References
- Bertamini, M., & Munafo, M. R. (2012). Bite-size science and its undesired side effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 67–71. doi:10.1177/1745691611429353 doi: 10.1177/1745691611429353
- Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2013a). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. doi:10.1038/Nrn3475 doi: 10.1038/nrn3475
- Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2013b). Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 585–586. doi:10.1038/Nrn3475-C4 doi: 10.1038/nrn3475-c4
- Cohen, J. (1962). The Statistical power of abnormal-social psychological-research - a review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. doi:10.1037/H0045186 doi: 10.1037/h0045186
- Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2013). US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.
- Fisher, R. (1955). Statistical methods and scientific induction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology, 17(1), 69–78.
- Masicampo, E. J., & Lalande, D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11), 2271–2279. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.711335 doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.711335
- Munafo, M. R., Attwood, A. S., & Flint, J. (2008). Bias in genetic association studies: Effects of research location and resources. Psychological Medicine, 38(8), 1213–1214. doi:10.1017/S003329170800353x doi: 10.1017/S003329170800353X
- Pan, Z. L., Trikalinos, T. A., Kavvoura, F. K., Lau, J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Local literature bias in genetic epidemiology: An empirical evaluation of the Chinese literature. PLOS Medicine, 2(12), 1309–1317. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020334
- Quinlan, P. T. (2013). Misuse of power: In defence of small-scale science. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 585. doi:10.1038/Nrn3475-C1 doi: 10.1038/nrn3475-c1
- Rucci, A. J., & Tweney, R. D. (1980). Analysis of variance and the 2nd discipline of scientific psychology - historical account. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 166–184. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.166 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.166
- Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 309–316. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.2.309 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.309
- Sekercioglu, C. H. (2013). Citation opportunity cost of the high impact factor obsession. Current Biology, 23(17), R701–R702. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.065
- Shao, J. F., & Shen, H. Y. (2011). The outflow of academic papers from China: Why is it happening and can it be stemmed? Learned Publishing, 24(2), 95–97. doi:10.1087/20110203 doi: 10.1087/20110203
- Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632
- Simonsohn, U. (2013). The folly of powering replications based on observed effect size. Retrieved from http://datacolada.org/2013/10/14/powering_replications/
- Sterne, J. A., & Davey Smith, G. (2001). Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? British Medical Journal, 322(7280), 226–231. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.226
- Sullivan, P. F. (2007). Spurious genetic associations. Biological Psychiatry, 61(10), 1121–1126. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.010 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.11.010