181
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Bad–good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects

&
Pages 482-494 | Received 24 Oct 2014, Accepted 06 May 2015, Published online: 25 Jul 2015

REFERENCES

  • Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–367. doi: 10.1037/a0015854
  • Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2007). When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 832–842.
  • de la Vega, I., Dudschig, C., de Filippis, M., Lachmair, M., & Kaup, B. (2013). Keep your hands crossed: The valence-by-left/right interaction is related to hand, not side, in an incongruent hand-response key assignment. Acta Psychologica, 142, 273–277. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.011
  • Fias, W., & Fischer, M. H. (2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43–54). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition – From single digits to arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
  • Gevers, W., & Lammertyn, J. (2005). The hunt for the SNARC. Psychology Science, 47, 10–21.
  • Gevers, W., Santens, S., Dhooge, E., Chen, Q., Van den Bossche, L., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2010). Verbal-Spatial and visuospatial coding of number–space interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180–190. doi: 10.1037/a0017688
  • Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.
  • Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in the parietal cortex. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
  • Huber, S., Klein, E., Graf, M., Nuerk, H-C., Moeller, K., & Willmes, K. (2014). Embodied markedness of parity: Examining handedness effects on parity judgments. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0626-9
  • Lorch, R. F. & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 149–157.
  • Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatial representation of numbers and space: The reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1197–1207.
  • Nuerk, H-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and MARC (Linguistic Markedness of Response Codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 835–863. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000512
  • Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
  • Santens, S., & Gevers, W. (2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.002
  • Willmes, K., & Iversen, W. (1995, April). On the internal representation of number parity. Paper presented at the Spring meeting of the British Neuropsychological Society, London.
  • Wood, G., Nuerk, H-C., & Willmes, K. (2006). Variability of the SNARC effect: Systematic interindividual differences or just random error? Cortex, 42, 1119–1123. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70223-5
  • Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H-C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.