Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries

REFERENCES

• Alegre, M., Gordon, P. (1999). Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 68, 347–354. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-41 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 937–942. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0120-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole-words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(9), 1798–1819. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani, C., Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217–227. doi: 10.1080/01690968708406932
   Google Scholar
• Burani, C., Laudanna, A. (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In FrostR.KatzL. (Ed.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning, (pp. 361–376). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud [Review]. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. (2010). Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 312–321. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010a). SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology: Special Issue on Modeling Word Recognition and Reading Aloud, 22, 695–724. doi: 10.1080/09541440903155682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010b). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Morris, J., Serota, R. M., Bertrand, B., & Grainger, J. (in press). Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes.
   Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895–908. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition [Article]. Cognition, 105(3), 691–703. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference?. In PughK.McCradleP. (Ed.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice, (pp. 235–254). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organisation in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In BoninP. (Ed.), The mental lexicon, (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13, Article no. 54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   Google Scholar
• Harm, M. V., Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?. Linguistics, 39(6), 1041–1070. doi: 10.1515/ling.2001.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudanna, A., Burani, C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In FeldmanL. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing: Cross-linguistic perspectives, (pp. 345–364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Brysbaert, M., Rastle, K. (2009). Is morphological decomposition limited to low-frequency words?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1706–1715. doi: 10.1080/17470210902849991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a “fete” in “fetish”? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813–836. doi: 10.1080/09541440802366919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? [Article]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 418–422. doi: 10.3758/BF03193863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In KinoshitaS.LupkerS. J. (Ed.), Masked priming—The state of the art, (pp. 97–120). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Lupker, S. J. (2007). The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition. [Article]. Psicothema, 19(4), 559–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.7.1), Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueckl, J. G., Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language & Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 482–508. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In FeldmanL. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar