Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity

REFERENCES

• Abrams, R. A., & Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 467–477. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.3.467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, E. L., Tai, J. C., & Carrasco, M. (2002). Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 42, 949–967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00039-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Fuller, S., & Ling, S. (2008). Transient attention does increase perceived contrast of suprathreshold stimuli: A reply to Prinzmetal, Long and Leonhardt (2008). Perception & Psychophysics, 70(7), 1151–1164. doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308–313. doi:10.1038/nn1194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., Penpeci-Talgar, C., & Eckstein, M. P. (2000). Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: Support for signal enhancement. Vision Research, 40, 1203–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, M., & Yeshurun, Y. (2009). Covert attention effects on spatial resolution. In N. Srinivasan (Ed.), Progress in brain research, vol. 176, Attention (pp. 65–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cheal, M., & Chastain, G. (1999). Inhibition of return: Support for generality of the phenomenon. Journal of General Psychology, 126(4), 375–390. doi:10.1080/00221309909595372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., & Mangun, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing. Psychological Science, 10, 157–161. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307–314. doi:10.3758/BF03196166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2004). Stimulus–response probability and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 542–550. doi:10.3758/BF03196608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2006). Inhibition of return: Sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 908–919. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff, J., Klein, R. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 318–327. doi:10.3758/BF03195794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzel, D., Zarian, L., & Souto, D. (2009). Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 1–16. doi:10.1167/9.11.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431. doi:10.1038/334430a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M., & Dick, B. (2002). Temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts: A dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation exploration. Psychological Science, 13, 176–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00432
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, J. W. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346–352. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Transient covert attention does alter appearance: A reply to Schneider (2006). Perception & Psychophysics, 69(6), 1051–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Abrams, J., & Carrasco, M. (2009). Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance. Psychological Science, 20(3), 354–362. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02300.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T., Pestilli, F., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and fMRI response in human visual cortex. Neuron, 45, 469–477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.039
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Z. L., & Dosher, B. A. (1998). External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms. Vision Research, 38, 1183–1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00273-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z. L., & Dosher, B. A. (2000). Spatial attention: Different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1534–1548. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.5.1534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Arevalo, E., Kingstone, A., & Lupianez, J. (2013). Is “Inhibition of Return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 347–359. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.711844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Trujillo, J. C., & Treue, S. (2002). Attention changes apparent stimulus contrast in primate visual cortex. Neuron, 35, 365–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAdams, C. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1999). Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1411–1423. doi:10.3758/BF03206190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirpour, K., Arcizet, F., Ong, W. S., & Bisley, J. W. (2009). Been there, seen that: A neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 3481–3491. doi:10.1152/jn.00688.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228. doi:10.1080/02643298508252866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 73–92. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Park, S., & Garrett, R. (2005). Involuntary attention and identification accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1344–1353. doi:10.3758/BF03193639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703–714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81206-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. C. (1996). Inhibition of return without visual input. Neuropsychologia, 34, 943–952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00015-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A, P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J., Levy-Berger, G., & Haydon, M. (1985). Human experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L. (2007). Inhibition of return for expected and unexpected targets. ACTA Psychologica (Amsterdam), 124, 257–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Ivanoff, J. (2003). The interplay of stoop signal inhibition and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 56, 1349–1371. doi:10.1080/02724980343000099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in IOR. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1639–1656. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.5.1639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J., & Chen, C. Y. (2005). Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): The effect on perceptual sensitivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1305–1312. doi:10.3758/BF03193636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treue, S., & Martinez-Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399, 575–579. doi:10.1038/21176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, cometing accumulator model. Psychological review, 108, 550–592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Klein, R. M. (2010). Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review. Vision Research, 50, 220–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1998). Attention improves or impairs visual perception by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75. doi:10.1038/23936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Heinke, D., Ivanoff, J., Klein, R. M., & Humphreys, G. W. (2011). Tow components in IOR: Evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 2143–2159. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0181-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar