2,495
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A long way to go: gender and diversity in land use science

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 262-280 | Received 08 Jul 2021, Accepted 24 Nov 2021, Published online: 21 Dec 2021

References

  • Abramo, G., Aksnes, D.W., & D’Angelo, C.A., et al. (2021). Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101144
  • Abramo, G., Andrea D’angelo, C., & Caprasecca, A., et al. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics,79(3), 517–539 .https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8
  • Andersen, J.P., Schneider, J.W., Jagsi, R., & Nielsen, M.W., et al. (2019). Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self- citation and journal prestige. ELife, 8, e45374 . https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45374
  • Archer, L., Dewitt, J., & Osborne, J., et al. (2015). Is science for us? black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careers. Science Education, 99(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21146
  • Bendels, M.H.K., Müller, R., Brueggmann, D., & Groneberg, D.A., et al. (2018). Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by nature index journals. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0189136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189136
  • Conover, W.J., & Iman, R.L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics The American Statistician. 35(3), 124–129. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2683975
  • Cook, N.J., Grillos, T., & Andersson, K.P., et al. (2019). Gender quotas increase the equality and effectiveness of climate policy interventions. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0438-4
  • Crenshaw, K.W. (n.d.). Demarginalising the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and anti-racist politics University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315582924-10
  • Dawson, L., Brevik, E.C., & Reyes-Sánchez, L.B., et al. (2021). International gender equity in soil science. European Journal of Soil Science, 72(5), 1929–1939. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13118
  • de Mendiburu, F. (2020). agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural research CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae
  • Dion, M.L., Sumner, J.L., & Mitchell, S.M., et al. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–327https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12
  • Dowle, M., & Srinivasan, A. (2021). data.table: extension of `data.frame`. CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=data.table
  • Fisher, M., Nyabaro, V., Mendum, R., & Osiru, M., et al. (2020). Making it to the PhD: gender and student performance in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE, 15(12 December), e0241915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241915
  • Fonjong, L., Fombe, L., & Sama-Lang, I., et al. (2013). The paradox of gender discrimination in land ownership and women’s contribution to poverty reduction in anglophone cameroon. GeoJournal, 78(3), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-012-9452-z
  • Fortin, J., Bartlett, B., Kantar, M., Tseng, M., & Mehrabi, Z., et al. (2021). Digital technology helps remove gender bias in academia. Scientometrics, 126(5), 4073–4081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03911-4
  • Fox, M.F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: graduate education and careers. Gender and Society, 15(5), 654–666. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3081968. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005002
  • Franke, T.M., Ho, T., & Christie, C.A., et al. (2012). The chi-Square test. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214011426594
  • Fu, B., Wang, S., Zhang, J., Hou, Z., & Li, J., et al. (2019). Unravelling the complexity in achieving the 17 sustainable-development goals. National Science Review, 6(3), 386–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz038
  • Fuchs, S., Brewka, M., Allmendinger, J., & Ludwig, W., et al. (1998). Gender Disparities in Higher Education and Academic Careers in Germany and the United States. In Policy Papers (Vol. 7)Washignton, D.C.: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies.
  • Gao, L., & Bryan, B.A. (2017). Finding pathways to national-scale land-sector sustainability. Nature, 544(7649), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21694
  • Genderize.io. (2021). Our data. https://genderize.io/our-data
  • Gross, J., & Ligges, U. (2015). nortest: tests for normality. CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=nortest
  • Hatch, A., & Curry, S. (2020). Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible. ELife, 9(e58654), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58654
  • Hazlett, M.A., Henderson, K.M., Zeitzer, I.F., & Drew, J.A., et al. (2020). The geography of publishing in the anthropocene. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(10), e270. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.270
  • Helmer, M., Schottdorf, M., Neef, A., & Battaglia, D., et al. (2017). . In eLife, 6, e21718. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21718 .
  • Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V.V., Galvez, S.M.N., He, B., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, D.A., et al. (2020). The diversity–innovation paradox in science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9284–9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117.
  • Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C.E., et al. (2018). The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented? PLOS Biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
  • Hopkins, A.L., Jawitz, J.W., McCarty, C., Goldman, A., & Basu, N.B., et al. (2013). Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors. Scientometrics, 96(2), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0893-4
  • Huang, J., Gates, A.J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.L., et al. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117 .
  • Hulme, P.E. (2011). Practitioner’s perspectives: Introducing a different voice in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01938.x
  • Kaplan, J. (2021). predictrace: predict the race and gender of a given name using census and Social security administration data. Github Repository. https://github.com/jacobkap/predictrace
  • Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: pipe-Friendly framework for basic statistical tests. CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rstatix
  • Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C.R., et al. (2013). Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
  • Leclère, D., Obersteiner, M., Barrett, M., Butchart, S.H.M., Chaudhary, A., De Palma, A., DeClerck, F.A.J., Di Marco, M., Doelman, J.C., Dürauer, M., Freeman, R., Harfoot, M., Hasegawa, T., Hellweg, S., Hilbers, J.P., Hill, S.L.L., Humpenöder, F., Jennings, N., Krisztin, T., & Young, L., et al. (2020). Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature, 585(7826), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2705-y
  • Ledin, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, F., & Wallon, G., et al. (2007). A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 982–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401109
  • Lerback, J., & Hanson, B. (2017). Journals invite too few women to referee. Nature, 541(7638), 455–457. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/541455a
  • Maas, B., Pakeman, R.J., Godet, L., Smith, L., Devictor, V., & Primack, R., et al. (2021). Women and global south strikingly underrepresented among top-publishing ecologists. Conservation Letters, 14(4) , e12797. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12797
  • Mammides, C., Goodale, U.M., Corlett, R.T., Chen, J., Bawa, K.S., Hariya, H., Jarrad, F., Primack, R.B., Ewing, H., Xia, X., & Goodale, E., et al. (2016). Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: A stalled process?. Biological Conservation, 198,78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.030
  • Massen, J.J.M., Bauer, L., Spurny, B., Bugnyar, T., & Kret, M.E., et al. (2017). Sharing of science is most likely among male scientists. Scientific Reports 2017 7:1, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13491-0
  • McHugh, M.L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149 . https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018
  • Microsoft-Corporation. (n.d.). Microsoft Excel (18.2104.12721.0). https://office.microsoft.com/excel
  • Minasny, B., & Fiantis, D. (2018). “Helicopter research”: Who benefits from international studies in Indonesia?. The Conversation. Accessed26 10 2021. https://theconversation.com/helicopter-research-who-benefits-from-international-studies-in-Indonesia-102165
  • Morales, M., & Murdoch, D. (2020). sciplot: scientific graphing functions for factorial designs CRAN Repository . https://cran.r-project.org/package=sciplot
  • Nelson, D.J., & Rogers, D.C. (2003). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Washington, DC: National Organization for Women.
  • Nelson, L.S. (1998). The Anderson-Darling test for normality. Journal of Quality Technology, 30(3), 298–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1998.11979858
  • Nuñez, M.A., Barlow, J., Cadotte, M., Lucas, K., Newton, E., Pettorelli, N., & Stephens, P.A., et al. (2019). Assessing the uneven global distribution of readership, submissions and publications in applied ecology: obvious problems without obvious solutions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 56(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13319
  • Pettorelli, N., Barlow, J., Nuñez, M.A., Rader, R., Stephens, P.A., Pinfield, T., & Newton, E., et al. (2021). How international journals can support ecology from the Global South. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13815
  • R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., & Irizarry, Y., et al. (2019). Does STEM stand out? examining racial/ethnic gaps in persistence across postsecondary fields. Educational Researcher, 48(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19831006.
  • RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: integrated development environment for R (1.2.5033). RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com/
  • Santamaría, L., & Mihaljević, H. (2018). Comparison and benchmark of name-to- gender inference services. PeerJ Computer Science, 2018(7), e156. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.156
  • Schucan Bird, K. (2011). Do women publish fewer journal articles than men? sex differences in publication productivity in the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(6), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.596387
  • Shamseer, L., Bourgeault, I., Grunfeld, E., Moore, A., Peer, N., Straus, S.E., & Tricco, A.C., et al. (2021). Will COVID-19 result in a giant step backwards for women in academic science? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.004
  • Sheltzer, J.M., & Smith, J.C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(28), 10107–10112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403334111
  • Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., Grimaldo, F., Garcıa-Costa, D., Farjam, M., & Mehmani, B., et al. (2020). Only second-class tickets for women in the COVID-19 race. A study on manuscript submissions and reviews in 2329 Elsevier journals. PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0257919 . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3712813
  • Tao, Y., Hong, W., & Ma, Y., et al. (2017). Gender differences in publication productivity among academic scientists and engineers in the U.S. and China: similarities and differences. Minerva, 55(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9320-6
  • Teele, D.L., & Thelen, K. (2017). Gender in the journals: publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002985
  • Tushingham, S., Fulkerson, T., & Hill, K., et al. (2017). The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974–2016). PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0188403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188403
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. United Nations.
  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. Data Booklet(ST/ESA/SER.A/424).United Nations.
  • van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van Den Besselaar, P., et al. (2012). Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, 93(3), 857–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0712-y
  • Vaughan, K., Van Miegroet, H., Pennino, A., Pressler, Y., Duball, C., Brevik, E.C., Berhe, A.A., & Olson, C., et al. (2019). Women in soil science: growing participation, emerging gaps, and the opportunities for advancement in the USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83(5), 1278–1289. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2019.03.0085
  • Viglione, G. (2020). Are women publishing less during the pandemic? here’s what the data say. Nature, 581(7809), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01294-9
  • Villamor, G.B., Desrianti, F., Akiefnawati, R., Amaruzaman, S., & van Noordwijk, M., et al. (2014). Gender influences decisions to change land use practices in the tropical forest margins of Jambi, Indonesia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(6), 733–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9478-7
  • Vincent-Lamarre, P., Sugimoto, C.R., & Larivière, V., et al. (2020). Monitoring women’s scholarly production during the COVID-19 pandemic. Github Repository .https://github.com/lamvin/manuscripts-tracker
  • Wais, K. (2016). Gender prediction methods based on first names with genderizeR. R Journal, 8(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2016-002
  • West, J.D., Jacquet, J., King, M.M., Correll, S.J., & Bergstrom, C.T., et al. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
  • Whelan, A.M., & Schimel, D.S. (2019). Authorship and gender in ESA journals. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 100(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1567
  • Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag NewYork.978-3-319-24277-4. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
  • Wickham, H. (2021). tidyr: tidy messy data R package version 1.1.4. CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=tidyr
  • Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L.D., Francois, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T.L., Miller, E., Bache, S.M., Mueller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D.P., Spinu, V., & Yutani, H., et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
  • Wickham, H., Francois, R., Henry, L., & Mueller, K., et al. (2021). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation R package version 1.0.7. CRAN Repository. https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr
  • Wickham, H. (2007). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software, 21(12),1–20. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i12
  • Wren, J.D., Kozak, K.Z., Johnson, K.R., Deakyne, S.J., Schilling, L.M., & Dellavalle, R.P., et al. (2007). The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 988–991. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401095