References
- Ahn, K. (2011). Conceptualization of American English native speaker norms: A case study of an English language classroom in South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 691–702.10.1007/s12564-011-9169-6
- Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York: Dialogos.
- Alpert, B. (1987). Active, silent, and controlled discussions: Explaining variations in classroom conversation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3, 29–40.
- Bella, D. A. (2003). Plug and chug, cram and flush. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 129(1), 32–39.10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2003)129:1(32)
- Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307
- Blommaert, J., Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication, 25, 197–216.
- Boyd, M., & Markarian, W. (2011). Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25, 515–534.10.1080/09500782.2011.597861
- Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Cazden, C. (2011). Dell Hymes’s construct of ‘communicative competence’. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42, 364–369.10.1111/aeq.2011.42.issue-4
- Chang, Y. (2010). English-medium instruction for subject courses in tertiary education: Reactions from Taiwanese undergraduate students. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 2, 55–84.
- Chen, G., & Chung, J. (1994). The Impact of confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42, 93–105.10.1080/01463379409369919
- Chiu, Y. (2009). Facilitating Asian students’ critical thinking in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 42–57.10.1111/bjet.2009.40.issue-1
- Cho, J. (2012). Campus in English or campus in shock? English Today, 28, 18–25.10.1017/S026607841200020X
- Collins, J. (1996). Socialization to text: Structure and contradiction in schooled literacy. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 203–228). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
- Duff, P. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289–322.10.1093/applin/23.3.289
- Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2010). Learning science through dialogic inquiry: Is it beneficial for English-as-additional-language students? International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 10–21.10.1016/j.ijer.2010.05.003
- Ha, M. (2011). EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in the EMI college classes. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 27–53.
- Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Bride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Hamondsworth: Penguin.
- Kim, E. (2002). Voices of learners from English-medium lectures. Journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Korea, 18, 145–163.
- Kim, K. (2011). Korean professor and student perceptions of the efficacy of English-medium instruction. Linguistic Research, 28, 711–741.
- Lu, Y., & Hsu, C. (2008). Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 75–88.10.1080/17475750802533356
- Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23, 353–369.10.1080/09500780902954273
- Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 325–338.10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00029-2
- Morell, T. (2007). What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 222–237.10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002
- Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21, 19–41.10.1080/02671520500445425
- Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. London: Teachers College Press.
- O’Connor, M., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318–335.10.1525/aeq.1993.24.issue-4
- Oh, H., & Lee, H. (2010). Characteristics of effective English medium instruction and support measures. Modern English Education, 11, 191–202.
- Park, J. S. Y. (2010). Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20, 22–38.10.1111/jola.2010.20.issue-1
- Ryu, M. (2013). “But at school … I became a bit shy”: Korean immigrant adolescents discursive participation in science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 649–671.10.1007/s11422-012-9406-2
- Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.10.2307/412243
- Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
- Watson, D. (1999). ‘Loss of face’ in Australian classrooms. Teaching in Higher Education, 4, 355–362.10.1080/1356251990040304
- Wortham, S. (1992). Participant examples and classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 4, 195–217.10.1016/0898-5898(92)90014-N