Segmentation of British Sign Language (BSL): Mind the gap!

References

• Battison, R. (1978). Lexical borrowing in American sign language. Silver Spring: Linstok Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baus, C., Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Quer, J., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Lexical access in Catalan signed language (LSC) production. Cognition, 108, 856–865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Deaf Association. (1992). Dictionary of British sign language/english. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Baquero, S., & Corina, D. (2008). Lexical processing in Spanish sign language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 100–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corina, D. (2000). Some observations regarding paraphasia in American sign Language. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 493–507). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Corina, D., & Emmorey, K. (1993). Lexical priming in American sign language. Poster presented at 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Corina, D., & Hildebrandt, U. (2002). Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in American Sign Language. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, & D. Quinto-Pozos (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 88–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corina, D., & Knapp, H. P. (2006). Lexical retrieval in American sign language production. In L. M. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, & C. T. Best (Eds.), Papers in 30 laboratory phonology 8: Varieties of phonological competence (pp. 213–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Corina, D. P., San Jose-Robertson, L., Guillemin, A., High, J., & Braun, A. R. (2003). Language lateralization in a bimanual language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 718–730. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2003.15.5.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier, K., Schembri, A., & Tyrone, M. (2008). One hand or two? Nativisation of fingerspelling in ASL and BANZSL. Sign Language and Linguistics, 11, 3–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Demuth, K., & McQueen, J. M. (2002). Universality versus language-specificity in listening to running speech. Psychological Science, 13, 258–262. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, M. W. G., & Shih, S. (2006). Phonological priming in British sign language. In L. M. Goldstein, D. H. Whalen, & C. T. Best (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 8 (pp. 241–263). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., & Corina, D. (1990). Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1227–1252. doi: 10.2466/pms.1990.71.3f.1227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. L., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gow, D. W., & Gordon, P. C. (1995). Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 344–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanulíková, A., McQueen, J. M., & Mitterer, H. (2010). Possible words and fixed stress in the segmentation of Slovak speech. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 555–579. doi: 10.1080/17470210903038958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanulíková, A., Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J. M. (2011). Effects of first and second language on segmentation of non-native speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 506–521. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenberger, A. (2007). The possible range of variation between sign languages: Universal grammar, modality, and typological aspects. In P. M. Perniss, R. Pfau, & M. Steinbach (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure (pp. 341–383). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 19, 1–36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacSweeney, M., Woll, B., Campbell, R., Calvert, G., McGuire, P., David, A., … Brammer, M. (2002). Neural correlates of British sign language comprehension: Spatial processing demands of topographic language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1064–1075.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 477–500. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R., & Fischer, S. D. (1989). Looking through the phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing. Memory and Cognition, 17, 740–754.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I. (1994). The importance of childhood to language acquisition: Evidence from American Sign Language. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception (pp. 57–90). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., Lock, E., & Kazmi, H. (2002). Development: Linguistic ability and early language exposure. Nature, 417, 38. doi: 10.1038/417038a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. (1996). Word spotting. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 695–699. doi: 10.1080/016909696387114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M. (1998). Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 21–46. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M. (2007). Eight questions about spoken-word recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 37–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1998). Spotting (different kinds of) words in (different kinds of) context. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 6, 2791–2794.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen, J. M., Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (2001). Rhythmic cues and possible-word constraints in Japanese speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 103–132. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, R. P. (2000). Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (pp. 333–356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., Barrett-Jones, S., & Stoneham, H. (2007). The first signs of language: Phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 3–22. doi: 10.1017/S0142716407070014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. J., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Jezzard, P., & Neville, H. J. (2002). A critical period for right hemisphere recruitment in American Sign Language processing. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11–28. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115, 357–395. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191–243. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., Morgan, G., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 272–283. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., McQueen, J. M., & Morgan, G. (2009). Making sense of nonsense in British sign language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 302–315. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.3.302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitto, L. A., Zatorre, R. J., Gauna, K., Nikelski, E. J., Dostie, D., & Evans, A. C. (2000). Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: Implications for the neural basis of human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(25), 13961–13966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.25.13961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence. London: H.K. Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers 8. Buffalo: University of Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. C., Jr., Casterline, D. C., & Croneberg, C. G. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign language on linguistic principles. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suomi, K., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1997). Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 422–444. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R., & Woll, B. (1999). The linguistics of BSL: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., Emmorey, K., & Gollan, C. G. (2005). “Tip of the fingers” Experiences by deaf signers: Insights into the organization of a sign-based Lexicon. Psychological Science, 16(11), 856–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01626.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., Vigliocco, G. (2010). The link between form and meaning in British sign language: Effects of iconicity for phonological decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 1017–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British Sign Language (BSL) Norms for Age of Acquisition, Familiarity and Iconicity. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1079–1087.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, M. C. W. (2004). Possible-word constraints in Cantonese speech segmentation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 165–173. doi: 10.1023/B:JOPR.0000017225.65288.4b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar