Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: An fMRI study

REFERENCES

• Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 267–278. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01501-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7, 268–277. doi:10.1038/nrn1884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 171–178. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01615-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, B., Ciaramidaro, A., Walter, H., & Adenzato, M. (2011). Intentional minds: A philosophical analysis of intention tested through fMRI experiments involving people with schizophrenia, people with autism, and healthy individuals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The evolution of a theory of mind. In M. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 261–277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823. doi:10.1126/science.1115455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 29–34. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 837–844. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.8.837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 119–124. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00031-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 359–366. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage, 12, 314–325. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J., & Kawato, M. (2007). Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters’ actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 206–216. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi, B., & Badcock, C. (2008). Psychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 241–261. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08004214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Ouden, H. E. M., Frith, U., Frith, C., & Blakemore, S. (2005). Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage, 28, 787–796. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C. D., Poline, J., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995). Spatial registration and normalization of images. Human Brain Mapping, 3, 165–189. doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079, 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 77–83. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M. (2013). Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 380–394. doi:10.1177/1745691613489836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobbini, M. I., Koralek, A. C., Bryan, R. E., Montgomery, K. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Two takes on the social brain: A comparison of theory of mind tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1803–1814. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41, 1475–1482. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00317-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. doi:10.2307/1416950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, B. M. (2009). SuperSense: From superstition to religion—the brain science of belief. London: Constable and Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, H. J. (2009). The psychology of paranormal: A researcher’s handbook. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, S. (2010). Evolutionary psychology and intelligence research. American Psychologist, 65, 279–289. doi:10.1037/a0019378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 4876–4881. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811717106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999). Function, goals and intention: Children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 461–468. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01402-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S. F., & Baker, C. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 535–540. doi:10.1038/nn.2303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in intuitive reasoning and belief in complementary and alternative medicine. Psychology & Health, 26, 371–382. doi:10.1080/08870440903440707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 731–744. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Saher, M. (2007). Vitalism, purpose and superstition. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 33–44. doi:10.1348/000712606X101808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Kelley, W. M., Heatherton, T. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs. animated agents. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 199–205. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., & Weisberg, J. (2003). Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 575–587. doi:10.1080/02643290342000005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer, R. L. (2013). Prayer as an interpersonal relationship: A neuroimaging study. Religion, Brain & Behavior. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2013.768288
   Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Gervais, W. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal God. PLoS One, 7, e36880. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A., Hansen, I. G., & Cady, J. (2008). An angry volcano? Reminders of death and anthropomorphizing nature. Social Cognition, 26, 190–197. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekki, T. J. J., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2012). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/acp.2874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekki, T. J. J., Lindeman, M., & Lipsanen, J. (2013). Conceptions about the mind-body problem and their relations to afterlife beliefs, paranormal beliefs, religiosity, and ontological confusions. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 112–120.
   Google Scholar
• Schjoedt, U., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H., Geertz, A. W., & Roepstorff, A. (2009). Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 199–207. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, J., Imamizu, H., Kawato, M., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Activation of the human superior temporal gyrus during observation of goal attribution by intentional objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1695–1705. doi:10.1162/0898929042947874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, R. T., Grelotti, D. J., Klin, A., Kleinman, J., Van der Gaag, C., Marois, R., & Skudlarski P. (2003). The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: Implications for the pathobiology of autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 415–427. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbeis, N., & Koelsch, S. (2009). Understanding the intentions behind man-made products elicits neural activity in areas dedicated to mental state attribution. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 619–623. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svedholm, A. M., Lindeman, M., & Lipsanen, J. (2010). Believing in the purpose of events—why does it occur, and is it supernatural? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252–265. doi:10.1002/acp.1560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, P., Lawrence, A. D., & Barnard, P. J. (2008). Paying attention to social meaning: An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1876–1885. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobacyk, J. J. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23, 94– 98.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48, 564–584. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyse, S. A. (2014). Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, H., Adenzato, M., Ciaramidaro, A., Enrici, I., Pia, L., & Bara, B. G. (2004). Understanding intentions in social interaction: The role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1854–1863. doi:10.1162/0898929042947838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatley, T., Milleville, S. C., & Martin, A. (2007). Understanding animate agents: Distinct roles for the social network and mirror system. Psychological Science, 18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01923.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129, 379–391. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar