Local farmers’ place-based forest benefits and government interventions behind land and forest cover transitions in Zanzibar, Tanzania

References

• Alessa, L. N., Kliskey, A. A., & Brown, G. (2008). Socio-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (1998). Landscape change: Plan or chaos? Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 155–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier, E. B. (2004). Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 1347–1353.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., & Grainger, A. (2010). The forest transition: Towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy, 27, 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, E., Barbosa, L., & Carvalho, R. (2011). Participatory GIS in a sustainable use reserve in Brazilian Amazonia. Applied Geography, 31, 564–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A., & Liljeblad, A. (2006). Integrating social values in vegetation models via GIS: The missing link for the Bitterroot National Forest (Final report JFSP project no. 04-2-1-114). Missoula, MT: Aldo Leopold Wilderness Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, A. B., & Eva, H. D. (2009). Monitoring 25 years of land cover change dynamics in Africa: A sample based remote sensing approach. Applied Geography, 29, 501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2005). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural research management: Methods and applications. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. G., Reed, P., & Harris, C. C. (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography, 22, 49–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Neville, D. C., & Hatton MacDonald, D. (2010). Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what and how? Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, N. D. and Clarke, G. P. (Eds.). (2000). Coastal forests of Eastern Africa. Gland: IUCN – The World Conservation Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bürgi, M., & Russell, E. W. B. (2001). Integrative methods to study landscape changes. Land Use Policy, 18, 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, A. I. R., Vasconcelos, M. J., Oom, D., & Sardinha, R. (2010). Spatial dynamics and quantification of deforestation in the central-plateau woodlands of Angola. Applied Geography, 31, 1185–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S., Watson, A., Waters, T., Matt, R., Gunderson, K., & Davis, B. (2009). Developing computer-based participatory approaches to mapping landscape values for landscape and resource management. In S. Geertman & J. Stilwell (Eds.), Planning support systems best practices and new methods. Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
   Google Scholar
• CNR (Commission for Natural Resources). (1997). A submission regarding the creation of the Jozani–Chwaka Bay National Park to replace areas of Jozani forest reserve and Unguja Ukuu forest plantation reserve. Zanzibar Town: Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J., Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P., Weiner, D., Olson, R., Muchemi, J., … Chambers, R. (2006). Overview: Mapping for change − The emergence of a new practice. Participatory Learning and Action, 54, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• DCCFF (Department of Commercial Crops, Fruits and Forestry). (2008). Zanzibar National Forest Resources Management Plan (2008–2020). Zanzibar: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ebdon, D. (1985). Statistics in geography. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Eilola, S., Käyhkö, N., & Fagerholm, N. (in press). Linking farmers’ knowledge, farming strategies and consequent cultivation patterns into the identification of healthy agroecosystem characteristics at local scales. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). (2011). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., & Käyhkö, N. (2009). Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in coastal Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia, 187, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2008). Forests and Energy, Key Issues (FAO Forestry Paper 154). Rome: Author.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, Main Report (FAO Forestry Paper 163). Rome: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Farina, A. (2006). Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, K. A., Ojeda-Revah, L., Atkinson, E. E., & Eaton-González, B. R. (2012). Changes in land use, land tenure, and landscape fragmentation in the Tijuana River Watershed following reform of the ejido sector. Land Use Policy, 29, 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guariguata, M. R., Sist, P., & Nasi, R. (2012). Multiple use management of tropical production forests: How can we move from concept to reality? Forest Ecology and Management, 268, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In D. G. Raffaelli & C. L. J. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2013). Common international classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on version 4, August–December 2012 (EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003). Retrieved from www.cices.eu or www.nottingham.ac.uk/cem
   Google Scholar
• Hartter, J., Lucas, C., Gaughan, A. E., & Aranda, L. L. (2008). Detecting tropical dry forest succession in a shifting cultivation mosaic of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Applied Geography, 28, 134–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. J., & Sader, S. A. (2001). Comparison of change detection techniques for monitoring tropical forest clearing and vegetation regrowth in a time series. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hett, C., Castella, J.-C., Heinimann, A., Messerli, P., & Pfund, J.-L. (2012). A landscape mosaics approach for characterizing swidden systems from a REDD+ perspective. Applied Geography, 32, 608–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (International Business Machines Corporation). (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25, 152–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käyhkö, N., Fagerholm, N., Asseid, B. S., & Mzee, A. J. (2011). Dynamic land use and land cover changes and their effect on forest resources in a coastal village of Matemwe, Zanzibar, Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 28, 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käyhkö, N., Orjala, M., & Mustelin, J. (Eds.). (2008). Sustainable Landscapes in Zanzibar. Publicationes Instituti Geographici Universitatis Turkuensis AII 172.
