Masked form priming is moderated by the size of the letter-order-free orthographic neighbourhood

References

• Adelman, J. S., Sabatos-DeVito, M. G., Marquis, S. J., & Estes, Z. (2014). Individual differences in reading aloud: A mega-study, item effects, and some models. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 113–160. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234–254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4(4), 439–461. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.3758/BF03214334
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299–318. doi:10.1037/a0018366
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 152–163. doi:10.1037/a0024953
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.3758/BF03193014
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2003). Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art. Macquarie monographs in cognitive science (pp. 121–170). New York, NY, USA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. doi:10.1037/a0019738
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, W., Verguts, T., & Brysbaert, M. (2005). Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1502–1508. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1502
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1987). Form-priming with masked primes: The best match hypothesis. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 127–146). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39, 211–251. doi:10.1080/14640748708401785
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3–37). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 844–863.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577–600. doi:10.1037/a0012667
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228–244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(5), 623–647. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0033
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2004). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–23). Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 117–142. doi:10.1080/01690960701579722
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, J., & Andrews, S. (2012). Lexical quality and reading skill: Bottom-up and top-down contributions to sentence processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 240–262. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.564244
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Neill, W. T., & Walker, P. B. (2004). Is unconscious identity priming lexical or sublexical? Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 13(3), 512–538. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T. (2014). Fuzzy string processing using Damerau-Levenshtein distance. Retrieved from http://fuzzy-string.com/. Retrieved 2014 http://fuzzy-string.com/
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A. (1995). BNC database and word frequency lists, November 3, 1998. Retrieved from http://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html
   Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0014277
   Google Scholar
• Ktori, M., Kingma, B., Hannagan, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2014). On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 491–505. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.922092
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 618–639. doi:10.1037/a0015278
   Google Scholar
• Massol, S., Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Holcomb, P. (2010). Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: An ERP investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(1), 162–174. doi:10.1037/a0017614
   Google Scholar
• Mathey, S. (2001). L'influence du voisinage orthographique lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 55(1), 1–23. doi:10.1037/h0087349
   Google Scholar
• Mathey, S., Robert, C., & Zagar, D. (2004). Neighbourhood distribution interacts with orthographic priming in the lexical decision task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(4), 533–560. doi:10.1080/01690960344000260
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. L., & Still, M. L. (2012). Orthographic similarity: The case of “reversed anagrams”. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 779–790. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0183-7
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119(3), 517–545. doi:10.1037/a0028450
   Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60–94. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolutto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333–367. doi:10.1080/01690960344000198
   Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65–76. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65
   Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, E. J., Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2012). Transposed-letter priming effects with masked subset primes: A re-examination of the “relative position priming constraint”. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4), 475–499. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.550928
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, E., & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 399–415. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.399
   Google Scholar
• van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). The development of spelling–sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(2&3), 337–371. doi:10.1080/016909698386555
   Google Scholar