Using statistical reasoning performance to reveal information parsing preferences in the mind

References

• Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 241–254. doi:10.1017/S0140525X07001653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 109(4), 722–728. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2008). Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 284–289. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.2.284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2009a). Pictorial Representations in Statistical Reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 369–381. doi:10.1002/acp.1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2009b). How different types of participant payments alter task performance. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 419–428. Retreived from http://journal.sjdm.org/9416/ jdm9416.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2014). The power of representation and interpretation: Doubling statistical reasoning performance with icons and frequentist interpretations of ambiguous numbers. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 81–97. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.861840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L., & Barbey, A. K. (2006). Mental representations of statistical information. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 41, pp. 91–113). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1998). Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L., Fiddick, L., Harries, C., & Base, G. L. (2006). Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(5), 965–976. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50(1–3), 41–77. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90020-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1–73. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D., & Cummins, R. (1999). Biological preparedness and evolutionary explanation. Cognition, 73(3), B37–B53. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00062-1
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C. R., & Levav, J. (2004). Partition-edit-count: Naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 626–642. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. R., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2003). Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Psychological Science, 14(3), 195–200. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103(3), 592–596. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00608.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2001). Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition, 78(3), 247–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00133-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2002). Chances and frequencies in probabilistic reasoning: Rejoinder to Hoffrage, Gigerenzer, Krauss and Martignon. Cognition, 84(3), 353–359. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00051-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108(3), 356–388. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2002). Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.), Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 21–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., & Martignon, L. (2002). Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition, 84(3), 343–352. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00050-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J.-P. P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106(1), 62–88. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macchi, L. (2000). Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 217–236. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• See, K. E., Fox, C. R., & Rottenstreich, Y. S. (2006). Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(6), 1385–1402. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.32.6.1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. a., Over, D., Slovak, L., & Stibel, J. M. (2003). Frequency illusions and other fallacies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 296–309. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 307–327. doi:10.1037/a0015305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar