774
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Multiparametric or practical quantitative liver MRI: towards millisecond, fat fraction, kilopascal and function era

, &
Pages 167-182 | Received 24 Sep 2016, Accepted 09 Dec 2016, Published online: 21 Dec 2016

References

  • Wieckowska A, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. Noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: present and future. Hepatology. 2007;46:582–589.
  • Ekstedt M, Franzen LE, Mathiesen UL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44:865–873.
  • Aube C. Imaging modalities for the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39:38–44.
  • Bedossa P, Dargere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2003;38:1449–1457.
  • Poynard T, Lenaour G, Vaillant JC, et al. Liver biopsy analysis has a low level of performance for diagnosis of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(657–663):e657.
  • Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2614–2618.
  • Deng M, Zhao F, Yuan J, et al. Liver T1rho MRI measurement in healthy human subjects at 3 T: a preliminary study with a two-dimensional fast-field echo sequence. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e590–595.
  • Parkes J, Guha IN, Roderick P, et al. Performance of serum marker panels for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2006;44:462–474.
  • Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice Guidelines Committee AAftSoLD. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–1236.
  • Friedman SL. Liver fibrosis – from bench to bedside. J Hepatol. 2003;38(Suppl 1):S38–53.
  • Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, et al. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2004;39:1147–1171.
  • Casado JL, Quereda C, Moreno A, et al. Regression of liver fibrosis is progressive after sustained virological response to HCV therapy in patients with hepatitis C and HIV coinfection. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20:829–837.
  • Chang TT, Liaw YF, Wu SS, et al. Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;52:886–893.
  • Forns X, Charlton M, Denning J, et al. Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2015;61:1485–1494.
  • Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475.
  • Okada M, Murakami T, Yada N, et al. Comparison between T1 relaxation time of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and liver stiffness measurement of ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of cirrhotic liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:329–338.
  • Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. Staging hepatic fibrosis: comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging–preliminary observations. Radiology. 2011;259:142–150.
  • Haimerl M, Verloh N, Zeman F, et al. Assessment of clinical signs of liver cirrhosis using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3T MRI. PLoS One. 2013;8:e85658.
  • Katsube T, Okada M, Kumano S, et al. Estimation of liver function using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:277–283.
  • Stanisz GJ, Henkelman RM. Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:665–667.
  • Kim KA, Park MS, Kim IS, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver cirrhosis using T1 relaxation time with 3 tesla MRI before and after oxygen inhalation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:405–410.
  • Hoad CL, Palaniyappan N, Kaye P, et al. A study of T(1) relaxation time as a measure of liver fibrosis and the influence of confounding histological factors. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:706–714.
  • Heye T, Yang SR, Bock M, et al. MR relaxometry of the liver: significant elevation of T1 relaxation time in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1224–1232.
  • Li Z, Sun J, Hu X, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis by variable flip angle T1 mapping at 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43:698–703.
  • Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;60:69–77.
  • Pavlides M, Banerjee R, Sellwood J, et al. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64:308–315.
  • Ding Y, Sx R, Chen C, et al. Assessing liver function in patients with HBV-related HCC: a comparison of T(1) mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with DWI. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:1392–1398.
  • Kamimura K, Fukukura Y, Yoneyama T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with T1 relaxation time index on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: comparison with signal intensity-based indices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:884–889.
  • Ding Y, Rao Sx, Zhu T, et al. Liver fibrosis staging using T1 mapping on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI compared with DW imaging. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:1096–1103.
  • Besa C, Bane O, Jajamovich G, et al. 3D T1 relaxometry pre and post gadoxetic acid injection for the assessment of liver cirrhosis and liver function. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33:1075–1082.
  • Ding Y, Rao Sx, Meng T, Chen C, et al. Usefulness of T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:959–966.
  • Jia J, Keiser M, Nassif A, et al. A LC-MS/MS method to evaluate the hepatic uptake of the liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in vitro and in humans. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012;891-892:20–26.
  • Nassif A, Jia J, Keiser M, et al. Visualization of hepatic uptake transporter function in healthy subjects by using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;264:741–750.
  • De Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, et al. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology. 2004;230:652–659.
  • Zhao F, Deng M, Yuan J, et al. Experimental evaluation of accelerated T1rho relaxation quantification in human liver using limited spin-lock times. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13:736–742.
  • Zhao F, Wang YX, Yuan J, et al. MR T1rho as an imaging biomarker for monitoring liver injury progression and regression: an experimental study in rats with carbon tetrachloride intoxication. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1709–1716.
  • Yuan J, Zhao F, Griffith JF, et al. Optimized efficient liver T(1rho) mapping using limited spin lock times.. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:1631–1640.
  • Wang YX, Yuan J, Chu ES, et al. T1rho MR imaging is sensitive to evaluate liver fibrosis: an experimental study in a rat biliary duct ligation model. Radiology. 2011;259:712–719.
  • Rauscher I, Eiber M, Ganter C, et al. Evaluation of T1rho as a potential MR biomarker for liver cirrhosis: comparison of healthy control subjects and patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:900–904.
  • Sirlin CB. Science to practice: can T1rho imaging be used to diagnose and assess the severity of hepatic fibrosis?. Radiology. 2011;259:619–620.
  • Allkemper T, Sagmeister F, Cicinnati V, et al. Evaluation of fibrotic liver disease with whole-liver T1rho MR imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2014;271:408–415.
  • Takayama Y, Nishie A, Asayama Y, et al. T1 rho relaxation of the liver: a potential biomarker of liver function.. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:188–195.
  • Singh A, Reddy D, Haris M, et al. T1rho MRI of healthy and fibrotic human livers at 1.5 T. J Transl Med. 2015;13:292
  • Zhao F, Yuan J, Deng M, et al. Further exploration of MRI techniques for liver T1rho quantification. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2013;3:308–315.
  • Chen X, Qin L, Pan D, et al. Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques. Radiology. 2014;271:113–125.
  • Do RK, Chandarana H, Felker E, et al. Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:671–676.
  • Dyvorne HA, Galea N, Nevers T, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters–a pilot study. Radiology. 2013;266:920–929.
  • Girometti R, Furlan A, Esposito G, et al. Relevance of b-values in evaluating liver fibrosis: a study in healthy and cirrhotic subjects using two single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:411–419.
  • Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boelle PY, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2007;46:658–665.
  • Ragheb H, Thacker NA, Guyader JM, et al. The accuracy of ADC measurements in liver is improved by a tailored and computationally efficient local-rigid registration algorithm. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132554.
  • Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology. 2010;254:47–66.
  • Taouli B, Tolia AJ, Losada M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:799–806.
  • Annet L, Peeters F, Abarca-Quinones J, et al. Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:122–128.
  • Bakan AA, Inci E, Bakan S, et al. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:682–687.
  • Bonekamp S, Torbenson MS, Kamel IR. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:885–892.
  • Cece H, Ercan A, Yildiz S, et al. The use of DWI to assess spleen and liver quantitative ADC changes in the detection of liver fibrosis stages in chronic viral hepatitis. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:e307–312.
  • Feier D, Balassy C, Bastati N, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative liver MR imaging with diffusion-weighted, SWI, and hepato-specific contrast-enhanced sequences in staging liver fibrosis-a multiparametric approach. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:539–546.
  • Fujimoto K, Tonan T, Azuma S, et al. Evaluation of the mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values in chronic hepatitis C: correlation with pathologic fibrosis stage and inflammatory activity grade. Radiology. 2011;258:739–748.
  • Girometti R, Furlan A, Bazzocchi M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients. Radiol Med. 2007;112:394–408.
  • Koinuma M, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22:80–85.
  • Peng SS, Jeng YM, Hsu WM, et al. Hepatic ADC map as an adjunct to conventional abdominal MRI to evaluate hepatic fibrotic and clinical cirrhotic severity in biliary atresia patients. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2992–3002.
  • Sandrasegaran K, Akisik FM, Lin C, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1556–1560.
  • Soylu A, Kilickesmez O, Poturoglu S, et al. Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010;16:204–208.
  • Taouli B, Chouli M, Martin AJ, et al. Chronic hepatitis: role of diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and inflammation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:89–95.
  • Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J, et al. Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:553–561.
  • Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:497–505.
  • Luciani A, Vignaud A, Cavet M, et al. Liver cirrhosis: intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging–pilot study. Radiology. 2008;249:891–899.
  • Boulanger Y, Amara M, Lepanto L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients. NMR Biomed. 2003;16:132–136.
  • Regini F, Colagrande S, Mazzoni LN, et al. Assessment of liver perfusion by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance-diffusion-weighted imaging: correlation with phase-contrast portal venous flow measurements. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:365–372.
  • Lu PX, Huang H, Yuan J, et al. Decreases in molecular diffusion, perfusion fraction and perfusion-related diffusion in fibrotic livers: a prospective clinical intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113846.
  • Yoon JH, Lee JM, Baek JH, et al. Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using intravoxel incoherent motion in diffusion-weighted liver MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:110–116.
  • Wu CH, Ho MC, Jeng YM, et al. Assessing hepatic fibrosis: comparing the intravoxel incoherent motion in MRI with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in US. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3552–3559.
  • Bulow R, Mensel B, Meffert P, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for staging liver fibrosis is less reliable in the presence of fat and iron. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1281–1287.
  • Poyraz AK, Onur MR, Kocakoc E, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of fatty liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:1108–1111.
  • Hansmann J, Hernando D, Reeder SB. Fat confounds the observed apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:545–552.
  • Leitao HS, Doblas S, d’Assignies G, et al. Fat deposition decreases diffusion parameters at MRI: a study in phantoms and patients with liver steatosis. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:461–467.
  • Murphy P, Hooker J, Ang B, et al. Associations between histologic features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI measurements in adults. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:1629–1638.
  • Parente DB, Paiva FF, Oliveira Neto JA, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: assessment of steatohepatitis and fibrosis compared with liver biopsy in type 2 diabetic patients. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125653.
  • Guiu B, Petit JM, Capitan V, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 3.0-T MR study. Radiology. 2012;265:96–103.
  • Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(1207–1213):e1202.
  • Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B, et al. Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology. 2010;257:80–86.
  • Dzyubak B, Glaser K, Yin M, et al. Automated liver stiffness measurements with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:371–379.
  • Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, et al. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology. 2007;245:458–466.
  • Salameh N, Larrat B, Abarca-Quinones J, et al. Early detection of steatohepatitis in fatty rat liver by using MR elastography. Radiology. 2009;253:90–97.
  • Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol. 2008;135:32–40.
  • Venkatesh SK, Wang G, Lim SG, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the detection and staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:70–78.
  • Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Morisaka H, et al. MRI-based staging of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging with magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:204–210.
  • Sanchez-Conde M, Montes Ramirez ML, Bellon Cano JM, et al. Impact of liver steatosis on the correlation between liver stiffness and fibrosis measured by transient elastography in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:e278–283.
  • Verveer C, Zondervan Pe, ten Kate Fj, et al. Evaluation of transient elastography for fibrosis assessment compared with large biopsies in chronic hepatitis B and C. Liver Int. 2012;32:622–628.
  • Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2005;41:48–54.
  • Sturm N, Marlu A, Arvers P, et al. Comparative assessment of liver fibrosis by computerized morphometry in naive patients with chronic hepatitis B and C. Liver Int. 2013;33:428–438.
  • Boursier J, De Ledinghen V, Sturm N, et al. Precise evaluation of liver histology by computerized morphometry shows that steatosis influences liver stiffness measured by transient elastography in chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:527–537.
  • Shi Y, Guo Q, Xia F, et al. MR elastography for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: does histologic necroinflammation influence the measurement of hepatic stiffness?. Radiology. 2014;273:88–98.
  • Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, et al. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008;47:380–384.
  • Colli A, Pozzoni P, Berzuini A, et al. Decompensated chronic heart failure: increased liver stiffness measured by means of transient elastography. Radiology. 2010;257:872–878.
  • Huang SY, Abdelsalam ME, Harmoush S, et al. Evaluation of liver fibrosis and hepatic venous pressure gradient with MR elastography in a novel swine model of cirrhosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:590–597.
  • Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Nakazawa T, et al. Hepatitis activity should be considered a confounder of liver stiffness measured with MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:1203–1208.
  • Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S, et al. Liver stiffness is directly influenced by central venous pressure. J Hepatol. 2010;52:206–210.
  • Sagir A, Erhardt A, Schmitt M, et al. Transient elastography is unreliable for detection of cirrhosis in patients with acute liver damage. Hepatology. 2008;47:592–595.
  • Ronot M, Lambert S, Elkrief L, et al. Assessment of portal hypertension and high-risk oesophageal varices with liver and spleen three-dimensional multifrequency MR elastography in liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1394–1402.
  • Chen J, Talwalkar JA, Yin M, et al. Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. Radiology. 2011;259:749–756.
  • Kim D, Kim WR, Talwalkar JA, et al. Advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography. Radiology. 2013;268:411–419.
  • Loomba R, Wolfson T, Ang B, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography predicts advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective study. Hepatology. 2014;60:1920–1928.
  • Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, et al. Hepatic MR elastography: clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations. Radiology. 2016;278:114–124.
  • Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clesiau H, et al. Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: influence of gender and metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol. 2008;48:606–613.
  • Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology. 2010;51:828–835.
  • Foucher J, Castera L, Bernard PH, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with failure of liver stiffness measurement using FibroScan in a prospective study of 2114 examinations. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:411–412.
  • Yoon JH, Lee JM, Suh KS, et al. Combined use of MR fat quantification and MR elastography in living liver donors: can it reduce the need for preoperative liver biopsy? Radiology. 2015;276:453–464.
  • Loomba R, Cui J, Wolfson T, et al. Novel 3D magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in NAFLD: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:986–994.
  • Shin SU, Lee JM, Yu MH, et al. Prediction of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: usefulness of three-dimensional MR elastography with echo-planar imaging technique. Radiology. 2014;272:143–153.
  • Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, Hiasa Y, et al. Hepatic elasticity in patients with ascites: evaluation with real-time tissue elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W766–771.
  • Koizumi Y, Hirooka M, Kisaka Y, et al. Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: noninvasive diagnosis by means of real-time tissue elastography–establishment of the method for measurement. Radiology. 2011;258:610–617.
  • Tatsumi C, Kudo M, Ueshima K, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of hepatic fibrosis using serum fibrotic markers, transient elastography (FibroScan) and real-time tissue elastography. Intervirology. 2008;51(Suppl 1):27–33.
  • Mannelli L, Wilson GJ, Dubinsky TJ, et al. Assessment of the liver strain among cirrhotic and normal livers using tagged MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:1490–1495.
  • Chung S, Breton E, Mannelli L, et al. Liver stiffness assessment by tagged MRI of cardiac-induced liver motion. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:949–955.
  • Chung S, Kim KE, Park MS, et al. Liver stiffness assessment with tagged MRI of cardiac-induced liver motion in cirrhosis patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39:1301–1307.
  • Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Kitagawa T, et al. MR elastography of the liver at 3 T with cine-tagging and bending energy analysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2381–2389.
  • Bohte AE, De Niet A, Jansen L, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:638–648.
  • Yoon JH, Lee JM, Joo I, et al. Hepatic fibrosis: prospective comparison of MR elastography and US shear-wave elastography for evaluation. Radiology. 2014;273:772–782.
  • Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1984;153:189–194.
  • Hines CD, Frydrychowicz A, Hamilton G, et al. T(1) independent, T(2) (*) corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:873–881.
