The mental representation of plural events

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, J. E., & Clifton, C. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory & Cognition, 26, 599–610. doi: 10.3758/BF03201166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., Pinker, S., Tzelgov, J., Bibi, U., & Goldfarb, L. (2005). Computation of semantic number from morphological information. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 342–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of Aspectual Coercion. Brain and Language, 106, 132–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschenbach, E., Habel, C., Herweg, M., & Rehkämper, K. (1989). Remarks on plural anaphora. In Proceedings of the fourth conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 161–167). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & McClure, K. K. (1997). Parsing of garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 273–306. doi: 10.1080/016909697386862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1999). Taking on semantic commitments, II: Collective versus distributive readings. Cognition, 70, 87–104. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00002-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getner, D., & France, I. M. (1988). The verb mutability effect: Studies of the combinatorial semantics of noun and verbs. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 343–382). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
   Google Scholar
• Husband, E. M., Stockall, L., & Beretta, A. (2010). The online composition of events. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics, 19, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Kelter, S., & Habel, C. (2002). Representing referents of plural expressions and resolving plural anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 405–450. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Resolution of the antecedent of a plural pronoun: Ontological categories and predicate symmetry. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 830–844. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, S., Sanford, A. J., Clifton, C., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2008). Good-enough representation in plural and singular pronominal reference: Modulating the conjunction cost. In J. Gundel & N. Hedberg (Eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 123–142). Oxford: Elsevier Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48, 243–279. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90042-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII (pp. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constrains on the formation of plural reference objects: The influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D. (2014). The processing of plural expressions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8, 319–329.
   Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 464–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., George, G. E., & Warren, T. (2014). The conceptual representation of number. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1349–1365. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2010). Evidence for distributivity effects in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 782–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., & Warren, T. (2011). Building complex reference objects from dual sets. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 443–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Frisson, S. P. (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 556–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., McElree, B., Frisson, S., Chen, L., & Traxler, M. J. (2006). Underspecification and aspectual coercion. Discourse Processes, 42, 131–155. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñango, M. M., Winnick, A., Ullah, R., & Zurif, E. (2006). Time-course of semantic composition: The case of Aspectual coercion. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 233–244. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9013-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, A., Dickey, M., & Rips, L. (2004, August). The time-course and cost of telicity inferences. Proceeding of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, U., Anderssen, J., & Yatsushiro, J. (2005). The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence (pp. 409–430). Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Todorova, M., Straub, K., Badecker, W., & Frank, R. (2000, August 13–15). Aspectual Coercion and the Online Computation of Sentential Aspect. Proceedings of the Twenty second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar