31(2):262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar