Simulation-based production analysis of mixed-model assembly lines with uncertain processing times

References

• Alonso-Ayuso, A., Escudero, L. F., Ortuño, M. T., & Pizarro, C. (2007). On a stochastic sequencing and scheduling problem. Computers and Operations Research, 34(9), 2604–2624.10.1016/j.cor.2005.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh, A., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Hatami-Shirkouhi, L., & Ansarinejad, A. (2011). A unique fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: Computer simulation approach for productive operators’ assignment in cellular manufacturing systems with uncertainty and vagueness. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56(1–4), 329–343.10.1007/s00170-011-3186-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, J., Alfaro, R., & Batalla, C. (2015). Modeling and solving the mixed-model sequencing problem to improve productivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 83–95.10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, J., & Cano, A. (2011). Solving mixed model sequencing problem in assembly lines with serial workstations with work overload minimisation and interruption rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), 495–513.10.1016/j.ejor.2010.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, E. K., Muriel, A., & Biller, S. (2005). Managing flexible capacity in a make-to-order environment. Management Science, 51(2), 167–180.10.1287/mnsc.1040.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, N., Fliedner, M., & Scholl, A. (2009). Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: Survey, classification and model critique. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(2), 349–373.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucker, P., & Shakhlevich, N. V. (2011). Inverse scheduling: Two-machine flow-shop problem. Journal of Scheduling, 14(3), 239–256.10.1007/s10951-010-0168-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S. S., & Hunsucker, J. L. (2008). A sensitivity analysis tool for improving the capacity of amusement rides. Journal of Simulation, 2(2), 117–126.10.1057/jos.2008.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimov, I., & Georgieva, R. (2010). Adaptive Monte Carlo approach for sensitivity analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7644–7645.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.158
   Google Scholar
• Dimov, I., Georgieva, R., & Ostromsky, T. (2012). Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of an Eulerian large-scale air pollution model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 107, 23–28.10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emde, S., Boysen, N., & Scholl, A. (2010). Balancing mixed-model assembly lines: A computational evaluation of objectives to smoothen workload. International Journal of Production Research, 48(11), 3173–3191.10.1080/00207540902810577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezail, F., Pierreval, H., & Hajri-Gabouj, S. (2010). Analysis of robustness in proactive scheduling: A graphical approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2), 193–198.10.1016/j.cie.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezavati, V. R., & Saidi-Mehrabad, M. (2011). An efficient hybrid self-learning method for stochastic cellular manufacturing problem: A queuing-based analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1326–1335.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamboni, M., Monod, H., & Makowski, D. (2011). Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96, 450–459.10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian, K., Zhang, C., Gao, L., & Shao, X. (2012). A modified colonial competitive algorithm for the mixed-model U-line balancing and sequencing problem. International Journal of Production Research, 50(18), 5117–5131.10.1080/00207543.2011.653453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, F., & Mirabelli, G. (2009). Effective design of an assembly line using modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 3(1), 50–60.10.1057/jos.2008.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montevechi, J. A. B., de Almeida, Filho R. G., Paiva, A. P., Costa, R. F. S., & Medeiros, A. L. (2010). Sensitivity analysis in discrete-event simulation using fractional factorial designs. Journal of Simulation, 4(2), 128–142.10.1057/jos.2009.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossent, J., Elsen, P., & Bauwens, W. (2011). Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12), 1515–1525.10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovic, S., Fayad, C., & Petrovic, D. (2008). Sensitivity analysis of a fuzzy multiobjective scheduling problem. International Journal of Production Research, 46(12), 3327–3344.10.1080/00207540601042472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seleim, A., & ElMaraghy, H. (2014). Parametric analysis of mixed-model assembly lines using max-plus algebra. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 7(4), 305–314.10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Shao, X., Wang, B., Rao, Y., Gao, L., & Xu, C. (2010). Metaheuristic approaches to sequencing mixed-model fabrication/assembly systems with two objectives. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48(9–12), 1159–1171.10.1007/s00170-009-2337-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillekens, T., Koberstein, A., & Suhl, L. (2011). Aggregate production planning in the automotive industry with special consideration of workforce flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 49(17), 5055–5078.10.1080/00207543.2010.524261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M. (2001). Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55(1–3), 271–280.10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M., & Kucherenko, S. (2010). A new derivative based importance criterion for groups of variables and its link with the global sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 181(7), 1212–1217.10.1016/j.cpc.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamwong, W., & Achalakul, T. (2012). Yield improvement analysis with parameter-screening factorials. Applied Soft Computing, 12(3), 1021–1040.10.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar