Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance

References

• Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S., Ge, R., Kannan, R., & Moitra, A. (2012, May). Computing a nonnegative matrix factorization--provably. Proceedings of the 44th symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 145–162). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, A. A., Mehl, M. R., & Larsen, R. J. (2011). A positivity bias in written and spoken English and its moderation by personality and gender. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 508–515. doi: 10.1177/1948550611399154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni, M., Murphy, B., Barbu, E., & Poesio, M. (2010). Strudel: A corpus-based semantic model based on properties and types. Cognitive Science, 34, 222–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01068.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y. (2002). Détermination de la valence affective de termes dans de grands corpus de texte. In Y. Toussaint et C. Nedellec (Eds.), Actes du Colloque International sur la Fouille de Texte (CIFT) '02 (pp. 81–94). Nancy, France: Inria.
   Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Vincze, N. (2012). Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 998–1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. No. C-1). Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2010). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Affective ratings of words and instruction manual (Technical Report C-2). Gainesville: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, T., & Franz, A. (2006). Web 1 T 5-gram Version 1. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 991–997. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinaria, J., & Levy, J. (2007). Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 510–526. doi: 10.3758/BF03193020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. (2010). Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1, 18–37. doi: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, F. M., Weekes, B. S., & Ferstl, E. C. (2012). How are affective word ratings related to lexicosemantic properties? Evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cule, E., & De Iorio, M. (2012). A semi-automatic method to guide the choice of ridge parameter in ridge regression. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 1205.0686.
   Google Scholar
• Dinu, G., Pham, N., & Baroni, M. (2013). DISSECT: DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit. Proceedings of the System Demonstrations of ACL 2013 (51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics) (pp. 31–36). East Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
   Google Scholar
• Eilola, T. M., & Havelka, J. (2010). Affective norms for 210 British English and Finnish nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 134–140. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gootjes, L., Coppens, L. C., Zwaan, R. A., Franken, I. H., & Van Strien, J. W. (2011). Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: An ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79, 356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottron, T., Radcke, O., & Pickhardt, R. (2013). On the temporal dynamics of influence on the social semantic web. Semantic Web and Web Science (pp. 75–87). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological review, 114, 211–244. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann, S., & Mao, H. (2002). Positive and negative emotional verbal stimuli elicit activity in the left amygdala. Neuroreport, 13, 15–19. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200201210-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, S., Foxe, D., Leslie, F., Savage, S., Piguet, O., & Hodges, J. R. (2012). Grief and joy: Emotion word comprehension in the dementias. Neuropsychology, 26, 624–630. doi: 10.1037/a0029326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, A., & Inkpen, D. (2006). Second order co-occurrence PMI for determining the semantic similarity of words. In Calzolari, N., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2006), (pp. 1033–1038). Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jasmin, D., & Casasanto, D. (2012). The QWERTY Effect: How typing shapes the meanings of words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 499–504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0229-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., Leon, J. A., Olmos, R., & Escudero, I. (2010). Latent semantic analysis parameters for essay evaluation using small-scale corpora. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17, 1–29. doi: 10.1080/09296170903395890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34. doi: 10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, T. (2006). Emotional words: What's so different from just words?. Cortex, 42(6), 823–830. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70424-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00275-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8, 445–452. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Language encodes geographical information. Cognitive Science, 33(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(3), 155–158. doi: 10.3758/BF03212485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. R., & Barch, D. M. (2006). Episodic memory for emotional and non-emotional words in individuals with anhedonia. Psychiatry Research, 143, 121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A. L., … & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 169–177. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. M. (2010). Neurolinguistic findings on the language lexicon: The special role of proper names. The Chinese Journal of Physiology, 53, 351–358. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2010.AMM032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2, 1–135. doi: 10.1561/1500000011
   Google Scholar
• Proverbio, A. M., Lilli, S., Semenza, C., & Zani, A. (2001). ERP indexes of functional differences in brain activation during proper and common names retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 39, 815–827. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proverbio, A. M., Mariani, S., Zani, A., & Adorni, R. (2009). How are ‘Barack Obama’ and ‘President Elect’ differentially stored in the brain? An ERP investigation on the processing of proper and common noun pairs. PLoS ONE, 4(9), e7126. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesada, J. (2007). Creating your own LSA spaces. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Latent Semantic Analysis: A road to meaning (pp. 71–85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Recchia, G., & Jones, M. N. (2009). More data trumps smarter algorithms: Comparing pointwise mutual information with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 647–656. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recchia, G., & Louwerse, M. M. (2014). Grounding the ungrounded: Estimating locations of unknown place names from linguistic associations and grounded representations. Retrieved from https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2014/papers/224/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Comesaña, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (affective norms for English words). Behavior Research Methods, 39, 600–605. doi: 10.3758/BF03193031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, M. B., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K., & Kintsch, W. (1998). Using Latent Semantic Analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 337–354. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., Moeller, S. K., & Ode, S. (2010). Extraversion and reward-related processing: Probing incentive motivation in affective priming tasks. Emotion, 10(5), 615–626. doi: 10.1037/a0019173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. (2005). SVDLIBC [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://tedlab.mit.edu/~dr/svdlibc/
   Google Scholar
• Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M. (2007). Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: A functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1354–1372. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80, 95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, P. (2001). Mining the Web for Synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. In L. De Raedt & P. Flach (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 491–502). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, P. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Sentiment orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In S. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 417–424). Philadelphia, PA: ACL.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, P., & Littman, M. (2003). Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21, 315–346. doi: 10.1145/944012.944013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, P., & Pantel, P. (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 141–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verona, E., Sprague, J., & Sadeh, N. (2012). Inhibitory control and negative emotional processing in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 498–510. doi: 10.1037/a0025308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincze, N. & Bestgen, Y. (2011). Une procédure automatique pour étendre des normes lexicales par l'analyse des cooccurrences dans des textes. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 52, 191–216.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Zhu, Z., Bastiaansen, M., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y. (2013). Recognizing the emotional valence of names: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 125, 118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191–1207. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, H.-L. (2006). Processing of proper names in Mandarin Chinese: A behavioral and neuroimaging study (Ph.D. dissertation). Bielefeld University.
   Google Scholar