References
- Aguiar, S., Mastrangelo, M.E., Collazo, M.A.G., Sans, G.H.C., Mosso, C.E., Ciuffoli, L., … Cáceres, D. (2018). ¿Cuál es la situación de la Ley de Bosques en la Región Chaqueña a diez años de su sanción? Revisando su pasado para discutir su futuro [What is the status of the Forest Law in the Chaco Region ten years after its enaction? Reviewing its past to discuss its future]. Ecología Austral, 28(2), 400–417. In Spanish
- Anseeuw, W., Lay, J., Messerli, P., Giger, M., & Taylor, M. (2013). Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: The experience of the land Matrix. Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3), 521–530.
- Barnaud, C., & Van Paassen, A. (2013). Equity, power games, and legitimacy: Dilemmas of participatory natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 21.
- Bell, B., & Morse, S. (2008). Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable? London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
- Blaikie, P.M. (2008). Epilogue: Towards a future for political ecology that works. Geoforum, 39, 765–772.
- Blaikie, P.M., & Brookfield, H. (Eds.). (1987). Land degradation and society. London, UK: Methuen.
- Borras, J.S., Kay, M., Gómez, C., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement, 33(4), 402–416.
- Borras Jr., S.M., & Franco, J.C. (2013). Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1723–1747.
- Brannstrom, C. (2009). South America’s neoliberal agricultural frontiers: Places of environmental sacrifice or conservation opportunity? Ambio, 38(3), 141–149.
- Bucher, E.H. (1982). Chaco and Caatinga – South American arid savannas, woodlands and thickets. In B.J. Huntley & B.H. Walker Eds., Ecology of tropical savannas (Ecological Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 48–79). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, New York, NY: Heidelber
- Bucher, E.H., & Huszar, P.C. (1999). Sustainable management of the Gran Chaco of South America: Ecological promise and economic constraints. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 99–108.
- Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.
- Chará, J., Reyes, E., Peri, P., Otte, J., Arce, E., & Schneider, F. (2019). Silvopastoral systems and their contribution to improved resource use and sustainable development goals: Evidence from Latin America. Cali, Colombia: Centre for Research on Sustainable Agriculture (CIPAV), Agri Benchmark and FAO.
- Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Ed.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London, UK: Zed Books.
- Delvenne, P., Vasen, F., & Vara, A.M. (2013). The “soy-ization” of Argentina: The dynamics of the “globalized” privatization regime in a peripheral context. Technology in Society, 35, 153–162.
- Durand, L., Figueroa, F., & Trench, T. (2014). Inclusion and exclusion in participation strategies in the Montes Azules biosphere reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Conservation and Society, 12(2), 175–189.
- Fehlenberg, V., Baumann, M., Gasparri, N.I., Piquer-Rodriguez, M., Gavier-Pizarro, G., & Kuemmerle, T. (2017). The role of soybean production as an underlying driver of deforestation in the South American Chaco. Global Environmental Change, 45, 24–34.
- García-Collazo, M.A., Panizza, A., & Paruelo, J.M. (2013). Ordenamiento Territorial de Bosques Nativos: Resultados de la Zonificación realizada por provincias del Norte argentino [Forest Planning Processes: results of the zoning carried out by provinces of the Argentine North]. Ecología austral, 23(2), 97–107. In Spanish.
- García-López, G.A., & Arizpe, N. (2010). Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina. Ecological Economics, 70, 196–206.
- Gasparri, N.I., & Grau, H.R. (2009). Deforestation and fragmentation of Chaco dry forest in NW Argentina (1972–2007). Forest Ecology and Management, 258(6), 913–921.
- Geist, H.J., & Lambin, E.F. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143–150.
- Gordillo, G. (2004). Landscapes of devils: Tensions of place and memory in the Argentinean Chaco. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Grau, H.R., Aide, T.M., & Gasparri, N.I. (2005). Globalization and soybean expansion into semiarid ecosystems of Argentina. Ambio, 34(3), 265.
- Hanna, P., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Human rights, indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(2), 146–157.
- Jose, S., Walter, D., & Kumar, B.M. (2019). Ecological considerations in sustainable silvopasture design and management. Agroforestry Systems, 93(1), 317–331.
- Leake, A., López, O.E., & Leake, M.C. (2016). La deforestacion del Chaco salteño 2004–2015 [Deforestation in the Chaco region of Salta 2004–2015]. Salta, Argentina: SMA Ediciones. In Spanish.
- Messerli, P., Giger, M., Dwyer, M.B., Breu, T., & Eckert, S. (2014). The geography of large-scale land acquisitions: Analysing socio-ecological patterns of target contexts in the global South. Applied Geography, 53, 449–459.
