The relationship between language production and verbal short-term memory: The role of stress grouping

REFERENCES

• Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2011). A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1358–1367. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009a). Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 329–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009b). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50–68. doi: 10.1037/a0014411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, H. F. (1915). A note on the effect of rhythm on memory. Psychological Review, 22(4), 289–298. doi: 10.1037/h0075190
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory, London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, 575–589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa P. A., Arantes, P., Meireles A. R., & Vieira, J. M. (2005). Abstractness in speech-metronome synchronisation: P-centres as cyclic attractors, Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005), (pp. 14411444). Lisbon, Portugal: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, R. A. H., Benavides-Varela, S., & Nespor, M. (2011). Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech, 54, 123–140. doi: 10.1177/0023830910388018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05), Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, V. J. (2006). On the function of stress rhythms in speech: Evidence of a link with grouping effects on serial memory. Language & Speech, 49(4), 495–519. doi: 10.1177/00238309060490040301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127–181. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106(3), 551–581. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2005). Computational models of working memory: Putting long term memory into context. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 535–541. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 627–652. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 47–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., & Yallop, C. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliot, E. M., & Moreno, M. V. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 153–177. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1994). Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua, 92, 81–104. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(94)90338-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 218–236. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142. doi: 10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (1980). Errors in speech and short-term memory: The effects of phonemic similarity and syllable position. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 624–634. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90672-6
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. A. (1979). “Perceptual centres” in speech production and perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(5), 375–388. doi: 10.3758/BF03199846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankish, C. (1985). Modality-specific grouping effects in short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(2), 200–209. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90024-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankish, C. (1989). Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 469–470. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankish, C. (1995). Intonation and auditory grouping in immediate serial recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(7), S5–S22. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350090703
   Google Scholar
• Frankish, C., & Turner, J. (1984). Delayed suffix effect at very short delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(4), 767–777. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, R. W. (1989). Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall. Memory and Cognition, 17(5), 551–562. doi: 10.3758/BF03197078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. (Ed.). (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Nonword repetition: More than just a phonological output task. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(8), 857–861. doi: 10.1080/02643299508251405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1), 84–95. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000002
   Google Scholar
• Gerken, L. A. (1994). Young children's representation of prosodic phonology: Evidence from English-speakers' weak syllable productions. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 19–38. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, J. S. F., & Diehl, R. L. (2007). Perception of rhythmic grouping: Testing the iambic/trochaic law. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(1), 113–122. doi: 10.3758/BF03194458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 227–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1995). The rhythmic basis of the foot inventory. In B. Hayes (Ed.), Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies (pp. 79–85). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Nickels, L. (2005). Separating input and output phonology: Semantic, phonological, and orthographic effects in short-term memory impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(1), 42–77. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Newton, P., Cowan, N., Stuart, G., & Brown, G. (1999). Think before you speak: Pauses, memory search and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 447–463. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1217–1232. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.23.5.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkelas, S., & Zec, D. (1990). The phonology–syntax connection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 480–486. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, A., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2011). Phonological trochaic grouping in language planning and language change. In S. Frota (Ed.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing word in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in language production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass, D., Lahiri, A., & Wheeldon, L. (2010, January). Generating phonological words: Evidence from English phrase production, Paper presented at Phonology Forum Conference on the Word, CUNY, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, S. M. (1981). Acoustic determinants of perceptual center (P-center) location. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 247–256. doi: 10.3758/BF03214280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Freedman, M. L. (2001). Short-term retention of lexical–semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory, 9(4/5/6), 261–280. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000173
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3–29. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analysis: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42, 181–211. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. L., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2003). Syllable monitoring in internally and externally generated English words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), 269–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1023591518131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill, T. (2011). Acoustic correlates of stress in English adjective–noun compounds. Language and Speech, 55(2), 167–201. doi: 10.1177/0023830911417251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J., Marcus, S. M., & Frankish, C. R. (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83, 405–408. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.83.5.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. DordrechtThe Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. P. A., Madge, A., Cumming, N., & Norris, D. G. (2007). Speech errors and the phonological similarity effect in short-term memory: Evidence suggesting a common locus. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 49–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quené, H., & Port, R. F. (2005). Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica, 62(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1159/000087222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, C., Schmauder, A. R., & Morris, R. K. (2000). Stress grouping improves performance on an immediate serial list recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1638–1654. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revithiadou, A. (2004). The iambic/trochaic law revisited: Lengthening and shortening in trochaic systems. In B. Arsenijevic, N. Elouazizi, M. Salzmann, & M. de Vos (Ed.), Leiden Papers in Linguistics 1.1 (pp. 37–62). Leiden: Leiden Universiteit/ULCL.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). Syllabification in speech production: Evaluation of WEAVER. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 657–693. doi: 10.1080/016909697386655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2002). Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 465–483. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000488
   Google Scholar
• Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 292–323. doi: 10.1080/17470210601147747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodenrys, S., & Hinton, M. (2002). Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 29–33. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Alban, J., Ellis, A. W., & Brown, G. D. A. (1994). Effects of word frequency and age of acquisition on short-term memory span. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 695–701. doi: 10.3758/BF03209254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. (1969a). Grouping and short-term memory: Different means and patterns of grouping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 137–147. doi: 10.1080/14640746908400206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. (1969b). Temporal grouping, rehearsal and short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 148–155. doi: 10.1080/14640746908400207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 168–175. doi: 10.3758/BF03202729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(3), 563–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. L. Beckman, D. Walsh, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), Papers in optimality theory, UMASS occasional papers in phonology. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Shilling, H., Wheeldon, L. R., & Krott, A. (2013). Compound and phrasal stress acquisition: When does greenhouse become different to green house?, Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R (Eds.). (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706–716. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn, A. S. C., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(4), 729–735. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Reintegration and the benefits of long-term knowledge in verbal short-term memory: An evaluation of Schweickert's (1993) multinomial processing tree model. Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 133–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2011a). Effects of syllable stress on articulatory planning observed in a stop-signal experiment. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 642–659. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2011b). Metrical regularity facilitates speech planning and production. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 185–218. doi: 10.1515/labphon.2011.006
   Google Scholar
• Toro, J. M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mattys, S. (2009). The role of perceptual salience during the segmentation of connected speech. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 786–800. doi: 10.1080/09541440802405584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 367–376. doi: 10.1121/1.3129127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101–175. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1256–1271. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R. (2000). Generating prosodic structure. In L. R. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of sentence production (pp. 249–274). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–381. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (2003). Is the phonological word a unit of language production? In M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, & J. Romero (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2003), (pp. 426–431). Barcelona: UAB.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Morgan, J. L. (2002). Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 503–535. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickelgren, W. (1967). Rehearsal grouping and hierarchical organization of serial position cues in short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(2), 97–102. doi: 10.1080/14640746708400077
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, H. (1909). A quantitative study of rhythm: The effect of variations in intensity, rate and duration. Archives in Psychology, 14, 1–66.
   Google Scholar