Encouraging children to think counterfactually enhances blocking in a causal learning task

REFERENCES

• Amsel, E., Trionfi, G., & Campbell, R. (2005). Reasoning about make-believe and hypothetical suppositions: Towards a theory of belief-contravening reasoning. Cognitive Development, 20, 545–575. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrouillet, P., Grosset, N., & Lecas, J. (2000). Conditional reasoning by mental models: Chronometric and developmental evidence. Cognition, 75, 237–266. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00066-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238–249. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, T., Miller, R. R., De Houwer, J., & Urushihara, K. (2006). Reasoning rats: Forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92–102. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S., Debeys, I., & De Houwer, J. (2009). Three-year-olds' retrospective revaluation in the blicket detector task. Backward blocking or recovery from overshadowing? Experimental Psychology, 56, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Braine, M. D. S., & Rumain, B. (1983). Logical reasoning. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 263–340). New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 27, 724–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, L., & Wasserman, E. A. (2009). Rats and infants as propositional reasoners: A plausible possibility? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 203–204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan, R., & Denton, P. (1996). Causal understanding as a developmental primitive. Developmental Review, 16, 162–202. doi: 10.1006/drev.1996.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 345–357.
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., & Vandorpe, S. (2005). Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena. Learning & Behavior, 33, 239–249. doi: 10.3758/BF03196066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, M. G., & Harris, P. L. (1988). The effect of make-believe play on deductive reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 207–221. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01095.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, M. G., & Harris, P. L. (1990). The influence of the imagination on reasoning by young-children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 305–318. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1990.tb00847.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, A. (2001). Causal learning: An associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, A., Shanks, D. R., & Evenden, J. L. (1984). Judgment of act–outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L., German, T., & Mills, P. (1996). Children's use of counterfactual thinking in causal reasoning. Cognition, 61, 233–259. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00715-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, T. (1985). Causation in the law. OxfordUK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haselgrove, M. (2010). Reasoning rats or associative animals? A common-element analysis of the effects of additive and subadditive pretraining on blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 296–306. doi: 10.1037/a0016603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerl, C., McCormack, T., & Beck, S. (2011). Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation. OxfordUK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. HoveUK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Eds.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation (pp. 9–32). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69–81. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00534-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Wong, E. (2006). Thinking within the box. The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Leevers, H., & Harris, P. L. (2000). Counterfactual syllogistic reasoning in normal 4-year-olds, children with learning disabilities, and children with autism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 64–87. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovibond, P. F., Been, S., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., & Frohardt, R. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133–142. doi: 10.3758/BF03196088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. OxfordUK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. (2003). Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 419–434. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manktelow, K. (2012). Thinking and reasoning: An introduction to the psychology of reason, judgment, and decision making. HoveUK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., Lindberg, M. J., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 312–324. doi: 10.1177/0146167206296106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, T., Butterfill, S., Hoerl, C., & Burns, P. (2009). Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1563–1575. doi: 10.1037/a0017408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, T., Frosch, C., & Burns, P. (2011). The relationship between children's causal and counterfactual judgments. In C. Hoerl, T. McCormack & S. R. Beck (Eds.), Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 54–74). OxfordUK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, T., Simms, V., McGourty, J., & Beckers, T. (in press). Blocking in children's causal learning depends on working memory and reasoning abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, ,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., Killedar, A., & Lovibond, P. F. (2005). Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 418–424. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F., & Condoleon, M. (2005). Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments. Learning and Motivation, 36, 77–87. doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestler, S., & von Collani, G. (2008). Hindsight bias and the activation of counterfactual mind-sets. Experimental Psychology, 55, 342–349. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 97–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton.
   Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, A. (2001). Perception versus knowledge of cause and effect in children: When seeing is believing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 111–115. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmajuk, N., & Larrauri, J. (2008). Associative models can describe both causal learning and conditioning. Behavioural Processes, 77, 443–445.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (2007). Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 291–309. doi: 10.1080/17470210601000581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning: From association to cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 273–301. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, V., McCormack, T., & Beckers, T. (2012). Additivity pretraining and cue competition effects: Developmental evidence for a reasoning-based account of causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 180–190. doi: 10.1037/a0027202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., Kincannon, A., & Stose, S. (2005). The relation between counterfactual and causal reasoning. In D. Mandel, D. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking. LondonUK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Reasoning about things that didn't happen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1154–1170. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urcelay, G. P., & Miller, R. R. (2010). Potentiation and overshadowing in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 340–356. doi: 10.1037/a0014350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, S., & De Houwer, J. (2005). A comparison of forward blocking and reduced overshadowing in human causal learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 945–949. doi: 10.3758/BF03196790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, S., De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2005). Further evidence for the role of inferential reasoning in forward blocking. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1047–1056. doi: 10.3758/BF03193212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149. doi: 10.1006/drev.1999.0497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar