Principles of ophthalmic ultrasound

References

• Silverman RH, Vinarsky E, Woods SM, et al. The effect of transducer bandwidth on ultrasonic image characteristics. Retina. 1995;15(1):37–42. doi:10.1097/00006982-199515010-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksala A, Lehtinen A. Diagnostic value of ultrasonics in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134(6):387–395. doi:10.1159/000303246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baum G, Greenwood I. The application of ultrasonics locating techniques to ophthalmology; theoretic considerations and acoustic properties of ocular media. I. Reflective properties. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958;46(5 Pt 2):319–329. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(58)90813-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum G, Greenwood I. The application of ultrasonic locating techniques to ophthalmology. II. Ultrasonic slit lamp in the ultrasonic visualization of soft tissues. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;60(2):263–279. doi:10.1001/archopht.1958.00940080279015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansson F, Kock E. Determination of the velocity of ultrasound in the human lens and vitreous. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1962;40:420–433. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1962.tb02390.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begui ZE. Acoustic properties of the refractive media of the eye. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;26(3):365–368. doi:10.1121/1.1907343
   Google Scholar
• Oksala A, Lehtinen A. Measurement of the velocity of sound in some parts of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1958;36(4):633–639. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1958.tb02271.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linebarger EJ, Hardten DR, Shah GK, et al. Phacoemulsification and modern cataract surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;44(2):123–147. doi:10.1016/S0039-6257(99)00085-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple DJ. Sir Harold Ridley and his fight for sight: he changed the World so that we may better see it. Thorofare NJ: SLACK, Inc.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Carlin B. A new system for visual axis measurements in the human eye using ultrasound. Arch Ophtalmol. 1967;77(1):124–127. doi:10.1001/archopht.1967.00980020126027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hennessy MP, Chan DG. Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(11):2195–2198. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00224-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989;67(1):101–102. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00732.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay JT, Musgrove KH, Prager TC, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80059-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(6):700–712. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(3):333–340. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80705-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter J, Atwan N. A Comparison between ultrasound pachymetry and CASIA2 (anterior-segment optical coherence tomography) in the measurement of central corneal thickness. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e39921. doi:10.7759/cureus.39921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğan M, Ertan E. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(2):126–130. doi:10.1111/cxo.12865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Fink BA, King-Smith PE, et al. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments. Cornea. 2011;30(11):1238–1243. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Konig WF, Katz L. A hand-operated, ultrasound scan system for ophthalmic evaluation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(2):256–263. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(69)94068-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Dallow RL, Smith ME. Immersion ultrasonography: simultaneous A-scan and B-scan. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1979;19(4):67–102. doi:10.1097/00004397-197901940-00005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bronson NR. Development of a simple B-scan ultrasonoscope. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1972;70:365–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherar MD, Foster FS. The design and fabrication of high frequency poly(vinylidene fluoride) transducers. Ultrason Imaging. 1989;11(2):75–94. doi:10.1177/016173468901100201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherar MD, Starkoski BG, Taylor WB, et al. A 100 MHz B-scan ultrasound backscatter microscope. Ultrason Imaging. 1989;11(2):95–105. doi:10.1177/016173468901100202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, et al. Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol. 1991;98(3):287–295. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32298-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Reinstein DZ, Raevsky T, et al. Improved system for sonographic imaging and biometry of the cornea. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16(2):117–124. doi:10.7863/jum.1997.16.2.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, et al. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(4):414–430. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20000701-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Urs R, et al. Detection of keratoconus in clinically and algorithmically topographically normal fellow eyes using Epithelial thickness analysis. J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):736–744. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20151021-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, et al. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(4):259–271. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100218-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Urs R, Roychoudhury A, et al. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(3):1580–1587. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK flap thickness profile and reproducibility of the standard vs zero compression hansatome microkeratomes: three-dimensional display with Artemis VHF digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(6):417–426. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20101110-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of Artemis central flap thickness and visual outcomes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(2):107–119. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100121-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Sutton HF, Srivannaboon S, et al. Evaluating microkeratome efficacy by 3D corneal lamellar flap thickness accuracy and reproducibility using Artemis VHF digital ultrasound arc-scanning. J Refract Surg. 2006;22(5):431–440. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20060501-03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:132–156. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vira J, Marchese A, Singh RB, et al. Swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging of the retinochoroid and beyond. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020;17(5):413–426. doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1755256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(4):496–500. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrejen S, Spaide RF. Optical coherence tomography: imaging of the choroid and beyond. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(5):387–429. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursea R, Feng M, Urs R, et al. Comparison of Artemis 2 ultrasound and visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(1):36–41. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20121126-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevers M, Strabbing EM, Engin O, et al. CT parameters in pure orbital wall fractures and their relevance in the choice of treatment and patient outcome: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51(6):782–789. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2021.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, et al. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289–296. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon R, Badawy MK. Radiation dose and risk to the lens of the eye during CT examinations of the brain. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019;63(6):786–794. doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin AS, Hoang JK, Malinzak MD. CT and MRI of the orbit. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018;58(2):25–59. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger A. How does it work?: magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ. 2002;324(7328):35. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7328.35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindner T, Langner S, Graessl A, et al. High spatial resolution in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the human eye, orbit, nervus opticus and optic nerve sheath at 7.0 Tesla. Exp Eye Res. 2014;125:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glarin RK, Nguyen BN, Cleary JO, et al. MR-EYE: high-resolution MRI of the human eye and orbit at Ultrahigh field (7T). Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2021;29(1):103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2020.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinborn M, Fiegler J, Kraus V, et al. High resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve and the optic nerve sheath: anatomic correlation and clinical importance. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(6):608–613. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Ketterling JA, Coleman DJ. High-frequency ultrasonic imaging of the anterior segment using an annular array transducer. Ophthalmol. 2007;114(4):816–822. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Ketterling JA, Mamou J, et al. Pulse-encoded ultrasound imaging of the vitreous with an annular array. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43(1):82–86. doi:10.3928/15428877-20110901-03
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hedrick WR, Hykes DL. Beam steering and focusing with linear phiased arrays. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 1996;12(5):211–215. doi:10.1177/875647939601200502
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Abramowicz JS, Adhikari S, Dickman E, et al. Ocular ultrasound: review of bioeffects and safety, including fetal and point of care perspective: review of bioeffects and safety, including fetal and point-of-care perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(7):1609–1622. doi: 10.1002/jum.15864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanter M, Fink M. Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61(1):102–119. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urs R, Ketterling JA, Silverman RH. Ultrafast ultrasound imaging of ocular anatomy and blood flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(8):3810–3816. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urs R, Ketterling JA, Yu ACH, et al. Ultrasound imaging and measurement of choroidal blood flow. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018;7(5):5. doi:10.1167/tvst.7.5.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Urs R, Wapner RJ, et al. Plane-wave ultrasound Doppler of the eye in preeclampsia. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(10):14. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.10.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia M, Provost J, Tanter M, et al. 4D ultrafast ultrasound flow imaging: in vivo quantification of arterial volumetric flow rate in a single heartbeat. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(23):L48–l61. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/23/L48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar