Gastrointestinal reported outcomes following one anastomosis gastric bypass based on a multicenter study

References

• Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric Surgery survey 2018: similarities and disparities among the 5 IFSO chapters. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):1–12. DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-05207-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizza F, Lucido FS, D’Antonio D, et al. Biliopancreatic limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: which is the best? Obes Surg. 2020;30(10):3685–3694. DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04687-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca M, Piatto G, Merola G, et al. IFSO update position statement on one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3251–3278. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MC, Lee YC, Lee WJ, et al. Diet behavior and low hemoglobin level after laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass surgery. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2012;59(120):2530–2532. DOI:10.5754/hge10757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surgery for obesity and related diseases. Off J Am Soc For Bariatric Surg. 2015;11(2):321–326. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Charalampos T, Maria N, Vrakopoulou VGZ, et al. Tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year outcomes of 94 patients. Obes Surg. 2019;29(2):542–551. DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3572-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liagre A, Debs T, Kassir R, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm: weight loss, nutritional outcomes, endoscopic results, and quality of life at 8-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2020;30(11):4206–4217. DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04775-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler Y, Adelson D, Mardy-Tilbor L, et al. Nutritional status following one anastomosis gastric bypass. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(2):599–605. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen MM, Gundogdu E, Guldogan CE, et al. The effect of bariatric surgery on exocrine pancreatic function. Obes Surg. 2021;31(2):580–587. DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-04950-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarshenas N, Tapsell LC, Batterham M, et al. Changes in anthropometric measures, nutritional indices and gastrointestinal symptoms following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) compared with roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB). Obes Surg. 2021;31(6):2619–2631. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05284-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaniel O, Sherf-Dagan S, Szold A, et al. The effects of one anastomosis gastric bypass surgery on the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):14. DOI:10.3390/nu14020304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. An introduction to eq-5d instruments and their applications. In: Methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D Data. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Padwal RS, Majumdar SR, Klarenbach S, et al. Health status, quality of life, and satisfaction of patients awaiting multidisciplinary bariatric care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):139. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-12-139
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(5):S80–s89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, et al. STROCSS 2019 Guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg. 2019;72:156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, et al. Reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(1):75–83. DOI:10.1023/A:1008841022998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimenäs E, Carlsson G, Glise H, et al. Relevance of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instruments for use in upper gastrointestinal disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;221(sup221):8–13. DOI:10.3109/00365529609095544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulich KR, Madisch A, Pacini F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):12. DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-6-12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitsuhashi S, Ballou S, Jiang ZG, et al. Characterizing normal bowel frequency and consistency in a representative sample of adults in the United States (NHANES). Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(1):115–123. DOI:10.1038/ajg.2017.213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pares D, Comas M, Dorcaratto D, et al. Adaptation and validation of the Bristol scale stool form translated into the Spanish language among health professionals and patients. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas: organo oficial de la sociedad espanola de patologia digestiva. Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas. 2009;101(5):312–316. DOI:10.4321/S1130-01082009000500002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hod K, Dekel R, Aviv Cohen N, et al. The effect of a multispecies probiotic on microbiota composition in a clinical trial of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(12):e13456. DOI:10.1111/nmo.13456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LE, Ibarra A, Ouwehand AC, et al. Normative values for stool frequency and form using Rome III diagnostic criteria for functional constipation in adults: systematic review with meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30:161–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias K, Hellström PM, Webb DL, et al. Gastrointestinal physiology before and after duodenal switch with comparisons to unoperated lean controls: novel use of the smartpill wireless motility capsule. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3483–3489. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05452-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black CJ, Houghton LA, Ford AC. Insights into the evaluation and management of dyspepsia: recent developments and new guidelines. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756284818805597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tack J, Talley NJ, Camilleri M, et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1466–1479. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabotti M, Silecchia G, Greco F, et al. Impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1551–1557. DOI:10.1007/s11695-013-0973-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehmeh WA, Baratte C, Rives-Lange C, et al. Acid reflux is common in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease after one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2021;31(11):4717–4723. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05542-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RXN, Rizkallah N, Chiappetta S, et al. Surgical management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass — a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2022;32(12):4057–4065. DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06301-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermansaravi M, Parmar C, Chiappetta S, et al. Patient selection in one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass—an expert modified delphi consensus. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2512–2524. DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06124-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherf-Dagan S, Sinai T, Goldenshluger A, et al. Nutritional assessment and preparation for adult bariatric surgery candidates: clinical practice. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(3):1020–1031. DOI:10.1093/advances/nmaa121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–2967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasdighi E, Barzin M, Mahawar KK, et al. Effect of biliopancreatic limb length on weight loss, postoperative complications, and remission of comorbidities in one anastomosis gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32(3):892–903. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05848-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad A, Bashir A, Fobi M, et al. The IFSO worldwide one anastomosis gastric bypass survey: techniques and outcomes? Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1411–1421. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05249-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgeidie A, Abou El-Magd ES, Elghadban H, et al. Protein energy malnutrition after one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb ≤200 cm: a case series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(12):1320–1328. DOI:10.1089/lap.2020.0226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P, et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): case series from the Tehran obesity treatment study (TOTS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1714–1720. DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-03741-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das B, Khan OA. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group: a commentary. Int J Surg. 2019;69:67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric Surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):782–795. DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3593-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar