Quantitative analysis of a conceptual system dynamics maintenance performance model using multi-objective optimisation

References

• Alabdulkarim, A. A., Ball, P. D., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Applications of simulation in maintenance research. World Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 9(1), 14–37.
   Google Scholar
• Alrabghi, A., & Tiwari, A. (2015). State of the art in simulation-based optimisation for maintenance systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82, 167–182.10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrabghi, A., & Tiwari, A. (2016). A novel approach for modelling complex maintenance systems using discrete event simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 154, 160–170.10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, T. (2013). Analysis of manufacturing supply chains using system dynamics and multi-objective optimization (PhD thesis). University of Skövde.
   Google Scholar
• Babbar, M., Lakshmikantha, A., & Goldberg, D. E. (2003). A modified NSGA-II to solve noisy multiobjective problems. In Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Chicago, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3), 183–210.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J. W. M., & Fransoo, J. C. (2002). Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(2), 241–264.10.1108/01443570210414338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida, A. T., Pires, F., Rodrigo, J., & Cavalcante, C. A. V. (2015). A review of the use of multicriteria and multi-objective models in maintenance and reliability. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 26(3), 249–271.10.1093/imaman/dpv010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K. (2014). Multi-objective optimization. In E. K. Burke & G. Kendall (Eds.), Search methodologies: Introductory tutorials in optimization and decision support techniques (pp. 403–449). US: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6940-7
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, R. (1996). Applications of maintenance optimization models: A review and analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 51(3), 229–240.10.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, S. H., & Kamaruddin, S. (2015). Maintenance policy optimization – literature review and directions. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(5–8), 1263–1283.10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudas, C., Hedenstierna, P., & Ng, A. H. C. (2011). Simulation-based innovization for manufacturing systems analysis using data mining and visual analytics. In Proceedings of 4th International Swedish Production Symposium, Lund, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, J. (2008). Using system dynamics and multiple objective optimization to support policy analysis for complex systems. In H. Qudrat-Ullah, J. M. Spector, & P. I. Davidsen (Eds.), Complex decision making: Theory and practice (pp. 59–81). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, M. C. (2015). Handbook of simulation optimization. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4939-1384-8
   Google Scholar
• Garg, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2006). Maintenance management: Literature review and directions. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 12(3), 205–238.10.1108/13552510610685075
   Google Scholar
• Günal, M. M., & Pidd, M. (2010). Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: A review of the literature. Journal of Simulation, 4(1), 42–51.10.1057/jos.2009.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenstierna, P. (2010). Applying multi-objective optimisation to dynamic supply chain models. Conradi Research Review, 6, 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgin, M., & Tunali, S. (2007). Joint optimization of spare parts inventory and maintenance policies using genetic algorithms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 34(5–6), 594–604.10.1007/s00170-006-0618-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, E. K., Oliva, R., Repenning, N. P., Rockart, S., & Sterman, J. (1999). Overcoming the improvement paradox. European Management Journal, 17(2), 120–134.10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00072-3
   Google Scholar
• Lad, B. K., & Kulkarni, M. S. (2011). Optimal maintenance schedule decisions for machine tools considering the user’s cost structure. International Journal of Production Research, 50(20), 5859–5871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledet, W., & Paich, M. (1994). The manufacturing game. Paper presented at the Proceedings from the Goal/QPC Conference Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Linnéusson, G. (2009). On system dynamics as an approach for manufacturing systems development. Materials and manufacturing technology (Licentiate thesis). Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Linnéusson, G., Ng, A. H. C., & Aslam, T. (2018). Towards strategic development of maintenance and its effects on production performance by using system dynamics in automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Andersen, D. L. (2003). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: Methods and models. System Dynamics Review, 19(4), 271–296.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morecroft, J. (2007). Strategic modelling and business dynamics: A feedback systems approach. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolai, R. P., & Dekker, R. (2008). Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: A review. In H. Pham (Ed.), Complex system maintenance handbook (pp. 263–286). London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7
   Google Scholar
• Pascual, R., Meruane, V., & Rey, P. A. (2008). On the effect of downtime costs and budget constraint on preventive and replacement policies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(1), 144–151.10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2001). Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Review, 43(4), 64–88.10.2307/41166101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, A., & Deleryd, M. (2011). Cost of poor maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 63–73.10.1108/13552511111116259
   Google Scholar
• Sasdad, R., McDonnel, G., Viana, J., Desai, S. M., Harper, P., & Brailsford, S. (2014). Hybrid modelling case studies. In S. Brailsford & B. Dangerfield (Eds.), Discrete-event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making (pp. 295–317). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Yadava, G. S., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2011). A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 5–25.10.1108/13552511111116222
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). FLM to select suitable maintenance strategy in process industries using MISO model. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 11(4), 359–374.10.1108/13552510510626981
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin, D. (2000). A review of overall models for maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 6(3), 138–164.10.1108/13552510010341171
   Google Scholar
• Simões, J. M., Gomes, C. F., & Yasin, M. M. (2011). A literature review of maintenance performance measurement. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(2), 116–137.10.1108/13552511111134565
   Google Scholar
• Sinkkonen, T., Marttonen, S., Tynninen, L., & Kärri, T. (2013). Modelling costs in maintenance networks. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 19(3), 330–344.10.1108/JQME-05-2013-0022
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. (1997). An empirical study of the relationship between production technology and maintenance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 53(2), 191–207.10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00113-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, A. H. C. (2000). Maintenance performance management in capital intensive organizations (PhD thesis). University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horenbeek, A., Buré, J., Cattrysse, D., Pintelon, L., & Vansteenwegen, P. (2013). Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(2), 499–508.10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horenbeek, A., Pintelon, L., & Muchiri, P. (2010). Maintenance optimization models and criteria. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1(3), 189–200.10.1007/s13198-011-0045-x
   Google Scholar
• Vorster, M. C., & De La Garza, J. M. (1990). Consequential equipment costs associated with lack of availability and downtime. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(4), 656–669.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(656)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2002). A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(3), 469–489.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (2005). Improving strategic management with the fundamental principles of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 21(4), 329–350.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wireman, T. (2004). Benchmarking best practices in maintenance management. New York, NY: Industrial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, J. (2001). Combining the best bits of RCM, RBI, TPM, TQM, Six-Sigma and other ‘solutions’. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://www.plant-maintenance.com/articles/Mixing_Maintenance_Methods.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, A., Qu, B. Y., Li, H., Zhao, S. Z., Suganthan, P. N., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 32–49.10.1016/j.swevo.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar