Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers

REFERENCES

• Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Self-induced attentional blink: A cause of errors in multiple-target search. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797613497970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M. R., Peterson, M. S., & Vomela, M. (2006). Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 235–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbaum, K. S. (2012, February). Satisfaction of search experiments in advanced imaging. In IS&T/SPIE electronic imaging (pp. 82910 V-182910 V-10). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Berbaum, K. S., Dorfman, D. D., Franken, E. A. Jr, & Caldwell, R. T. (2000). Proper ROC analysis and joint ROC analysis of the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Academic Radiology, 7, 945–958. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80176-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbaum, K. S., Franken, E. A. Jr, Dorfman, D. D., Rooholamini, S. A., Coffman, C. E., Cornell, S. H., … & Smith, T. P. (1991). Time course of satisfaction of search. Investigative Radiology, 26, 640–648. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199107000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbaum, K. S., Franklin, E. A. Jr, Caldwell, R. T., & Schartz, K. M. (2010). Satisfaction of search in traditional radiographic imaging. In E. Samei & E. Krupinski (Eds.), The handbook of medical image perception and techniques (pp. 107–138). Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, A. T., Cain, M. S., Clark, K., Darling, E. F., Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Assessing visual search performance differences between transportation security administration officers and nonprofessional searchers. Visual Cognition, 21, 330–352. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.790329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Biggs, A. T., Darling, E. F., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-targets visual searches decreases second-target miss errors. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., Dunsmoor, J. E., LaBar, K. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011). Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual target search. Psychological Science, 22, 866–871. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1398–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39–78. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K., Cain, M. S., Adcock, R. A., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Context matters: The structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search. Applied Ergonomics. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K., Samei, E., Baker, J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2011, November). Expertise in radiological screening and satisfaction of search. Poster presented at the annual Object Perception, Attention, and Memory meeting. Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression (Vol. 5). New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, M. C., Madden, D. J., Shepler, A. M., Mitroff, S. R., & Leber, A. B. (2010). Age-related preservation of top-down control over distraction in visual search. Experimental Aging Research, 36, 249–272. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2010.484719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, C. A., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2007). Memory for the search path: Evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Vision Research, 47, 1745–1755. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–36. doi: 10.1167/11.5.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2007). Rare targets are rarely missed in correctable search. Psychological Science, 18, 943–947. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02006.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, M. S., Samei, E., & Mitroff, S. R. (2010). Generalized “satisfaction of search”: Adverse influences on dual target search accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 60–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 357, 575–577. doi: 10.1038/29068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. H., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Enhanced facial symmetry assessment in orthodontists. Visual Cognition. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2013.832450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. H., Mitroff, S. R., Clark, K., Proffit, W. R., Lee, J. Y., & Nguyen, T. T. (2013). Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 114(5), 663–671. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiner, M., Brainard, D. H., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). What's new in psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupinski, E. A. (2010). Current perspectives in medical image perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1205–1217. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, G. J. (2002). Diagnostic errors. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 740–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02155.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., Wickens, C. D., Vidoni, E. D., & Boot, W. R. (2004). Visual skills in airport security screening. Psychological Science, 15, 302–306. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00673.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menneer, T., Barrett, D. J. K., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., & Cave, K. R. (2007). Costs in searching for two targets: Dividing search across target types could improve airport security screening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 915–932. doi: 10.1002/acp.1305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K., & Martini, P. (2011). Situating visual search. Vision Research, 51, 1526–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1979). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 305–311. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb01687.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2007). Application of the diffusion model to two-choice tasks for adults 75-90 years old. Psychology and Aging, 22, 56–66. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A. (2003). Evaluation and selection of airport security screeners. AIRPORT, 2003(2), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A. (2005). Increasing efficiency in airport security screening. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 82, 405–416.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaninger, A., Hardmeier, D., & Hofer, F. (2004). Measuring visual abilities and visual knowledge of aviation security screeners. IEEE ICCST Proceedings, 258–264.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J. (1967). Error and variation in diagnostic radiology. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Tuddenham, W. J. (1962). Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis: Studies of psychophysiology of roentgen image perception. Radiology, 78, 694–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voytovich, A., Rippey, R., & Suffredini, A. (1985). Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning. Journal of Medical Education, 60, 302–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar