What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults

REFERENCES

• Anders, T. R., Fozard, J. L., & Lillyquist, T. D. (1972). Effects of age upon retrieval from short-term memory. Developmental Psychology, 6(2), 214–217.
   Google Scholar
• Audacity Team. (2013). Audacity (Version 2.0.3) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from http://audacityteam.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G., & Townsend, D. J. (1979). Perceptual mechanisms and formal properties of main and subordinate clauses. In W. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker, (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 159–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Brain & Behavioral Sciences, 22, 77–126.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (2002). Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A reply to MacDonald and Christiansen. Psychological Review, 109, 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. (1976). Dissociations of algorithmic and heuristic processes in sentence comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K. (2008). Sensitivity to syntactic changes in garden path sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 391–403. doi:10.1007/s10936-008-9072-4
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Luke, S. G., & Ferreira, F. (2010). Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 538–544. doi:10.1037/a0018027
   Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C., Zacks, R., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences by older and younger adults. Discourse Processes, 42, 205–238. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 497–505.
   Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2010). Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(4), 345–374. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7
   Google Scholar
• Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Glisky, E. L. (2007). Changes in cognitive function in human aging. In D. R. Riddle (Ed.), Brain aging: Models, methods, mechanisms (pp. 1–15). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, V. P., & Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inferences. Psychology and Aging, 7, 56–64. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.56
   Google Scholar
• Haldane, J. B. S. (1956). The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Annals of Human Genetics, 20, 309–311.
   Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention & performance, XVII, cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409–416. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80040-3
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S. (1986). Inferential processing and the comprehension of idioms. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0101_3
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S. (1992). Adults’ sentence fragments: Who, what, when, where, and why. Communication Research, 19, 444–458. doi:10.1177/009365092019004003
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. (2004). Eye-fixation patterns of high and low-span young and older adults: Down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging, 19, 157–170. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.157
   Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard, M. M., Titone, D. A., & Wingfield, A. (1999). The influence of prosodic structure on the interpretation of temporary syntactic ambiguity by young and elderly listeners. Experimental Aging Research, 25, 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013a). Integrating meaning and structure in L1–L2 and L2–L1 translations. Second Language Research, 29, 233–256. doi:10.1177/0267658312462019
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. H., & Christianson, K. (2013b). Second language sentence processing in reading for comprehension and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 518–537. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000351
   Google Scholar
• Obler, L. K., Fein, D., Nicholas, M., & Albert, M. L. (1991). Auditory comprehension and aging: decline in syntactic processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 433–452. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005865
   Google Scholar
• Patson, P. D., Darowski, E. S., Moon, N., & Ferreira, F. (2009). Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: Evidence from a paraphrasing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 280–285. doi:10.1037/a0014276
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Supp 2), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 940–961.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T., & Siloni, T. (2005). The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 389–436.
   Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   Google Scholar
• Schaie, K. W. (1994). The course of adult intellectual development. American Psychologist, 49, 304–313. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.4.304
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013). Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(2), 104–120. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P. (2007). Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery. Cognition, 105, 477–488. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.009
   Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2001). The preservation of structure in language comprehension: Is reanalysis the last resort? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 283–307. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2776
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. (1996). Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing and constraints of memory. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 175–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., Koh, C. K., & Rosen, M. J. (1999). Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging, 14, 380–389. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.380
   Google Scholar