The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis

REFERENCES

• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut. Psychological Science, 9(3), 238–240. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: Large scale analysis of lexical processes. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 90–115). Hove, East Sussex: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 424–434. doi:10.3758/BF03195471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berk, K. N. (1977). Tolerance and condition in regression computations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72(360), 863–866. doi: 10.2307/2286476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 63–85. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE 5(6), e10729. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Dent, K., You, W., & Wu, G. (2009). Age of acquisition affects early orthographic processing during Chinese character recognition. Acta Psychologica, 130(3), 196–203. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., & Peng, D. (2001). 汉语双字多义词的识别优势效应 [The effects of polysemy in two-character word identification]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33(4), 300–304.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., You, W., & Zhou, H. (2007). 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应: 语义假设的证据 [Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese : Evidence in favor of the semantic hypothesis]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(1), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. G., Zhou, H. X., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98(3), 499–516. doi:10.1348/000712606X165484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 511–518. doi:10.3758/BF03196186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-C., Vaid, J., & Wu, J.-T. (2009). Homophone density and phonological frequency in Chinese word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7-8), 967–982. doi: 10.1080/01690960902804515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., & Ye, S.-L. (2009). 汉字辨识理论模型中的部件表微 [Radical representation in models of Chinese character recognition]. Research in Applied Psychology, 43, 177–205. doi:10.1080/01690960902804515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, W.-C. (2003). The basic orthographic units in children's recognition of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 47–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. M., Cheng, S. C., & Leong, C. K. (1988). Interaction of reader and stimulus characteristics in children's recognition of Chinese. In I.-M. Liu, H.-C. Chen, & M. J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language, Vol. 1 (pp. 41–56). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249–253. doi:10.1177/014662168300700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2012). Dual-route theories of reading aloud. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 3–27). Hove, East Sussex: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, A. J., & Jackson, D. N. (1972). Suppressor variables, prediction, and the interpretation of psychological relationships. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32(3), 579–599. doi:10.1177/001316447203200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S. P., Horng, R.-Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, phonology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11–21). Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.123.1.71 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12(4), 395–427. doi:10.3758/BF03201693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(4), 674–691. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.4.674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, J.-P. (2007). 字解: 字形图解字典 [A compendium of Chinese characters]. Singapore: Chinese Heritage Lodge.
   Google Scholar
• Halderman, L. K., Ashby, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2012). Phonology: An early and integral role in identifying words. In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition volume 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 207–228). Hove, East Sussex: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., Bi, Y., Shu, H., & Weekes, B. S. (2005). The interaction between semantic and sublexical routes in reading: Converging evidence from Chinese. Brain and Language, 95(1), 235–236. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honorof, D. N., & Feldman, L. (2006). The Chinese character in psycholinguistic research: Form, structure, and the reader. In P. Li (Series and Vol. Ed.), L. H. Tan, E. Bates, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 237–249). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, P. (1941). The prediction of personal adjustment. New York: Social Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hue, C. W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93–107). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. G. (1978). Doing research the hard way: Substituting analysis of variance for a problem in correlational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(6), 873–876. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.70.6.873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language Teaching and Research Institute of Beijing Language and Culture University. (1986). 现代汉语频率词典 [Dictionary of modern Chinese frequency]. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, C. K., Cheng, P.-W., & Malcahy, R. (1987). Automatic processing of morphemic orthography by mature readers. Language and Speech, 30(2), 181–196. doi:10.1177/002383098703000207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (2009). Chinese. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world's major languages (2nd ed., pp. 703–723). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lichacz, F. M., Herdman, C. M., Lefevre, J.-A., & Baird, B. (1999). Polysemy effects in word naming. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 53(2), 189–193. doi:10.1037/h0087309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-J. C., & Ahrens, K. (2010). Ambiguity advantage revisited: Two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(1), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9120-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, I.-M. (2003). Introduction to Chinese character/word processing. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, I.-M., Wu, J.-T., & Chou, T.-L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59(2), 149–168. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00688-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Peng, D. (2005). 词汇判断中汉语多义词识别的优势效应 [The effects of polysemy for Chinese words in lexical decision]. Studies of Psychology & Behavior, 3(2), 116–120.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2007). Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 192–198. doi:10.3758/BF03193147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendershausen, H. (1939). Clearing variates in confluence analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34(205), 93–105. doi:10.1080/01621459.1939.10502370
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China & State Language Commission. (2009). 现代常用字部件及部件名称规范 [Specification of common modern Chinese character components and component names]. Retrieved June 30, 2012, from http://www.china-language.gov.cn/9/2009_9_27/1_9_4352_0_1254018842817.html
   Google Scholar
• Peng, D., Deng, Y., & Chen, B. (2003). 汉语多义单字词的识别优势效应 [The polysemy effect in Chinese one-character word identification]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(5), 569–575.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, D. & Wang, C. (1997). 汉字加工的基本单元: 来自笔画数效应和部件数效应的证据[Basic processing unit of Chinese character recognition: Evidence from stroke number effect and radical number effect]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 29(1), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Dunlap, S. (2008). Learning to read: General principles and writing system variations. In K. Koda & A. M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 13–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2006). Reading Chinese characters: Orthography, phonology, meaning, and the Lexical Constituency Model. In P. Li (Series and Vol. Ed.), L. H. Tan, E. Bates, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 225–236). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The Lexical Constituency Model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 101–118. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The Constituency Model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a ‘universal’ phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1252–1270. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 487–494. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3
   Google Scholar
• Science Publishers. (1998). 汉字信息字典 [A Dictionary of Chinese character information]. Shanghai: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19(1), 1–30. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C. (1998). Evaluating word-reading models at the item level: Matching the grain of theory and data. Psychological Science, 9(3), 234–237. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L. M., & Zhu, X. (1994). 汉字识别中笔画数与字频效应的研究 [Investigating stroke count and character frequency effects in the visual recognition of characters]. Psychological Science, 17(4), 245–247.
   Google Scholar
• Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8(6), 411–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A linguistic introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sze, W. P., Rickard Liow, S. J., & Yap, M. J. (2014). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 263–273. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2006). Processing of characters by native Chinese readers. In P. Li (Series and Vol. Ed.), L. H. Tan, E. Bates, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 237–249). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., Liu, Y., & Zhu, X. (1999). Morphemic processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 91–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 498–519. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning? Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 41–57. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L.-H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10(3–5), 165–200. doi:10.1023/A:1008086231343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Institute of Linguistics in the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (2008). 现代汉语词典 [Modern Chinese dictionary] (5th ed.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K. (2011). An electrophysiological investigation of the role of orthography in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3), 297–301. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Mecklinger, A., Hofmann, J., & Weng, X. (2010). From orthography to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words. Neuroscience, 165(1), 101–106. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. S.-Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228(2), 50–60. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0273-50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Bever, T. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 589–605. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9228-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., McCandliss, B. D., Shu, H., & Zevin, J. D. (2009). Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 238–257. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, B., & Rohsenow, J. S. (1994). Modern Chinese characters. Beijing: Sinolingua.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, B., & Cao, H. (1992). 汉字识别中的笔画数效应新探兼论字频效应 [A new exploration on the effect of stroke number in the identification of Chinese characters]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 24(2), 120–126.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1245–1265. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. (2003). The historical evolution of Chinese languages and scripts (L. Zhang, Trans.). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University National East Asian Languages Resource Center. (Original work published in 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11(3), 234–238. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar