Stimulus dependence and cross-modal interference in sequence learning

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Dienes, Z. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants and neural networks. Science, 284(5416), 875a–875. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.875a
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899–912.
   Google Scholar
• Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning in linguistic and nonlinguistic domains. In Emergence of language (pp. 359–380). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bregman, M. R., Patel, A. D., & Gentner, T. Q. (2012). Stimulus-dependent flexibility in non-human auditory pitch processing. Cognition, 122(1), 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Curtin, S. (1999). Transfer of learning: Rule acquisition or statistical learning? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(8), 289–290. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01356-X
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities - Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science, 17, 905–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01801.x
   Google Scholar
• Daltrozzo, J., & Conway, C. M. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: What do event-related potentials tell us? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00437 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00437
   Google Scholar
• Deroost, N., Zeeuws, I., & Soetens, E. (2006). Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 469–480. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0294-5
   Google Scholar
• Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 343–350. doi: 10.3758/BF03196171
   Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., & Berry, D. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(5), 875–887.
   Google Scholar
• Eimas, P. D. (1999). Segmental and syllabic representations in the perception of speech by young infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3), 1901–1911. http://doi.org/10.1121/1.426726 doi: 10.1121/1.426726
   Google Scholar
• Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Nonlinear partial differential equations and applications: From the cover: Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 15822–15826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232472899
   Google Scholar
• Frensch, P. A., Lin, J., & Buchner, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 61, 83–98. doi: 10.1007/s004260050015
   Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 529–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012611199
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Armstrong, B. C., Siegelman, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015). Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 117–125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.010
   Google Scholar
• Goedert, K. M., & Willingham, D. B. (2002). Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 9(5), 279–292. http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.50102 doi: 10.1101/lm.50102
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154–207. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0654
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109–35. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00003-7
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178–186. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01467-4
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253–263. doi: 10.3758/BF03213804
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, M. A., Conway, C. M., & Kellogg, R. T. (2013). Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1491–1500. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0032974 doi: 10.1037/a0032974
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. H., & Howard, D. V. (1997). Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. Psychology and Aging, 12, 634–656. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.634
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., & Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 18, 1029–1039. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1029
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. H., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: Access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 658–680. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.658 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.658
   Google Scholar
• Japikse, K. C., Negash, S., Howard, J. H. Jr, & Howard, D. V. (2003). Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation Cérébrale, 148(1), 38–49. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1264-9 doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1264-9
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J., & Pashler, H. (2007). Is the mind inherently forward looking? Comparing prediction and retrodiction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 295–300. doi: 10.3758/BF03194067
   Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17–30. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1995.9941696
   Google Scholar
• Kemény, F., & Lukács, Á. (2011). Perceptual effect on motor learning in the serial reaction time task. The Journal of General Psychology, 138, 110–126. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2010.542509
   Google Scholar
• Kemény, F., & Lukács, Á. (2013). Stimulus dependence in probabilistic category learning. Acta Psychologica, 143(1), 58–64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83(2), B35–42. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 169–81.
   Google Scholar
• Lany, J., & Gómez, R. L. (2008). Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1247–1252. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02233.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02233.x
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Fernandes, K. J., & Johnson, S. P. (2007). Infant rule learning facilitated by speech. Psychological Science, 18(5), 387–391. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01910.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01910.x
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.77
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. C., Hulse, S. H., & Cynx, J. (1989). Relative pitch perception in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): Further evidence for an elusive phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15(2), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264–275. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264
   Google Scholar
• Perruchet, P., Tyler, M. D., Galland, N., & Peereman, R. (2004). Learning nonadjacent dependencies: No need for algebraic-like computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 573–583. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.573 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.573
   Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46(Pt 2-3), 115–154. doi: 10.1177/00238309030460020501
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X
   Google Scholar
• Reber, P. J., Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Dissociable properties of memory systems: Differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 861–871. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.110.5.861
   Google Scholar
• Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123–138. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.123
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: Implicit motor skill learning? Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 10073–10075. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2747-07.2007
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R. (2002). Constraints on statistical language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 172–196. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2839
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1926
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00075-4
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, J. R., Pollak, S. D., Seibel, R. L., & Shkolnik, A. (2007). Dog is a dog is a dog: Infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition, 105, 669–680. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H. (2012). Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 165–178. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0113-1 doi: 10.5709/acp-0113-1
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Elman, J. L. (1999). Do infants learn grammar with algebra or statistics? Science, 284(5413), 433f–433. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5413.433f doi: 10.1126/science.284.5413.433f
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., MacDonald, M. C., & Saffran, J. R. (2002). Neuroscience: Does grammar start where statistics stop? Science, 298(5593), 553–554. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078094 doi: 10.1126/science.1078094
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, S. A., Ratcliffe, L., & Weary, D. M. (1992). Relative frequency parameters and song recognition in black-capped chickadees. The Condor, 94(3), 782–785. http://doi.org/10.2307/1369266 doi: 10.2307/1369266
   Google Scholar
• Shanks, D. R., & Channon, S. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on “implicit” sequence learning: Learning or performance? Psychological Research, 66(2), 99–109. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-001-0081-2 doi: 10.1007/s00426-001-0081-2
   Google Scholar
• Skosnik, P. D., Mirza, F., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M. M., & Reber, P. J. (2002). Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning. Neuroimage, 17, 1306–1314. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1291
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R., Knowlton, B., & Musen, G. (1993). The structure and organization of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 453–495. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.002321
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. (2014). Implicit transfer of reversed temporal structure in visuomotor sequence learning. Cognitive Science, 38(3), 565–579. http://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12098 doi: 10.1111/cogs.12098
   Google Scholar
• Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (1999). The transfer effect in artificial grammar learning: Reappraising the evidence on the transfer of sequential dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(5), 1322–1333. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1322
   Google Scholar
• Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 614–639. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.614
   Google Scholar
• Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 195–202. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.195
   Google Scholar
• Vaquero, J. M. M., Jiménez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). The problem of reversals in assessing implicit sequence learning with serial reaction time tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 175(1), 97–109. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0523-6 doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0523-6
   Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 328–344. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.328
   Google Scholar
• Vokey, J. R., & Higham, P. A. (2005). Abstract analogies and positive transfer in artificial grammar learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(1), 54–61. doi: 10.1037/h0087461
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition, 28, 366–375. doi: 10.3758/BF03198552
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Hulse, S. H., Shyan, M., & Neiworth, J. J. (2000). Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 291–307. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.291
   Google Scholar