Interpreting Cues of Goodness: Thin Sliced Judgment of Malaysians and Chinese towards Political Leaders

References

• Ambady, N. (2010). The perils of pondering: Intuition and thin slice judgments. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 271–278. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2010.524882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538–547. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabady, N., Laplante, D., & Johnson, E. (2001). Thin slice judgments as a measure of interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Benieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 89–101). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198529620.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences – A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher effectiveness from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 431–441. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., & Weisbuch, M. (2010). Nonverbal behavior. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 464–497). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. A. (2012). The basis of cultural differences in nonverbal communication. In L. A. Samovar, R. E. Porter, & E. R. McDaniel (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (13th ed., pp. 4–26). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Predicting elections: Child’s play! Science, 323, 1183. doi:10.1126/science.1167748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carré, J. M., McCormick, C. M., & Mondloch, C. J. (2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. doi:10.1037/a0034726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, H. M. (2008). To what extent, and under what conditions, are first impressions valid? In N. Ambady & J. Skowronski (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 106–128). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., Bernieri, F. J., & Carney, D. R. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and interpersonal sensitivity. In J. A. Harrigan, R. Rosenthal, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 237–281). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198529620.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. A., & Ambady, N. (1999). Nonverbal communication and psychology: Past and future. NJ Journal of Communication, 7, 156–170. doi:10.1080/15456879909367364
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Matsumoto, D. (2015). Evidence for the universality of facial expressions of emotion. In M. Mandal & A. Awasthi (Eds), Understanding facial expressions in communication: Cross-cultural and multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 41–56). doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-1934-7
   Google Scholar
• Jogulu, U., & Ferkins, L. (2012). Leadership and culture in Asia: The case of Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18, 531–549. doi:10.1080/13602381.2012.690301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. C. (2002). Leadership in Malaysia: Traditional values, international outlook. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 15–26. doi:10.5465/AME.2002.8540292
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2010). An Introduction to social cognition. Paper presented at the Berkeley Social Ontology Group, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrm/BSOG2010_IntroSocCog.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kopacz, M. A. (2006). Nonverbal communication as a persuasion tool: current status and future directions. Rocky Mountain Communication Review, 3, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ladkin, D., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, C., Lenz, G. S., Baker, A., & Myers, M. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62, 561–593. doi:10.1017/S0043887110000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. K., Netting, F. E., & Thomas, M. L. (2008). Grounded theory: Managing the challenge for those facing institutional review board oversight. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 28–45. doi:10.1177/1077800407308907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poutvaara, P., Jordahl, H., & Berggren, N. (2009). Faces of politicians: Babyfacedness predicts inferred competence but not electoral success. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1132–1135. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., Ozono, H., Nakashima, S., Yoshikawa, S., & Watabe, M. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality & Psychology, 98, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0017673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426. doi:10.1037/a0031050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Colvin, C. R. (2003). Judging assertiveness. Facta Universitatis, 2, 731–744.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. D., Smith, S. T., & Christopher, J. C. (2007). What defines the good person? Cross-cultural comparisons of experts’ models with lay prototypes. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 38, 333–360.10.1177/0022022107300279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spain, J. S., Eaton, L. G., & Funder, D. C. (2001). Perspective on personality: The relative accuracy of self versus others for the prediction of emotion and behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 837–867. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueda, K. (2014). Negotiating multiple identities: Shame and pride among Japanese returnees. Retrieved from file: ///C:/Users/Win8/Downloads/9789812870070-c2.10.1007/978-981-287-008-7
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A. N., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 41–133). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme, S., Crombez, G., & Spence, C. (2009). Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli? Experimental Brain Research, 193, 197–204. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1608-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, L. J., & Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34, 403–419. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 277–283. doi:10.1038/nn816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232.10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B. (1997). Parallels between competence- versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245–256. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<245:AID-EJSP819>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person and self perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. doi:10.1080/10463280500229619
   Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., & Lee, H. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25, 306–338. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L. A., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 167–185. doi:10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar