Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?

References

• Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2013). Processing the in the Parafovea: Are articles skipped automatically? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 649–662.
   Google Scholar
• Angele, B., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2013). Parafoveal–foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 526–538.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A pratical introduction to statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Google Scholar
• Dalmaijer, E., Mathôt, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). PyGaze: An open-source, crossplatform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 913–921. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2
   Google Scholar
• Dare, N., & Shillcock, R. (2013). Serial and parallel processes in eye movement control: Current controversies and future directions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 417–428. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.759979
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Lupker, S. (2006). Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 668–687.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 63, 159–162. doi: 10.1007/PL00008174
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, W., Van der Herten, L., & Verguts, T. (2007). Is masked neighbor priming inhibitory?. Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 113–119. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.113
   Google Scholar
• Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation During Reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777–813. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
   Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Mathôt, S., & Vitu, F. (2014). Tests of a model of multi-word reading: Effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 146, 35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014
   Google Scholar
• Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 166–190.
   Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuospatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221–246). Oxford, UK: North-Holland/Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Google Scholar
• Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 3–26. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000295
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, E., & Stampe, D. (2004). Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 194–211.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. (2013). Synonyms provide preview benefit in English but other semantic relationships do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 619–633. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, E., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 5–35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
   Google Scholar
• Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   Google Scholar
• Vitu, F., Brysbaert, M., & Lancelin, D. (2004). A test of parafoveal-on-foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 154–177. doi: 10.1080/09541440340000178
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1072–1082.
   Google Scholar