How Should I Respond to Them? An Emergent Categorization of Responses to Interpersonally Communicated Stereotypes

References

• Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S. R., & Stillwell, A. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., & Macrae, C. N. (1996). The self-regulation of intergroup perception: Mechanisms and consequences of stereotype suppression. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 227–253). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borisoff, D., & Victor, D. A. (1989). Conflict management: A communication skills approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis & code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, A. (2010). Reading ‘a tutorial on membership categorization’ by Emanuel Schegloff. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 257–261.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Condor, S. (2006). Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 1–18.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S. (2001). Women’s discursive construction of a sexual harassment paradox. Qualitative Research Reports, 2, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2005). Discursive psychology. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 257–273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. M. (1951). Stereotype persistence and change among college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 245–254.10.1037/h0053696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963a). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963b). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hakansson, J., & Montgomery, H. (2003). Empathy as an interpersonal phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 267–284.10.1177/0265407503020003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Doosje, B. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: How shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social reality. In C. McGarty, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations (pp. 157–185). Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489877
   Google Scholar
• Jussim, L. J., McCauley, C. R., & Lee, Y. (1995). Why study stereotype accuracy and inaccuracy? In Y. Lee, L. Jussim, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 3–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10495-000
   Google Scholar
• Karlins, M., Coffman, T. L., & Walters, G. (1969). On the fading of social stereotypes: Studies in three generations of college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 1–16.10.1037/h0027994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.10.1037/h0074049
   Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., Butner, J., Li, N. P., Becherk, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2002). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Mapping the domains of the new interactionist paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 347–356.10.1207/pspr.2002.6.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig Kellas, J., & Manusov, V. (2003). What’s in a story? The relationship between narrative completeness and adjustment to relationship dissolution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 285–307.10.1177/0265407503020003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurylo, A. (2012). What are they like? Non-expert definitions of stereotypes and their implications for stereotype maintenance. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9, 337–350.
   Google Scholar
• Kurylo, A. (2013). The communicated stereotype: From celebrity vilification to everyday talk. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ladegaard, H. J., & Fai Cheng, H. (2014). Constructing the cultural ‘other’: Prejudice and intergroup conflict in university students’ discourse about ‘the other’. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14, 156–175.10.1080/14708477.2013.849718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A., Newman, L. S., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Rethinking the role of facilitation and inhibition in stereotyping. Advances in Social Cognition, 11, 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R. & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1922/1965). Public opinion. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2001). The reproduction of culture: Communication processes tend to maintain cultural stereotypes. Social Cognition, 19, 372–394.10.1521/soco.19.3.372.21470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2003). How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 989–1005.10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madon, S., Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998). The accuracy and power of sex, social class, and ethnic stereotypes: A naturalistic study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1304–1318.10.1177/01461672982412005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertins, J., & Baus, R. (2010). A stages of change approach to second language learning and intercultural willingness to communicate. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39, 13–28.10.1080/17475759.2010.520836
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. P., & Warren, K. T. (2000). Different standpoints, different realities: Race, gender, and perceptions of intercultural conflict. Qualitative Research Reports, 1, 51–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ottati, V., & Lee, Y. (1996). Accuracy: A neglected component of stereotype research. In Y. Lee, L. Jussim, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 29–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14, 783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, S. (2010). Testing the cognitive-affective consistency model of intercultural attitudes: Do stereotypical perceptions influence prejudicial feelings? Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39, 105–121.10.1080/17475759.2010.526317
   Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, S. (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counterstereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38, 497–516.10.1177/0093650210384854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, N. (1993). The politically correct phrasebook. What they say you can and cannot say in the 1990’s. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, B. G., Bisanz, G. L., & Kohn, M. (1985). Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1127–1140.10.1037/0022-3514.48.5.1127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotyping process. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Watson.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., Conway, L. G., III, & Tanchuk, T. L. (2002). Selective pressures on the once and future contents of ethnic stereotypes: Effects of the communicability of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 861–877.10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., & Latané, B. (1996). Dynamic social impact and the evolution of social representations: A natural history of stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 46, 64–77.10.1111/jcom.1996.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007b). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semin, G. R. (2000). Agenda 2000-communication: Language as an implementational device for cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 595–612.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L., & Daly, J. A. (1984). Conversational memory. Human Communication Research, 10, 379–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodaux, D. (1994). Beyond political correctness: Are there limits to this lunacy? Lafayette, LA: Huntington House.
   Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: Theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 255–271.10.1080/17475750701737199
   Google Scholar
• Tracy & Robles. 2013. Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3, 87–118.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R. (1997). Some general reflections on ‘categorization’ and ‘sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 49–75). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (1995). PC wars: Politics and theory in the academy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2000). The communication of social support within an on-line community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the senior net community. Qualitative Research Reports, 1, 33–43.
   Google Scholar