   Google Scholar
• Käyhkö, N., & Skånes, H. (2008). Retrospective land cover/land use change trajectories as drivers behind the local distribution and abundance patterns of oaks in south-western Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 88, 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. E., Cohen, W. B., & Schroeder, T. A. (2007). Trajectory-based change detection for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110, 370–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kombo, Y. H., & Kitwana, M. M. (1997). Coral rag soil fertility improvement. Farmers’ indigenous knowledge and practices (Forestry Technical Paper No. 72). Zanzibar: Commission of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Baulies, X., Bockstael, N., Fischer, G., Krug, T., Leemans, R., … Vogel, C.(1999). Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC): Implementation strategy (IGBP Rep. 48, IHDP Report 10). Stockholm: International Geosphere–Biosphere Program and International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Helmut, J., Geist, H. J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 28, 205–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2010). Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27, 108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., … Xu, J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MANR (Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources). (2011). Community forest management guidelines for the development of community forest agreements. Zanzibar Town: Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar.
   Google Scholar
• Mapedza, E., Wright, J., & Fawcett, R. (2003). An investigation of land cover change in Mafungautsi Forest, Zimbabwe, using GIS and participatory mapping. Applied Geography, 23, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A., Neel, M. C., & Ene, E.. (2002). FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Amherst. Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
   Google Scholar
• MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, B., & Lambin, E. F. (2000). Land-cover-change trajectories in Southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertz, O. (2009). Trends in shifting cultivation and the REDD mechanism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 156–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFEA (Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs). (2010). The Economic Survey 2009. The United Republic of Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: Kiuta.
   Google Scholar
• Michon, G., De Foresta, H., Levang, P., & Verdeaux, F. (2007). Domestic forests: A new paradigm for integrating local communities’ forestry into tropical forest science. Ecology and Society, 12, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Mustalahti, I., Bolin, A., Boyd, E., & Paavola, J. (2012). Can REDD+ reconcile local priorities and needs with global mitigation benefits? Lessons from Angai forest, Tanzania. Ecology and Society, 17, 16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCGS (Office of Chief Government Statistician). (2010). Zanzibar statistical abstract 2009. Zanzibar: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Le Maitre, D. C., Milton, S. J., Egoh, B., Maherry, A., … Cowling, R. M. (2010). Multi-functional landscapes in semi-arid environments: Implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1231–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, A. B. (1994). Forest management plan for Unguja Ukuu forest plantation 1996–2000. Zanzibar: Commission of Natural Resources Sub-commission for Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, S., Söderberg, U., Sandewall, M., & Ouadba, J. M. (2008). Land use analysis from spatial and field data capture in southern Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127, 277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C., Mitchell, A., Trivedi, M., & Mardas, N. (2009). The Little REDD+ Book, Global Canopy Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.theredddesk.org/redd_book
   Google Scholar
• Pickels, J. (1985). Phenomenology, science and geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68, 1301–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., & Lambin, E. (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serneels, S., Linderman, M., & Lambin, E. F. (2007). A multilevel analysis of the impact of land use on interannual land-cover change in East Africa. Ecosystems, 10, 402–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse, B. C., Clement, J. M., & Semmens, D. J. (2011). A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31, 748–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sitari, T. (2005). Forestry in the community lifeworld in Unguja island, Zanzibar. In T. Sitari (Ed.), Forestry, community and biodiversity in Zanzibar, 37–58, vol. 3. Turku: Turku University Department of Geography Publications B.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, S. (2008). Reforestation amidst deforestation: Simultaneity and succession. Global Environmental Change, 18, 425–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, S., Quin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M. M. B., … Chen, Z. (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007 – The physical science basis. Contribution of the working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, J. (2004). An assessment of Landsat TM band 6 thermal data for analysing land cover in tropical dry forest regions. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 689–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 127–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamrini, A. S. (2009). The impact of integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs) on local community livelihood and biodiversity conservation. Zanzibar: WWF & Department of Commercial Crops, Fruits and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1037–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törhönen, M. (2004). Sustainable land tenure and land registration in developing countries, including a historical comparison with an industrialised country. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28, 545–586.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Program). (2007). Global environment outlook, GEO 4, environment and development. Malta: Progress Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN-REDD Programme. (2009). Tanzania Quick Start initiative. Retrieved from http://www.un-redd.org/UNREDDProgramme/CountryActions/Tanzania/tabid/1028/language/en-US/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Vejre, H., Søndergaard Jensen, F., & Jellesmark Thorsen, B. (2010). Demonstrating the importance of intangible ecosystem services from peri-urban landscapes. Ecological Complexity, 7, 338–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg, P. H., Neumann, K., & Nol, L. (2011). Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Global Change Biology, 17, 974–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg, P. H., Overmars, K. P., Huigen, M. G. A., de Groot, W. T., & Veldkamp, A. (2006). Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Applied Geography, 26, 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersum, K. F. (2004). Forest gardens as an ‘intermediate’ land-use system in the nature-culture continuum: Characteristics and future potential. Agroforestry Systems, 61, 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemen, L., Hein, L., van Mensvoort, M. E. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2010). Space for people, plants and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 10, 62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. J., Basha, A. U., Mtumwa, S. S., & Mussa, J. M. (1997). Cheju shehia forest management plan (Forestry Technical Paper No. 95). Zanzibar: Commission for Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. R., & Patterson, M. E. (1996). Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: Perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 507–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZFDP (Zanzibar Forestry Development Project). (1997). Zanzibar long-term forestry plan 1997–2006 (Technical Paper No. 72). Vantaa: Oy Edita Ab.
   Google Scholar