Costly group apology communicates a group’s sincere “intention”

References

• Allport, F. H. (1924). The group fallacy in relation to social science. Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 19(1), 60–73.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933–961.
   Google Scholar
• Bisel, R. S., & Messersmith, A. S. (2012). Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness: Apology giving in work settings. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 425–448.
   Google Scholar
• Blatz, C. W., & Philpot, C. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 995–1007.
   Google Scholar
• Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30(2), 219–241.
   Google Scholar
• Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5), 497–513.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M. D., Short, C. E., & Coombs, W. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661–1692.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, S. J., & Bailey, A. J. (2009). Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature. Human Brain Mapping, 30(8), 2313–2335.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 129(3), 564–583.
   Google Scholar
• Ciaramidaro, A., Becchio, C., Colle, L., Bara, B. G., & Walter, H. (2014). Do you mean me? Communicative intentions recruit the mirror and the mentalizing system. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(7), 909–916.
   Google Scholar
• den Ouden, H. E. M., Frith, U., Frith, C., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2005). Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage, 28(4), 787–796.
   Google Scholar
• Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8), 1742–1752.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2010). On the psychology of financial compensation to restore fairness transgression: When intentions determine value. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Enrici, I., Adenzato, M., Cappa, S., Bara, B. G., & Tettamanti, M. (2011). Intention processing in communication: A common brain network for language and gestures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(9), 2415–2431.
   Google Scholar
• Farrer, C., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15(3), 596–603.
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, T. F. D., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Spence, S. A., Deakin, J. F. W., Tarrier, N., … Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001). Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. NeuroReport, 12(11), 2433–2438.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Hellbernd, N., & Sammler, D. (2018). Neural bases of social communicative intentions in speech. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(6), 604–615.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, B. (2012). Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. Management Science, 58(1), 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A. C., Dodell-Feder, D., Saxe, R., & Knobe, J. (2014). The neural bases of directed and spontaneous mental state attributions to group agents. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e105341.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kralik, J. D., Yun, K., Chung, Y.-A., & Jeong, J. (2019). Neural correlates of public apology effectiveness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13:00229. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00229
   Google Scholar
• Koehn, D. (2013). Why saying “I’m sorry” isn’t good enough: The ethics of corporate apologies. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 239–268.
   Google Scholar
• Komiya, A., Ohtsubo, Y., Oishi, S., & Mifune, N. (2018). Providing compensation promotes forgiveness for replaceable, but not irreplaceable, losses. Journal of Social Psychology, 158(6), 680–693.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vaquero, L. A., Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Lenaerts, T. (2015). Apology and forgiveness evolve to resolve failures in cooperative agreements. Scientific Reports, 5, 10639.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, M. (2002). Breaking the cycles of hatred. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–457.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C. (2016). The evolution of guilt: A model-based approach. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 897–908.
   Google Scholar
• O’Laughlin, M. J., & Malle, B. F. (2002). How people explain actions performed by groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y., Matsunaga, M., Tanaka, H., Suzuki, K., Kobayashi, F., Shibata, E., … Ohira, H. (2018). Costly apologies communicate conciliatory intention: An fMRI study on forgiveness in response to costly apologies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y., & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y., Watanabe, E., Kim, J., Kulas, J. T., Muluk, H., Nazar, G., … Zhang, J. (2012). Are costly apologies universally perceived as being sincere? A test of the costly apology-perceived sincerity relationship in seven countries. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10(4), 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsubo, Y., & Yagi, A. (2015). Relationship value promotes costly apology-making: Testing the valuable relationships hypothesis from the perpetrator’s perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(3), 232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, G. H., Sestieri, C., & Corbetta, M. (2019). The evolution of the temporoparietal junction and posterior temporal sulcus. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.026
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5), 546–550.
   Google Scholar
• Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind. NueroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Hershey, J. C., & Bradlow, E. T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, S., Utikal, V., Fischbacher, U., Weber, B., & Falk, A. (2014). Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: An fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e87654.
   Google Scholar
• Tanibe, T., Hashimoto, T., Tomabechi, T., Masamoto, T., & Karasawa, K. (2019). Attributing mind to groups and their members on two dimensions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 840.
   Google Scholar
• Tettamanti, M., Vaghi, M. M., Bara, B. G., Cappa, S. F., Enrici, I., & Adenzato, M. (2017). Effective connectivity gateways to the theory of mind network in processing communicative intention. Neuroimage, 155, 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.050
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Costafreda, S., Aleman, A., & David, A. S. (2010). Self-reflection and the brain: A theoretical review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies with implications for schizophrenia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 935–946.
   Google Scholar
• Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829–858.
   Google Scholar
• Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48(3), 564–584.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A., Ward, M. K., & Becker, W. J. (2017). Neuroscience in organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 425–444.
   Google Scholar
• Wallter, H., Adenzato, M., Ciaramidaro, A., Enrici, I., Pia, L., & Bara, B. G. (2004). Understanding intentions in social interaction: The role of the anterior paracingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1854–1863.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Collins, J. A., Koski, J., Nugiel, T., Metoki, A., & Olson, I. R. (2017). Dynamic neural architecture for social knowledge retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(16), E3305–E3314.
   Google Scholar