- Paruelo, J. M., Guerschman, J. P., & Verón, S. R. (2005). Expansión agrícola y cambios en el uso del suelo [Agricultural expansion and land use changes]. Ciencia Hoy, 15(87), 14–23. In Spanish.
- Paruelo, J.M., Texeira, M., Staiano, L., Mastrángelo, M., Amdan, L., & Gallego, F. (2016). An integrative index of ecosystem services provision based on remotely sensed data. Ecological Indicators, 71, 145–154.
- Paulson, S., Gezon, L.L., & Watts, M. (2003). Locating the political in political ecology: An introduction. Human Organization, 62, 205–217.
- Peri, P.L., Dube, F., & Varella, A. (Eds.). (2016). Silvopastoral systems in Southern South America. London, UK: Springer.
- Peterson, N.D. (2011). Excluding to include: (Non)participation in Mexican natural resource management. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 99–107.
- Piccolo, A., Giorgetti, M., & Chávez, D. (2008). Zonas agroeconómicas homogéneas Salta-Jujuy [Homogeneous agro-economic zones Salta-Jujuy]. Salta, Argentina: INTA (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria). In Spanish.
- Piquer-Rodríguez, M., Torella, S., Gavier-Pizarro, G., Volante, J., Somma, D., Ginzburg, R., & Kuemmerle, T. (2015). Effects of past and future land conversions on forest connectivity in the Argentine Chaco. Landscape Ecology, 30(5), 817–833.
- Rindfuss, R.R., Walsh, S.J., Turner II, B.L., Fox, J., & Mishra, V. (2004). Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. PNAS, 101(39), 13976–13981.
- Robbins, P. (2001). Fixed categories in a portable landscape: The causes and consequences of land-cover categorization. Environment and Planning A, 33, 161–179.
- Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell (Critical introductions to geography).
- Rulli, M.C., Saviori, A., & D’Odorico, P. (2013). Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(3), 892–897.
- Seghezzo, L., Venencia, C., Buliubasich, E.C., Iribarnegaray, M.A., & Volante, J.N. (2017). Participatory, multi-criteria evaluation methods as a means to increase the legitimacy and sustainability of land use planning processes. The case of the Chaco region in Salta, Argentina. Environmental Management, 59(2), 307–324.
- Seghezzo, L., Volante, J.N., Paruelo, J.M., Somma, D.J., Buliubasich, E.C., Rodríguez, H.E., … Hufty, M. (2011). Native forests and agriculture in Salta (Argentina): conflicting visions of development. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20(3), 251–277.
- Sletto, B.I. (2009). “We drew what we imagined”. Participatory mapping, performance, and the arts of landscape making. Current Anthropology, 50(4), 443–476.
- Soler, R., Pastur, G.M., Peri, P., Lencinas, M.V., & Pulido, F. (2013). Are silvopastoral system compatible with forest regeneration? An integrative approach in southern Patagonia. Agroforestry Systems, 87(6), 1213–1227.
- Stringer, L.C., Dougill, A.J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M.S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11, 39.
- Turner II, B.L., & Robbins, P. (2008). Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for Sustainability Science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 295–316.
- Vallejos, M., Volante, J.N., Mosciaro, M.J., Vale, L.M., Bustamante, M.L., & Paruelo, J.M. (2015). Transformation dynamics of the natural cover in the dry Chaco ecoregion: A plot level geo-database from 1976 to 2012. Journal of Arid Environments, 123, 3–11.
- Vayda, A.P., & Walters, B.B. (1999). Against political ecology. Human Ecology, 27, 167–179.
- Volante, J.N., Mosciaro, M.J., Gavier-Pizarro, G.I., & Paruelo, J.M. (2016). Agricultural expansion in the Semiarid Chaco: Poorly selective contagious advance. Land Use Policy, 55, 154–165.
- Volante, J.N., & Seghezzo, L. (2018). Can’t see the forest for the trees: Can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement? Ecological Economics, 146, 408–413.
- Walker, P.A. (2005). Political ecology: Where is the ecology? Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 73–82.
- Walker, P.A. (2006). Political ecology: Where is the policy? Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 382–395.
- Walker, P.A. (2007). Political ecology: Where is the politics? Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 363–369.
- White, S.C. (1996). Depoliticizing development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15.
- Williams, G. (2004). Evaluating participatory development: Tyranny, power and (re)politicisation. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 557–578.
- Zhang, Y.J., Li, A.J., & Fung, T. (2012). Using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis for conflict resolution in land use planning. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 2264–2273.