Disgust and biological descriptions bias logical reasoning during legal decision-making

REFERENCES

• Abrams, K., & Keren, H. (2009). Who’s afraid of law and the emotions. Minnesota Law Review, 94, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi:10.1037/h0055756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R., & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease judges’ sentencing of psychopaths? Science, 337, 846–849. doi:10.1126/science.1219569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2004). Reasoning about emotional and neutral materials: Is logic affected by emotion? Psychological Science, 15(11), 745–752. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00751.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, S. (1996). Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by analogy. Harvard Law Review, 109, 923–1028. doi:10.2307/1342258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004). The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(1), 154–166. doi:10.1375/pplt.2004.11.1.154
   Google Scholar
• Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law and human behavior, 30(2), 183–202. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9027-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., & Marois, R. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60, 930–940. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckholtz, J. W., & Marois, R. (2012). The roots of modern justice: Cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 655–661. doi:10.1038/nn.3087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 1–38. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Lorig, T. S., Norris, C. J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003). Just because you’re imaging the brain doesn’t mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 650–661. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. R. (1916). The Place of Logic in the Law. Harvard Law Review, 29(6), 622–639. doi:10.2307/1326498
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Lyon, D. R., & Ogloff, J. R. (1997). The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decisions in a murder trial: Probative or prejudicial? Law and human behavior, 21(5), 485–501. doi:10.1023/A:1024823706560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgments. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Restoration and retribution: How including retributive components affects the acceptability of restorative justice procedures. Social Justice Research, 19, 395–432. doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0023-7
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. (2012). Ideology, psychology, and law. In J. Hanson (Ed.), Ideology, psychology, and law (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanised perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 192–231. doi:10.1080/10463280902954988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeflich, M. H. (1986). Law and geometry: Legal science from Leibniz to Langdell. The American Journal of Legal History, 30, 95. doi:10.2307/845705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horberg, E. J., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Cohen, A. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 963–976. doi:10.1037/a0017423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn, W. R. (2002). The use and limits of deductive logic in legal reasoning. Santa Clara Law Review, 42, 813–862.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Garfield, D. A. (1991). Blood and guts: General and trial-specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on Mock Jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(18), 1459–1472. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality, 18, 431–439. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1950.tb01260.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher, P. H. (1957). Francis Bacon on the science of jurisprudence. Journal of the History of Ideas, 18, 3–26. doi:10.2307/2707577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvaale, E. P., Haslam, N., & Gottdiener, W. H. (2013). The ‘side effects’ of medicalization: A meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 782–794. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefford, A. (1946). The influence of emotonal subject matter on logical reasoning. The Journal of General Psychology, 34, 127–151. doi:10.1080/00221309.1946.10544530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroney, T. A. (2006). Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 119–142. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9029-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 319–321. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). Opinion: The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6, 799–809. doi:10.1038/nrn1768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin, B., Pizarro, D. A., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11, 99–111. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M., & Osherson, D. N. (2009). The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(30), 12554–12559. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902422106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431–444. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachlinski, J., Johnson, S. L., Wistrich, A., & Guthrie, C. (2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges? Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, J. J. (1920). The social contract: & Discourses (No. 660). London: J. M. Dent & sons, Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schleim, S., Spranger, T. M., Erk, S., & Walter, H. (2011). From moral to legal judgment: The influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(1), 48–57. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, A. W. (1936). The Evolution of Punishment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951), 27(2), 219–230. doi:10.2307/1135604
   Google Scholar
• Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Vol. 147. New York, NY: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Duclos, Y., Coulon, O., Mancini, J., Deruelle, C., …Wicker, B. (2012). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 282–288. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Toward socially inspired social neuroscience. Brain research, 1079, 76–85. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, H. (1952). The challenge of a model penal code. Harvard Law Review, 65, 1097–1133. doi:10.2307/1337048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, I., Dziobek, I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: A model-free analysis approach. NeuroImage, 49, 894–904. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, R. L., Doris, J. M., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition, 100, 283–301. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8235–8240. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701408104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2009). An fMRI investigation of spontaneous mental state inference for moral judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1396–1405. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar