Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference

REFERENCES

• Bisiacchi, P. S., Schiff, S., Ciccola, A., & Kliegel, M. (2009). The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1362–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boywitt, C. D., & Rummel, J. (2012). A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 70–82. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0128-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36, 149–156. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. L., Jaudas, A., Hirschhorn, E., Sobin, E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012). The specificity of prospective memory costs. Memory, 20, 848–864. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.710637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. doi: 10.1038/nrn755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitt, M. R., Hicks, J. L., Ball, B. H., & Knight, J. B. (2012). Encountering items previously paired with prospective memory target events can serve to reactivate intentions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 981–990. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2012.727389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. (1995). Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 721–733). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. In A. S. Benjamin & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–173). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.48
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082–1088. doi:10.1037/a0019184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., Cohen, A.-L., Oettingen, G., & Burgess, P. W. (2009). Separable brain systems supporting cued versus self-initiated realization of delayed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 905–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245–256. doi: 10.1080/00207590344000178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430–444. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. B., Ethridge, L. E., Marsh, R. L., & Clementz, B. A. (2010). Neural correlates of attentional and mnemonic processing in event-based prospective memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(5). doi:10.3389/neuro.09.005.2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. B., Meeks, J. T., Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., Brewer, G. A., & Hicks, J. L. (2011). An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 298–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, S., Kearney, R., & Remington, R. (2008). Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?. Memory & Cognition, 36, 139–148. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, S., & Yeo, G. (2007). An investigation into the resource requirements of event-based prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 263–274. doi: 10.3758/BF03193447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, J. S., White, K., & Maylor, E. A. (2013, July 8). Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0033702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1636–1643. doi: 10.3758/BF03195926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604–610. doi: 10.3758/BF03196319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 336–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144. doi: 10.1002/acp.775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 605–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNerney, M. W., & West, R. (2007). An imperfect relationship between prospective memory and the prospective interference effect. Memory & Cognition, 35, 275–282. doi: 10.3758/BF03193448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks, J. T., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2007). Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory. Consciousness & Cognition, 16, 997–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulckhuyse, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Unconscious cueing effects in saccadic eye movements—Facilitation and inhibition in temporal and nasal hemifield. Vision Research, 50, 606–613. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimers, S., & Maylor, E. A. (2005). Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 661–671. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullin, M. K., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition, 37, 425–433. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2010). Control of cost in prospective memory: Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 190–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., Shelton, J. T., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: Monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 736–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727–741. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.2.727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089–1095. doi:10.1037/a0019183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. S., Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2004). The influence of partial-match cues on event-based prospective memory. Memory, 12, 203–213. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vortac, O. U., Edwards, M. B., Fuller, D. K., & Manning, C. A. (1993). Automation and cognition in air traffic control: An empirical investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 631–651. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350070707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., & Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264–272. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.14.2.264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., Herndon, R. W., & Crewdson, S. J. (2001). Neural activity associated with the realization of a delayed intention. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00014-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar