The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect

References

• Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 544–549. doi: 10.3758/BF03214369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.8
   Google Scholar
• Beaman, P. C., & Jones, D. M. (1997). Role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing-state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–32. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90003-7
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework, New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsi, J. (2013). Sinewave stimuli [Web page]. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/joshdorsi/research/ISE/stimuli
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. W., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: The role of changing-state vowels. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 886–890. doi: 10.3758/BF03196781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hygge, S., Boman, E., & Enmarker, I. (2003). The effects of road traffic noise and meaningful irrelevant speech on different memory systems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 13–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Macken, W. J., Banbury, S. P., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: Linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(3), 1082–1088. doi: 10.1121/1.1288412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Murray, A. C. (1993). Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation. Memory and Cognition, 21(3), 318–328. doi: 10.3758/BF03208264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 44, 645–669. doi: 10.1080/14640749208401304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCompte, D. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5), 1154–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCompte, D. C., Neely, C. B., & Wilson, J. R. (1997). Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: The relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(2), 472–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken, W. J., Mosdell, N., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing state?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 810–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403–423. doi: 10.3758/BF03214356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (2003). The irrelevant-sound effect: What needs modeling, and a tentative model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 1289–1300. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212(4497), 947–950. doi: 10.1126/science.7233191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 107–122. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlittmeier, S. J., Weiβgerber, T., Kerber, S., Fastl, H., & Hellbrück, J. (2012). Algorithmic modeling of the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) by the hearing sensation fluctuation strength. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 194–203. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0230-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., & Bireta, T. J. (2007). Changing state and the irrelevant sound effect. Canadian Acoustics, 35, 86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Nicholls, A. P., Alford, D., & Jones, D. M. (2000). The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1750–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, N. (2009). The role of the listener's state in speech perception, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, N., Magnuson, J. S., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?, Manuscript submitted for publication
   Google Scholar