The interaction between emotion and executive control: Comparison between visual, auditory, and tactile modalities

References

• Aisenberg, D., & Henik, A. (2012). Stop being neutral: Simon takes control! The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 295–304. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.507819
   Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
   Google Scholar
• Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–336. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. D., Stokes, M. G., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). Modality-specific control of strategic spatial attention in parietal cortex. Neuron, 44, 925–930. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., & Henik, A. (2012). Do irrelevant emotional stimuli impair or improve executive control? Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00033
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Mor, N. (2011). Can emotion modulate attention? Evidence for reciprocal links in the Attentional Network Test. Experimental Psychology, 58, 171–179. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000083
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Moyal, N. (2012). Executive control attenuates emotional effects—For high reappraisers only? Emotion, 12, 970–979. doi: 10.1037/a0026890
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Mor, N., & Henik, A. (2015). Linking executive control and emotional response: A training procedure to reduce rumination. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 15–25. doi:10.1177/2167702614530114
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Moyal, N., & Henik, A. (2015). Executive control suppresses pupillary responses to aversive stimuli. Biological psychology, 112, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Moyal, N., Lichtenstein-Vidne, L., & Henik, A. (2016). Explicit vs. implicit emotional processing: The interaction between processing type and executive control. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 325–339. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.1000830
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, T. A., Chen, C.-C., & McCandliss, B. D. (2008). Threat-related attentional biases: An analysis of three attention systems. Depression and Anxiety, 25, E1–E10. doi: 10.1002/da.20308
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
   Google Scholar
• Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51, 871–882. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029
   Google Scholar
• Etkin, A., Prater, K. E., Hoeft, F., Menon, V., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2010). Failure of anterior cingulate activation and connectivity with the amygdala during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 545–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070931
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 14(3), 340–347. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361886
   Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2008). The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: A multisensory perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 370–407. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2009). The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 380–406. doi: 10.1037/a0015325
   Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. R., Pashler, H. E., & Coburn, P. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 1–31. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000107
   Google Scholar
• Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1992). The effects of intensity and irrelevant location of a tactile stimulation in a choice reaction time task. Neuropsychologia, 30, 91–94. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90017-G
   Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
   Google Scholar
• Kalanthroff, E., Cohen, N., & Henik, A. (2013). Stop feeling: Inhibition of emotional interference following stop-signal trials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00078
   Google Scholar
• Kanske, P. (2012). On the influence of emotion on conflict processing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00042
   Google Scholar
• Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Emotion triggers executive attention: Anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 198–208. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21012
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x
   Google Scholar
• Kron, A., Schul, Y., Cohen, A., & Hassin, R. R. (2010). Feelings Don’t come easy: Studies on the effortful nature of feelings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 520–534. doi: 10.1037/a0020008
   Google Scholar
• Lang, P., Bradley, M., & Cuthbert, B. (2001). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-5. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology. University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens, P., Crompvoets, F., Brokken, D., van den Eerenbeemd, J., & de Vries, G.-J. (2009). A body-conforming tactile jacket to enrich movie viewing. In Third Joint EuroHaptics conference, 2009 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics 2009 (pp. 7–12). http://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2009.4810832
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450–452. http://doi.org/10.1038/nn1051
   Google Scholar
• Melcher, T., Born, C., & Gruber, O. (2011). How negative affect influences neural control processes underlying the resolution of cognitive interference: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroscience Research, 70, 415–427. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2011.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   Google Scholar
• Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, R. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory IV (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
   Google Scholar
• Okon-Singer, H., Lichtenstein-Vidne, L., & Cohen, N. (2013). Dynamic modulation of emotional processing. Biological Psychology, 92, 480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.010
   Google Scholar
• Okon-Singer, H., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2007). Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. Emotion, 7, 147–157. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.147
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 31–45. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C.-H. (1994). Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 185–195. doi: 10.1007/BF00419706
   Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance; common mechanisms in perception and action ( Vol. XIX, pp. 494–519). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/record/122002
   Google Scholar
• Salzer, Y., Aisenberg, D., Oron-Gilad, T., & Henik, A. (2014). In touch with the Simon effect *The first two authors contributed equally. Experimental Psychology, 61, 165–179. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000236
   Google Scholar
• Salzer, Y., Oron-Gilad, T., & Henik, A. (2015). Evaluation of the attention network test using vibrotactile stimulations. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 395–408. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0479-6
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., Teh, K. S., Wang, S., Vijayakumar, R., Ching, A., Nithianantham, D., … Cheok, A. D. (2011). Squeeze me, but Don’t tease me: Human and mechanical touch enhance visual attention and emotion discrimination. Social Neuroscience, 6, 219–230. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.507958
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. R., & De Houwer, J. (2011). Now you see it, now you Don’t: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Acta Psychologica, 138, 176–186. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Schürmann, M., Grumbt, M., Heide, W., & Verleger, R. (2003). Effects of same- and different-modality cues in a Posner task: Extinction-type, spatial, and non-spatial deficits after right-hemispheric stroke. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 348–358. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00303-8
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435. doi: 10.1037/h0028034
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283(5408), 1657–1661. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5408.1657
   Google Scholar
• Soetens, E., Maetens, K., Zeischka, P., & Henderickx, D. (2010). Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 134, 391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330–336. doi: 10.3758/BF03194473
   Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727–735. doi: 10.3758/BF03202722
   Google Scholar
• Van Dillen, L. F., Heslenfeld, D. J., & Koole, S. L. (2009). Tuning down the emotional brain: An fMRI study of the effects of cognitive load on the processing of affective images. Neuroimage, 45(4), 1212–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.016
   Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.453
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, P. W., Benson, R. R., Bandettini, P. A., Kwong, K. K., Howard, R. J., Talavage, T., … Rosen, B. R. (1996). Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent. Neuroreport, 7, 1909–1913. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199608120-00007
   Google Scholar