188
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular articles

The fickle nature of similarity change as a result of categorization

&
Pages 2425-2438 | Received 01 Apr 2013, Accepted 27 Mar 2014, Published online: 14 Jul 2014

REFERENCES

  • Abdi, H. (2010). Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.442
  • Ashby, F. G., Queller, S., & Berretty, P. M. (1999). On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1178–1199. doi: 10.3758/BF03207622
  • Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2002). Single versus multiple systems of category learning: Reply to Nosofsky and Kruschke (2002). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 175–180. doi: 10.3758/BF03196275
  • Blair, M., & Homa, D. (2001). Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1153–1164. doi: 10.3758/BF03206385
  • Blair, M., & Homa, D. (2003). As easy to memorize as they are to classify: The 5-4 categories and the category advantage. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1293–1301. doi: 10.3758/BF03195812
  • Chin-Parker, S., & Ross, B. H. (2004). Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: A comparison of inference learning and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 216–226.
  • Delamater, A. R. (1998). Associative mediational processes in the acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 467–482.
  • Delamater, A. R. (2012). On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning. Learning & Behavior, 40, 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0036-4
  • Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630–633. doi: 10.1038/35036586
  • Folstein, J. R., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Not all spaces stretch alike: How the structure of morphspaces constrains the effect of category learning on shape perception. Vision Sciences Society, 10th annual meeting.
  • Folstein, J. R., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2012). Not all morphspaces stretch alike: How category learning affects object discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 807–820.
  • Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., & Miller, E. K. (2003). A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5235–5246.
  • Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178–200. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.178
  • Goldstone, R. L. (1995). Effects of categorization on color perception. Psychological Science, 6, 298–304. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00514.x
  • Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations thought category learning. Cognition, 78, 27–43. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00099-8
  • Goldstone, R. L., & Steyvers, M. (2001). The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1, 116–139. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.116
  • Gureckis, T. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). The effect of the internal structure of categories on perception. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 843). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Harnad, S. (Ed.) (1987). Categorical perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jiang, X., Bradley, E., Rini, R. A., Zeffiro, T., Vanmeter, J., & Riesenhuber, M. (2007). Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron, 53, 891–903. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.015
  • Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(3), 732–753.
  • Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). Sustain: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309–332. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309
  • Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Cognition, 3, 54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054
  • Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592–613. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.592
  • Mathy, F., Haladjian, H. H., Laurent, E., & Goldstone, R. L. (under review). Similarity-dissimilarity competition in disjunctive classification tasks.
  • McKinley, S. C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 128–148.
  • McMurray, B., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey, M. J., & Subik, D. (2008). Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1609–1631.
  • Minda, J. P., & Smith, J. D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27, 775–799.
  • Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1988). Perceptrons (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nakagawa, S. (2004). A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1044–1045. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh107
  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104–114.
  • Ozgen, E., & Davies, I. R. L. (2002). Acquisition of categorical color perception: A perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 477–493. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.4.477
  • Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2009). Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the Generalized Context Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1062–1080.
  • Pothos, E. M., & Chater, N. (2002). A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science, 26, 303–343. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2603_6
  • Pothos, E. M., Chater, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Information about the logical structure of a category affects generalization. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 371–386. doi: 10.1348/0007126041528158
  • Pothos, E. M., Edwards, D. J., & Perlman, A. (2011). Supervised vs. unsupervised categorization: Two sides of the same coin? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1692–1713. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.554990
  • Pothos, E. M., Perlman, A., Bailey, T. M., Kurtz, K., Edwards, D. J., Hines, P., & McDonnell, J. V. (2011). Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks. Cognition, 121, 83–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.002
  • Pothos, E. M., & Wills, A. J. (2011). Formal approaches in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Roberson, D., Damjanovic, L., & Pilling, M. (2007). Categorical perception of facial expressions: Evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1814–1829. doi: 10.3758/BF03193512
  • Roberson, D., & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 977–986. doi: 10.3758/BF03209345
  • Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 378–411. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.10.001
  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Ruts, W., Storms, G., & Hampton, J. (2004). Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 32, 83–95. doi: 10.3758/BF03195822
  • Schyns, P., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. (1997). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1–54.
  • Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243–265. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00069-9
  • Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75, whole no 517.
  • Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity-based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 166–188. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.166
  • Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J. Jr., & Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 659–680.
  • Stevenage, S. V. (1998). Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 39–57. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02672.x
  • Yamauchi, T., Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2002). Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 585–593.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.