What can megastudies tell us about the orthographic structure of English words?

REFERENCES

• Alvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & De Vega, M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicologica, 21, 341–374.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439–461. doi:10.3758/BF03214334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678–723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.678-723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146–184. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.146
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243–297. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Ferrand, L., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2005). Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 585–589. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01579.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Speech Technology Research, University of Edinburgh. (n.d.). Unisyn Lexicon [Data file]. Retrieved July 19, 2004, from www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/unisyn
   Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2012). The internal structure of chaos: Letter category determines visual word perceptual units. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 371–388. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2013). Segmentation of written words in French. Language and Speech, 56, 125–144. doi:10.1177/0023830912442919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Content, A. (2014). What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels. Orthographic structure biases the perceived length of letter strings. Psychological Science, 25, 143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., Drabs, V., & Content, A. (2014). The role of consonant/vowel organization in perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 40, 938–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2009). Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: The syllable congruency effect re-examined in French. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 40–48. doi:10.1037/a0012944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L., Zorzi, M., Cubelli, R., & Brivio, C. (2003). The status of consonants and vowels in phonological assembly: Testing the two-cycles model with Italian. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 405–433. doi:10.1080/09541440303605
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861–893. doi:10.1080/09541440903356777
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., & Williams, J. N. (1987). The perceptual integrity of syllabic onsets. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 406–418. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90099-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi: 10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 535–557. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2002). Similarity relations among spoken words: The special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 416–423. doi:10.3758/BF03195470
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1143–1163. doi:10.1037/a0023577
   Google Scholar
• Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., & New, B. (2003). Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica, 113, 167–183. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00031-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A. et al. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211–251. doi:10.1080/14640748708401785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1965). Learning to read. Annals of Dyslexia, 15, 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The Overlap Model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–600. doi:10.1037/a0012667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623–647. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0033
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. & Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2008). Feedback-consistency effects in single-word reading. In E. L. Grigorenko & A. J. Naples (Eds.), Single-word reading: Behavioral and biological perspectives (pp. 159–174). New York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono-and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, M. (2000). Processus d'accès à la pronunciation dans le traitement des mots écrits [Processes of access to the pronunciation during written word processing]. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2011). Subsyllabic structure reflected in letter confusability effects in Korean word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 129–134. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0028-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334. doi:10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Acha, J., Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2012). An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1491–1516. doi:10.1037/a0026886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93–116. doi:10.1080/01690960701579714
   Google Scholar
• Maionchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2010). Syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Developmental approach in French children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinus, E., & De Jong, P. F. (2011). Dyslexic and typical-reading children use vowel digraphs as perceptual units in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 504–516. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.509803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marom, M., & Berent, I. (2010). Phonological constraints on the assembly of skeletal structure in reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W., Venezky, R. L., & Taylor, G. A. (1979). Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 107–124. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. C. (2012). The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2221–2230. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.697176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncer, S. J., Knight, D., & Adams, J. W. (in press). Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. doi:10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Araújo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Differential processing of consonants and vowels in lexical access through reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223–1227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02228.x
   Google Scholar
• New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 45–52. doi:10.3758/BF03193811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & Van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 335–359). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peereman, R., Brand, M., & Rey, A. (2006). Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: Searching for sounds in printed pseudowords. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 38–44. doi:10.3758/BF03193810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127–137. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search for an input-coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 375–380. doi:10.3758/BF03196438 doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691–706. doi:10.3758/BF03205539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461–475. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90038-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277–282. doi:10.3758/BF03212951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units. Cognition, 75, B1–B12. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00078-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouibah, A., & Taft, M. (2001). The role of syllabic structure in French word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 373–381. doi:10.3758/BF03194932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy?. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance, XII: The Psychology of Reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & Network, collaboration with C. A. A. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1985). Phonological reading: From patterns of impairment to possible procedures. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Colheart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 361–397). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, E., Kandel, S., Guerassimovitch, H., & Ferrand, L. (2012). Graphemic cohesion effect in reading and writing complex graphemes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 770–791. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.586534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71–89. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90026-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1248–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sze, W. P., Liow, S. J. R., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 263–273. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21–39. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90544-9
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1987). Morphological processing: The BOSS re-ermerges. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII (pp. 265–279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Exeter: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS - Sublexical units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1004–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., Álvarez, C. J., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Cross-language differences in the use of internal orthographic structure when reading polysyllabic words. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 49–63. doi:10.1075/ml.2.1.04taf
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Krebs-Lazendic, L. (2013). The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 85–97. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1986). The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 476–491. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90039-2
   Google Scholar
• Treiman R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words?. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 282–297). Hillslade: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallée, N., Rousset, I., Boë, L.-J. (2001). Des lexiques aux syllabes des langues du monde. Linx, 45, 37–50. doi :10.4000/linx.721 doi: 10.4000/linx.721
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bosch, A., Content, A., Daelemans, W., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Measuring the complexity of writing systems. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1(3), 178–188. doi:10.1080/09296179408590015
   Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   Google Scholar
• Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285–302. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M., J. (2007). Visual word recognition: Explorations of megastudies, multisyllabic words, and individual differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 502–529. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Liow, S. J., Jalil, S. B., & Faizal, S. S. (2010). The Malay Lexicon Project: A database of lexical statistics for 9,592 words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 992–1003. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.4.992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi:10.3738/PBR.15.5.971 doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 504–515. doi:10.3758/BF03200539
   Google Scholar