I “hear” what you're “saying”: Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension

REFERENCES

• Alexander, J. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2008). Reading voices and hearing text: Talker specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 446–459.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 9(3), B89–B100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Sanders, L. D., & Kingston, J. (2009). Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80 ms during visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Biological psychology, 80(1), 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V. (1981). The role of subvocalisation in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(4), 439–454. doi: 10.1080/14640748108400802
   Google Scholar
• Bader, M. (1998). Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 21, 1–46. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9_1
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., & Hale, C. R. (1993). Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 97–144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain & Language, 112, 150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Breen, M. (2014). Empirical investigations of the role of implicit prosody in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(2), 37–50. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12061
   Google Scholar
• Breen, M., & Clifton, C. Jr. (2011). Stress matters: Effects of anticipated lexical stress on silent reading. Journal of memory and language, 64(2), 153–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Callen, V. J., Callois, C., & Forbes, P. A. (1983). Evaluation Reactions to accented English: Ethnicity, Sex Role, and Context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 407–426. doi: 10.1177/0022002183014004002
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, K., Clifton, C. Jr., & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 58–81. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2762
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K. (2008). Sensitivity to Syntactic changes in garden path sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 391–403. doi: 10.1007/s10936-008-9072-4
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., & Luke, S. G. (2011). Context strengthens initial misinterpretations of text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 136–166. doi: 10.1080/10888431003636787
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., & Ferreira, F. (2010). Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 538–544.
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C. C., Zacks, R. T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences by older and younger adults. Discourse Processes, 42, 205–238. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and speech, 40(2), 141–201.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J. G., Tager, H. B., Flusberg, T., Hakuta, K., & Cohenl, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of psycholinguistic Research, 8, 499–518. doi: 10.1007/BF01067332
   Google Scholar
• Drumm, A. M., & Klin, C. M. (2011). When story characters communicate: readers'representations of characters’ linguistic exchanges. Memory & cognition, 39(7), 1348–1357. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0096-x
   Google Scholar
• Edfelt, A. W. (1960). Silent speech and silent reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (1977). Students’ reaction to Irish regional accent. Language & Speech, 20, 280–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The “good-enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Filik, R., & Barber, E. (2011) Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader's regional accent. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e25782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025782
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D. (2002, April). Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. Paper presented at the meeting of Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1984). The effect of familiarity on comprehension of the non-native speech. Language and Speech, 34, 65–89.
   Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clause. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 161–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Piantadosi, S. T., Brink, K., Bergen, L., Lim, E., & Saxe, R. (2013). A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation. Psychological science, 24(7), 1079–1088. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463705
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. A. F. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality and syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   Google Scholar
• Giles, H. (1972). Evaluation of personality content from accented speech as a function of listeners’ social attitudes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 168–170. doi:10.2466/pms.1972.34.1.168
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565. doi: 10.3758/BF03196313
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379–401. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2714
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 97–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 1304–1321.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 13, 425–430. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00475
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, T. L. (2010). Auditory imagery: Empirical findings. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 302–329. doi: 10.1037/a0018436
   Google Scholar
• Huey, E. B. (1968). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013). Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 42, 393–411. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9224-4
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M., & Matt, M. C. (1977). If you speak slowly, do people read your prose slowly? Person-particular speech recoding during reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 250–252. doi: 10.3758/BF03336990
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., Magliano, J. P., & Rapp, D. N. (2009). Those voices in your head: Activation of auditory images during reading. Cognition, 112, 457–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. A. (1975). Vocalization and suppression effects in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(3), 304–316. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80074-0
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086–21090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013a). Integrating meaning and structure in L1–L2 and L2–L1 translations. Second Language Research, 29, 233–256. doi: 10.1177/0267658312462019
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013b). Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 518–537. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000351
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01157.x
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114, 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477–494. doi: 10.3758/BF03197249
   Google Scholar
• Patson, N. D., Darowski, E. S., Moon, N., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: Evidence from a paraphrasing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 280–285.
   Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119–124. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429
   Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 164–167. doi: 10.3758/BF03206477
   Google Scholar
• Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.). (2005). Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. E. Jr. (2012). The psychology of reading. New York: Psychology Press. ISBN: 978-1-84872-975-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recopition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2(9), 437–442. doi: 10.3758/BF03208784
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 104–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C. Jr. (1980). Subvocalization and reading for meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(5), 573–582. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90628-3
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, K. O., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32, 244–259. doi: 10.3758/BF03196856
   Google Scholar
• Speer, S. R., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 249–271. doi: 10.1007/BF01708573
   Google Scholar
• Stites, M., Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The psychologist said quickly, “dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!” Memory and Cognition, 41, 137–151. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7
   Google Scholar
• Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 201–216. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.201
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 69–90. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, J. A., & McElree, B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
   Google Scholar
• van Gompel, R. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Jacob, G. (2006). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 335–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Vornik, L., Sharman, S., & Garry, M. (2003). The power of the spoken word: Sociolinguistics cues influence the misinformation effect. Memory, 11, 101–109. doi: 10.1080/741938170
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension. Studia Linguistica, 59(2–3), 279–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00130.x
   Google Scholar
• Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36, 559–570. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3650559
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250–271. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121, 447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., & Christianson, K. (2014, September). Mechanisms underlying auditory perceptual simulation: reading speed or speech biases? Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Edinburg, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., & Christianson, K. (2015, in preparation). Comparison of attitudes towards native and non-native English speech.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). San Diego, CA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. In M. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 165–180). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1142–1150. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.661
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   Google Scholar