Installation planning for an offshore wind farm: a hybrid modelling framework of integrating simulation and optimisation with a Markov Chain

References

• Ait-Alla, A., Oelker, S., Lewandowski, M., & Freitag, M. (2020). Simulation of contrary maintenance strategies for offshore wind turbines. Journal of Simulation, 14(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2019.1675481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ait-Alla, A., Quandt, M., & Lütjen, M. (2013). Simulation-based aggregate installation planning of offshore wind farms. International Journal of Energy, 7(2), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Allal, A., Sahnoun, M., Adjoudj, R., Benslimane, S. M., & Mazar, M. (2021). Multi-agent based simulation-optimization of maintenance routing in offshore wind farms. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 157, 107342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrabghi, A., Tiwari, B., & Savill, M. (2017). Simulation-based optimization of maintenance systems: Industrial case studies. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 44, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armas, J. D., Juan, A. A., Marquès, J. M., & Pedroso, J. P. (2017). Solving the deterministic and stochastic uncapacitated facility location problem: From a heuristic to a simheuristic. Journal of Operational Research Society, 68(10), 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0155-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asim, T., Islam, S., Hemmati, A., & Khalid, M. (2022). A review of recent advancements in offshore wind turbine technology. Energies, 15, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis, A. N., Chan, W., Gendreau, M., L’Ecuyer, P., & Pisacane, O. (2010). Optimizing daily agent scheduling in a multiskill call center. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(3), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, K. -H., Mustafee, N., Lazarova-Molnar, S., & Zheng, L. (2022). Hybrid modeling of collaborative freight transportation planning using agent-based simulation, auction-based mechanisms, and optimization. Simulation, 98(9), 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497221075614
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, C., & Azevedo, A. (2019). Assessing the impact of performance determinants in complex MTO/ETO supply chains through an extended hybrid modelling approach. International Journal of Production Research, 57(11), 3577–3597. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1543970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, E., Ozturk, D. T., Revie, M., Akartunalıa, K., Day, A. H., & Boulougouris, E. (2018). A mixed-method optimisation and simulation framework for supporting logistical decisions during offshore wind farm installations. European Journal of Operational Research, 264, 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinke, T., Ait-Alla, A., & Freitag, M. (2017). Resource sharing in the logistics of the offshore wind farm installation process based on a simulation study. International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 7(6), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2017.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Brailsford, S. C., Eldabi, T., Kunc, M., Mustafee, N., & Osorio, A. F. (2019). Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review. European Journal of Operational Research, 278(3), 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiadamrong, N., & Piyathanavong, V. (2017). Optimal design of supply chain network under uncertainty environment using hybrid analytical and simulation modeling approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 13, 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-017-0201-2
   Google Scholar
• CleanTechnica. (2018). Hywind Scotland, World’s First Floating Wind Farm, Performing Better Than Expected. https://www.cleantechnica.com
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, A., Baker, E., Liesiö, J., & Salo, A. (2018). A portfolio model for siting offshore wind farms with economic and environmental objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, C. S., Fowler, J. W., Kotiadis, K., Monks, T., Onggo, B. S., Robertson, D. A., & Tako, A. A. (2020). How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19. Journal of Simulation, 14(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2020.1751570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keizer, M., Haijema, R., Bloemhof, J. M., & Van Der Vorst, J. G. (2015). Hybrid optimization and simulation to design a logistics network for distributing perishable products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy News Network. (2022). Turbine-installing ship is Dominion’s big bet on offshore wind. https://energynews.us/2022/03/08/giant-turbine-installing-ship-is-dominion-energys-500m-bet-on-u-s-offshore-wind
   Google Scholar
• Fischetti, M. (2021). On the optimized design of next-generation wind farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Alcoba, A., Hendrix, E. M. T., Ortega, G., Halvorsen-Weare, E. E., & Haugland, D. (2019). On offshore wind farm maintenance scheduling for decision support on vessel fleet composition. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnenthal, J., & Clauss, G. (2010). Robust pareto-optimum routing of ships utilising deterministic and ensemble weather forecasts. Ships and Offshore Structures, 5(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445300903210988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irawan, C. A., Wall, G., & Jones, D. (2017). Bi-objective optimisation model for installation scheduling in offshore wind farms. Computers & Operations Research, 78, 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan, A. A., Grasman, S. E., Caceres-Cruz, J., & Bektas, T. (2014). A simheuristic algorithm for the single-period stochastic inventory-routing problem with stockouts. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 46, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldellis, J. K., Apostolou, D., Kapsali, M., & Kondili, E. (2016). Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy: Comparison with onshore counterpart. Renewable Energy, 92, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkhove, L. -P., & Vanhoucke, M. (2017). Optimised scheduling for weather sensitive offshore construction projects. Omega, 66(Part A), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.01.011
   Google Scholar
• KMA. (2022). Korea meteorological administration national climate data center. Retrieved Jan 20, 2022, from https://data.kma.go.kr/resources/html/en/aowdp.html
   Google Scholar
