1,487
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Changes in face-specific neural processing explain reduced cuteness and approachability of infants with cleft lip

, , &
Pages 439-450 | Received 16 Dec 2016, Published online: 18 Jun 2017

References

  • Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551–565. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
  • Bernard, K., Simons, R., & Dozier, M. (2015). Effects of an attachment-based intervention on child protective services-referred mothers’ event-related potentials to children’s emotions. Child Development, 6, 1673–1684. doi:10.111/cdev.12418
  • Botzel, K., Schulze, S., & Stodieck, S. R. G. (1995). Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 135–143. doi:10.1007/BF00229863
  • Boutsen, L., Humphreys, G. W., Praamstra, P., & Warbrick, T. (2006). Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. NeuroImage, 32, 352–367. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.023
  • Campbell, A. (2008). Attachment, aggression and affiliation: The role of oxytocin in female social behavior. Biological Psychology, 77, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.09.001
  • Carter, C. S. (2003). Developmental consequences of oxytocin. Physiology and Behavior, 79, 383–397. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00151-3
  • Collett, B. R., Stott-Miller, M., Kapp-Simon, K. A., Cunningham, M. L., & Speltz, M. L. (2010). Reading in children with orofacial clefts versus controls. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35, 199–208. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp047
  • De Pascalis, L., Kkeli, N., Chakrabarti, B., Dalton, L., Vaillancourt, K., Rayson, H., … Murray, L. (2017). Maternal gaze to the infant face: Effects of infant age and facial configuration during mother-infant engagement in the first nine weeks. Infant Behavior and Development, 46, 91–99. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.12.003
  • Dozier, M., & the Infant Caregiver Project. (2006). Attachment and biobehavioral catch-up intervention. Unpublished manuscript. Newark, DE: Department of Psychology, University of Delaware.
  • Eimer, M. (2000). Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 145–158. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00038-0
  • Feldman, R., Weller, A., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Levinde, A. (2007). Evidence for a neuroendocrinological foundation of human affiliation. Psychological Science, 18(11), 965–970. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02010.x
  • Frodi, A. M. (1981). Contribution of infant characteristics to child abuse. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 341-349.
  • Galbally, M., Lewis, A., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Permezel, M. (2011). The role of oxytocin in mother–infant relations: A systematic review of human studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 19, 1–14. doi:10.3109/10673229.2011.549771
  • George, N., Evans, J., Fiori, N., Davidoff, J., & Renault, B. (1996). Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 65–76. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00045-3
  • Gomez Gonzalez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7(1), 41–51. doi:10.1007/BF01184836
  • Halit, H., De Haan, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2000). Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces. NeuroReport, 11(9), 1871–1875. doi:10.1097/00001756-200006260-00014
  • Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B., & Domes, G. (2009). Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30, 548–557. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.005
  • Hentges, F., Hill, J., Bishop, D. V. M., Goodacre, T., Moss, T., & Murray, L. (2011). The effect of cleft lip on cognitive development in school-aged children: A paradigm for examining sensitive period effects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 704–712. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02375.x
  • Huffmeijer, R., Alink, L. R. A., Tops, M., Grewen, K. M., Light, K. C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2013). The impact of oxytocin administration and maternal love-withdrawal on event-related potential (ERP) responses to emotional faces with performance feedback. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 399–410. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.11.008
  • Huffmeijer, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R. A., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes. Physiology and Behavior, 130, 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.008
  • Iidaka, T., Matsumoto, A., Haneda, K., Okada, T., & Sadato, N. (2006). Hemodynamic and electrophysiological relationship involved in human face processing: Evidence from a combined fMRI-ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 60, 176–186. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.004
  • IJzendoorn,M.H., V., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). A sniff of trust: Meta-analysis of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on face recognition, trust to in-group, and trust to out-group. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 438–443. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.008
  • Insel, T. R. (1992). Oxytocin — A neuropeptide for affiliation: Evidence from behavioral, receptor autoradiographic, and comparative studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 17(1), 3–35. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(92)90073-G
  • Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. NeuroImage, 15, 353–372. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0982
  • Joyce, C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2613–2631. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.005
  • Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subjects designs. Psychological Methods, 6(2), 115–134. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.115
  • Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334–339. doi:10.1177/0956797613502676
  • Kienberger Jaudes, P., & Mackey-Bilaver, L. (2008). Do chronic conditions increase young children’s risk of being maltreated? Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 671–681. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.007
  • Kotsoni, E., Csibra, G., Mareschal, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of common-onset visual masking. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2285–2293. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.023
  • Kringelbach, M. L., Stark, E. A., Alexander, C., Bornstein, M. H., & Stein, A. (2016). On cuteness: Unlocking the parental brain and beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 545–558. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.003
  • Lorenz, K. (1943). The innate forms of potential experience. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 5, 235–409. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1943.tb00655.x
  • Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
  • Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Macchi Cassia, V., Kuefner, D., Westerlund, A., & Nelson, C. A. (2006). Modulation of face-sensitive event-related potentials by canonical and distorted human faces: The role of vertical symmetry and up-down featural arrangement. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1343–1358. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1343
  • Maupin, A. N., Hayes, N. J., Mayes, L. N., & Rutherford, H. J. V. (2015). The application of electroencephalography to investigate the neural bases of parenting: A review. Parenting: Science and Practice, 15, 9–23. doi:10.1080/15295192.2015.992735
  • Montoya, A. K., & Hayes, A. F. (2016). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods. doi:10.1037/met0000086
  • Mossey, P. A., & Catilla, E. E. (2003). Global registry and database on craniofacial anomalies: Report of a WHO registry meeting on craniofacial anomalies. Geneva: WHO
  • Mossey, P. A., Little, J., Munger, R. G., Dixon, M. J., & Shaw, W. C. (2009). Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet, 374, 1773–1785. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4
  • Murray, L., Hentges, F., Hill, J., Karpf, J., Mistry, B., Kreutz, M., … Goodacre, T. (2008). The effect of cleft lip and palate, and the timing of lip repair on mother-infant interactions and infant development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 115–123. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7160.2007.01833.x
  • Naber, F., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Deschamps, P., Van Engeland, H., & Bakermans- Kranenburg, M. J. (2010). Intranasal oxytocin increases fathers’ observed responsiveness during play with their children: A double-blind within-subject experiment. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(10), 1583–1586. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.04.007
  • Parker, K. J., Buckmaster, C. L., Schatzberg, A. F., & Lyons, D. M. (2005). Intranasal oxytocin administration attenuates the ACTH stress response in monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(9), 924–929. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.04.002
  • Parsons, C. E., Young, K. S., Mohseni, H., Woolrich, M. W., Romer Thomsen, K., Joensson, M., … Kringelbach, M. L. (2013). Minor structural abnormalities in the infant face disrupt neural processing: A unique window into early caregiving responses. Social Neuroscience, 8(4), 268–274. doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.795189
  • Parsons, C. E., Young, K. S., Parsons, E., Dean, A., Murray, L., Goodacre, T., … Kringelbach, M. L. (2011). The effect of cleft lip on adults’ responses to faces: Cross-species findings. PLoS one, 6(10), e25897. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025897
  • Rayson, H., Parsons, C. E., Young, K. S., Goodacre, T., Kringelbach, M. L., Bonaiuto, J. J., … Murray, L. (2016). Effects of infant cleft lip on adult gaze and perceptions of “cuteness”. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. doi:10.1597/16-015
  • Rodrigo, M. J., León, I., Quiñones, I., Lage, A., Byrne, S., & Bobes, M. A. (2011). Brain and personality bases of insensitivity to infant cues in neglectful mothers: An event-related potential study. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 163–176. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000714
  • Rossion, B., Joyce, C. A., Cottrell, G. W., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in visual cortex. NeuroImage, 20, 1609–1624. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010
  • Rozendaal, A. M., Mohangoo, A. D., Luijsterburg, A. J. M., Bakker, M. K., Ongkusowito, E. M., & Vermeij-Keers, C. (2011). Prevalentie van schisis in Nederland en Noord-Nederland in 1997-2007: trendanalyse van gegevens uit drie Nederlandse registraties. Tijdschrift voor Kindergeneeskunde, 79(1), 16–25. doi:10.1007/s12456-011-0003-1
  • Rushby, J. A., Barry, R. J., & Johnstone, S. J. (2002). Event-related potential correlates of serial position effects during an elaborative memory test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46(1), 13–27. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00037-5
  • Sagiv, N., & Bentin, S. (2001). Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: Holistic and part-based processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 937–951. doi:10.1162/089892901753165854
  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1999). Theory testing and measurement error. Intelligence, 27(3), 183–198. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(99)00024-0
  • Schuiringa, H., Van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Orobio de Castro, B., & Matthys, W. (2015). Parenting and the parent-child relationship in families of children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and externalizing behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.018
  • Speltz, M. L., Endriga, M. C., Hill, S., Maris, C. L., Jones, K., & Omnell, M. L. (2000). Cognitive and psychomotor development of infants with orofacial clefts. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 25, 185–190. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/25.3.185
  • Sprengelmeyer, R., Perrett, D. I., Fagan, E. C., Cornwell, R. E., Lobmaier, J. S., Sprengelmeyer, A., … Young, A. W. (2009). The cutest little baby face: A hormonal link to sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces. Psychological Science, 20, 149–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02272.x
  • Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1257–1273. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00190-3
  • Swain, J. E. (2008). Baby stimuli and the parent brain: Functional neuroimaging of the neural substrates of parent-infant attachment. Psychiatry, 5(8), 28–36.
  • Talsma, D., Slagter, H. A., Nieuwenhuis, S., Hage, J., & Kok, A. (2005). The orienting of visuospatial attention: An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 117–129. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.013
  • Voorthuis, A., Out, D., Van der Veen, R., Bhandari, R., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2013). One doll fits all: Validation of the Leiden infant simulator sensitivity assessment (LISSA). Attachment and Human Development, 15, 603–617. doi:10.1080/14616734.2013.820897
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699–727. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.5.699
  • Yamamoto, R., Ariely, D., Chi, W., Langleben, D. D., & Elman, I. (2009). Gender differences in the motivational processing of babies are determined by their facial attractiveness. PLoS One, 4, e6042. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006042