  • Meisamy S, Hines CD, Hamilton G, et al. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2011;258:767–775.
  • Kim H, Taksali SE, Dufour S, et al. Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:521–527.
  • Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR, et al. Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:22–29.
  • Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013;267:422–431.
  • Tang A, Desai A, Hamilton G, et al. Accuracy of MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction for classification of dichotomized histologic steatosis grades in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Radiology. 2015;274:416–425.
  • Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, et al. Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology. 2013;267:767–775.
  • Paparo F, Cenderello G, Revelli M, et al. Diagnostic value of MRI proton density fat fraction for assessing liver steatosis in chronic viral C hepatitis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:758164
  • Idilman IS, Keskin O, Celik A, et al. A comparison of liver fat content as determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction and MRS versus liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Radiol. 2016;57:271–278.
  • Idilman IS, Keskin O, Elhan AH, et al. Impact of sequential proton density fat fraction for quantification of hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:617–624.
  • Li TQ, Aisen AM, Hindmarsh T. Assessment of hepatic iron content using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2004;45:119–129.
  • Gandon Y, Olivie D, Guyader D, et al. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI. Lancet. 2004;363:357–362.
  • Schwenzer NF, Machann J, Haap MM, et al. T2* relaxometry in liver, pancreas, and spleen in a healthy cohort of one hundred twenty-nine subjects-correlation with age, gender, and serum ferritin. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:854–860.
  • Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, et al. Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2171–2179.
  • Maris TG, Papakonstantinou O, Chatzimanoli V, et al. Myocardial and liver iron status using a fast T*2 quantitative MRI (T*2qMRI) technique. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:742–753.
  • St Pierre TG, Clark PR, Chua-Anusorn W, et al. Noninvasive measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic resonance. Blood. 2005;105:855–861.
  • Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N, et al. MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood. 2005;106:1460–1465.
  • Galimberti S, Trombini P, Bernasconi DP, et al. Simultaneous liver iron and fat measures by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hyperferritinemia. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:429–438.
  • Storey P, Thompson AA, Carqueville CL, et al. R2* imaging of transfusional iron burden at 3T and comparison with 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:540–547.
  • Wood JC. Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of iron overload. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007;14:183–190.
  • Wood JC, Ghugre N. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of excess iron in thalassemia, sickle cell disease and other iron overload diseases. Hemoglobin. 2008;32:85–96.
  • Karcaaltincaba M, Idilman I, Celik A. Focal sparing of iron and fat in liver tissue in patients with hemosiderosis: diagnosis with combination of R2* relaxometry and proton density fat fraction calculation by MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011;17:323–327.
  • Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature. 2013;495:187–192.
  • Pierre EY, Ma D, Chen Y, et al. Multiscale reconstruction for MR fingerprinting. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:2481–2492.
  • Warntjes JB, Dahlqvist O, Lundberg P. Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T2*, and proton density quantification. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:528–537.
  • Chen Y, Jiang Y, Pahwa S, et al. MR fingerprinting for rapid quantitative abdominal imaging. Radiology. 2016;279:278–286.
  • Farrar Ct, DePeralta Dk, Day H, et al. 3D molecular MR imaging of liver fibrosis and response to rapamycin therapy in a bile duct ligation rat model. J Hepatol. 2015;63:689–696.
  • Polasek M, Fuchs BC, Uppal R, et al. Molecular MR imaging of liver fibrosis: a feasibility study using rat and mouse models. J Hepatol. 2012;57:549–555.
  • Bonny C, Rayssiguier R, Ughetto S, et al. Medical practices and expectations of general practitioners in relation to hepatitis C virus infection in the Auvergne region. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003;27:1021–1025.
  • Siddique I, El-Naga HA, Madda JP, et al. Sampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:427–432.
  • Faria SC, Ganesan K, Mwangi I, et al. MR imaging of liver fibrosis: current state of the art. Radiographics. 2009;29:1615–1635.
  • Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut. 2006;55:403–408.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.