• Lange, K., Rinne, A., & Haasis, H. D. (2012). Planning Maritime Logistics Concepts for Offshore Wind Farms: A Newly Developed Decision Support System. In H., Hu, X., Shi, Stahlbock, R, Voß, S. (Eds,). Computational Logistics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 142–158. pp. 7555. Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. -S., Kim, J. -H., & Yoo, S. -H. (2021). Would people pay a price premium for electricity from domestic wind power facilities? The case of South Korea. Energy Policy, 156, 112455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. T., & Chen, C. M. (2015). Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 51, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, B., & Krogsgaard, P. (2010). Offshore wind power 2010. BTM Consult, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, S. (2011). Selection, design and construction of offshore wind turbine foundations. In I. Al-Bahadly (Ed.), Wind turbines (pp. 231–264). IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, R., & Cotes, G. (2015). A simulation model to enable the optimization of ambulance fleet allocation and base station location for increased patient survival. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhabie, Y. T., Caprace, J. D., Petcu, C., & Rigo, P. (2015). Improving the installation of offshore wind farms by the use of discrete event simulation. Proceedings of 5thWorld Maritime Technology Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafee, N., Harper, A., & Onggo, B. S. (2020). Hybrid modelling and simulation (M&S): Driving innovation in the theory and practice of M&S. In Proceedings of the 2020 Winter Simulation Conference, 3140–3151. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafee, N., & Powell, J. H. (2018). From hybrid simulation to hybrid systems modelling. In Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1430–1439. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt, M., Beinke, T., Ait Alla, A., & Freitag, M. (2017). Simulation based investigation of the impact of information sharing on the offshore wind farm installation process. Journal of Renewable Energy, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8301316
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, R. C., Desmond, C., Judge, F., Serraris, J. -J., & Murphy, J. (2022). Floating wind turbines: Marine operations challenges and opportunities. Wind Energy Science, 7, 903–924. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-903-2022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. (2020). Japan plans to install up to 45 GW of offshore wind power by 2040. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-windpower-idUSKBN28P0C6
   Google Scholar
• Rippel, D., Jathe, N., Lutjen, M., & Freitag, M. (2019). Evaluation of loading bay restrictions for the installation of offshore wind farms using a combination of mixed-integer linear programming and model predictive control. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235030
   Google Scholar
• Riviera. (2021). Samsung Heavy Industries secures AIPs for environmentally friendly turbine installation vessel. https://www.rivieramm.com/news-content-hub/samsung-heavy-secures-aips-for-environmentally-friendly-turbine-installation-vessel-64882
   Google Scholar
• Rytwinski, A., & Crowe, K. A. (2010). A simulation-optimization model for selecting the location of fuel-breaks to minimize expected losses from forest fires. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.013
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, M. -S., Kim, S. -R., Cho, D. -H., & Kang, J. -G. (2022). Innovative single-day installation vessel for offshore wind turbines. Energies, 15, 3914. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15113914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saif, A., & Elhedhli, S. (2016). Cold supply chain design with environmental considerations: A simulation-optimization approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(1), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi, F., Mahootchi, M., & Husseini, S. (2019). Developing a robust stochastic model for designing a blood supply chain network in a crisis: A possible earthquake in Tehran. Annals of Operations Research, 283(05), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2533-0
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, B., & Faiz, T. (2017). Minimizing transportation and installation costs for turbines in offshore wind farms. Renewable Energy, 101, 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., Yadava, G., & Deshmukh, S. (2011). A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552511111116222
   Google Scholar
• Stålhane, M., Halvorsen-Weare, E. E., Nonås, L. M., & Pantuso, G. (2019). Optimizing vessel fleet size and mix to support maintenance operations at offshore wind farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Jeon, J. (2018). Probabilistic forecasting of wave height for offshore wind turbine maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(3), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolk, A., Harper, A., & Mustafee, N. (2021). Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursavas, E. (2017). A benders decomposition approach for solving the offshore wind farm installation planning at the North Sea. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2022a). Offshore wind market report: 2022 Edition. Technical Report. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/offshore_wind_market_report_2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy. (2022b). Supply chain road map for offshore wind energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://www.nrel.gov/wind/offshore-supply-chain-road-map.html
   Google Scholar
• Uzunoglu, E., Karmakar, D., & Soares, C. (2016). Floating offshore wind platforms. In L. Castro-Santos & V. Diaz-Casas (Eds.), Floating offshore wind farms (pp. 53–76). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vis, I. F., & Ursavas, E. (2016). Assessment approaches to logistics for offshore wind energy installation. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 14, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind Energy Technologies Office. (2022). Next-generation wind technology. https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/next-generation-wind-technology
   Google Scholar
• WindEurope. (2020). Offshore wind in Europe - key trends and statistics 2020. Technical Report. https://windeurope.org/intelligence-platform/product/offshore-wind-in-europe-key-trends-and-statistics-2020
   Google Scholar
• WindEurope. (2022). Offshore wind energy 2022 mid-year statistics. Technical Report. https://windeurope.org/intelligence-platform/statistics
   Google Scholar
• World Forum Offshore Wind. (2021). Global offshore wind report. Technical Report. https://wfo-global.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/WFO_Global-Offshore-Wind-Report-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xia, G., Draxl, C., Optis, M., & Redfern, S. (2022). Detecting and characterizing simulated sea breezes over the US northeastern coast with implications for offshore wind energy. Wind Energy Science, 7, 815–829. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-815-2022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar