Understandings of Arguing in India and the United States: Argument Frames, Personalization of Conflict, Argumentativeness, and Verbal Aggressiveness

References

• Avtgis, T. A., & Rancer, A. S. (2004). Personalization of conflict across cultures: A comparison among the United States, New Zealand, and Australia. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 33, 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Avtgis, T. A., & Rancer, A. S. (Eds.). (2010). Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Avtgis, T. A., Rancer, A. S., Kanjeva, P. A., & Chory, R. M. (2008). Argumentative and aggressive communication in Bulgaria: Testing for conceptual and methodological equivalence. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 17–24. doi:10.1080/17475750802077354
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, M. (2004). Role stress among women in the Indian information technology sector. Women in Management Review, 19, 356–363. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/0964942041056341210.1108/09649420410563412
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, A. K., & Dhruvarajan, R. (2001). Ageing in India: Drifting intergenerational relations, challenges, and options. Ageing and Society, 21, 621–640. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X0100842X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, E. A. H. (1931). The caste system of northern India. New Delhi: Isha.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chella, G. (2007). The changing face of Indian work culture. The Hindu Business Online. Retrieved from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/09/10/stories/2007091051810900.htm
   Google Scholar
• Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J. A. (2007). Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. doi:10.1177/0146167206298568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Hample, D., & Paglieri, F. (2011). A test of the argument engagement model in Romania. In F. Zenker (Ed.), Argument cultures: Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18–21. Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M. (2013). The difference in verbal aggressiveness between the United States and Thailand. Communication Research Reports, 30, 264–269. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.806255
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M., Braziunaite, R., Homsey, D., Pillai, G., Saxena, J., Saldanha, A., … Agarwal, K. (2009). Organizational dissent and argumentativeness: A comparative analysis between American and Indian organizations. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38, 175–191. doi:10.1080/17475759.2009.505057
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M., Oommen, D., Hicks, M. V., Holody, K. J., Anarbaeva, S., Yoon, K., … Aljahli, A. I. (2010). The effects of self-construal and religiousness on argumentativeness: A cross-cultural analysis. Communication Studies, 61, 135–155. doi:10.1080/10510971003603994
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, S. M., Otten, R., Ball, M., Grimes, T., Ainsworth, B., Begley, K., & Corzo, L. (2013). Argumentativeness and political participation: A cross-cultural analysis in the United States and Turkey. Communication Studies, 64, 18–32. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.727942
   Google Scholar
• Dhar, S. (2014, March 8). Indian men spend a mere 19 minutes a day on housework. Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Indian-men-spend-a-mere-19-minutes-a-day-on-housework/articleshow/31636967.cms
   Google Scholar
• El Nasser, H., & Overberg, P. (2011). Census tracks 20 years of sweeping change. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/2011-08-10-census-20-years-change_n.htm
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2012). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, M. (2011, June 29). Indian women most stressed in the world: Nielsen survey. Economic Times. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-06-29/news/29717262_1_indian-women-stress-workplaces
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, J. K., & Dutta, J. (2008). Risk, conflict between parents and child adjustment in families experiencing persistent poverty in India. Journal of Family Studies, 14, 107–123. doi:10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, M. D., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 153–187. doi:10.1080/00220380412331293807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., & Hample, D. (2011). Testing hierarchical models of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 250–273. doi:10.1080/19312458.2011.596991
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (1999). The life space of personalized conflicts. Communication Yearbook, 22, 171–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (2003). Arguing skill. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 439–478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (2005). Arguing: Exchanging reasons face to face. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2010). Taking conflict personally and its connections with aggressiveness. In T. A. Avtgis & A. S. Rancer (Eds.), Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research (pp. 372–387). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (1995). A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. Communication Quarterly, 43, 297–319. doi:10.1080/01463379509369978
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Han, B., & Payne, D. (2010). The aggressiveness of playful arguments. Argumentation, 24, 405–421. doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9173-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Irions, A. (2014). Arguing to display identity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Richards, A. S., & Skubisz, C. (2013). Blurting. Communication Monographs, 80, 503–532. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.830316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Warner, B., & Young, D. (2009). Framing and editing interpersonal arguments. Argumentation, 23, 21–37. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9107-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J., & de Best, J. (2011). Persuasive evidence in India: An investigation of the impact of evidence types and evidence quality. Argumentation & Advocacy, 47, 246–257.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. M., Jain, D., Sadowski, L. S., & Sanhueza, A. I. (2000). Risk practices for severe child discipline in rural India. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 25, 435–447. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/25.6.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72–80. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggression: A review of recent theory and research. Communication Yearbook, 19, 319–351.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61–69. doi:10.1080/03637758609376126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (2011, February 16). India faces a linguistic truth: English spoken here. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/world/asia/17iht-letter17.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, S., Hughes, P., Baldwin, J. R., & Blue, J. (2003). The relationship of individualism-collectivism in India and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 683–700. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2003.08.00210.1016/j.ijintrel.2003.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katriel, T. (1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. J., Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M.-S., & Miyahara, A. (2015). Effects of taking conflict personally on conflict management styles across cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 143–149. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai, F., & Straus, M. A. (1983). Conflict resolution tactics in Japan, India, and the USA. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 377–392. doi:http://www.jstor.org/stable/41585346
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. D. (1999). When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures (Rev. ed.). London: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., Gambles, R., & Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a “work–life balance” approach: An international perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 360–373. doi:10.1080/09585190601165577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2011). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentation theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Portal of India. (2014). Profile. Retrieved from http://india.gov.in/india-glance/profile
   Google Scholar
• Nayar, V. K. (2000). Low intensity conflicts in India. New Delhi: United Service Institution of India.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New York, NY: Simon Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the US Trade Representative. (2014). US-India bilateral trade and investment. Retrieved Revised September 5, 2014. Accessed September 27, 2014, from http://www.ustr.gov/countries-regions/south-central-asia/india
   Google Scholar
• Paglieri, F., & Castelfranchi, C. (2010). Why argue? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation. Argument and Computation, 1, 71–91. doi:10.1080/19462160903494584
   Google Scholar
• Patel, V., & Prince, M. (2001). Ageing and mental health in a developing country: Who cares? Qualitative studies from Goa, India. Psychological Medicine, 31, 29–38. doi:10.1017/S0033291799003098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741–754. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi, R. K. (2004). The Indian caste system. New Delhi: Discovery.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, K., & Ahmad, F. (2014). Indian-Americans form 3rd largest Asian population in the US. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-04-24/news/49378115_1_indian-americans-population-karthick-ramakrishnan
   Google Scholar
• Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A. (2006). Argumentative and aggressive communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., & Hample, D. (2014). Interpersonal arguing in the United Arab Emirates, with comparisons to the United States, China, and India. Unpublished manuscript, Zayed University, Dubai, UAE. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Santibáñez, C., & Hample, D. (2014). Orientations toward interpersonal arguing in Chile. Unpublished manuscript, University Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture, and identity. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, U. (2009). A history of ancient and medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. Delhi: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• The Hindu. (2013). India is now world’s third largest Internet user after US China. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/internet/india-is-now-worlds-third-largest-internet-user-after-us-china/article5053115.ece
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213–235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2014). GDP per capita (current US$). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Hample, D., & Wang, X. (2014, July). A cross-cultural analysis of argument predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, and personalization of conflict. Paper presented to the meeting of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidman, N. (2001). Cultural codes and language strategies in business communication: Interactions between Israeli and Indian businesspeople. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 408–441. doi:10.1177/0893318901143002
   Google Scholar