Dominant factors in the simulation-based development of warehousing services

References

• Abdi, H. (2006). Bonferroni and Sidak corrections for multiple comparisons. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 3(1), 103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Altarazi, S. A., & Ammouri, M. M. (2018). Concurrent manual-order-picking warehouse design: A simulation-based design of experiments approach. International Journal of Production Research, 56(23), 7103–7121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1421780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami, B., Aghezzaf, E.-H., & Limere, V. (2017). Using simulation to analyze picker blocking in manual order picking systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1798–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.317
   Google Scholar
• Bučková, M., Krajčovič, M., & Plinta, D. (2018, August). Use of dynamic simulation in warehouse designing. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance (pp. 485–498). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cioppa, T. M., & Lucas, T. W. (2007). Efficient nearly orthogonal and space-filling Latin hypercubes. Technometrics, 49(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017006000000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. saGe Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goetschalckx, M., McGinnis, L., Sharp, G., Bodner, D., Govindaraj, T., & Huang, K. (2002). Development of a design methodology for warehousing systems: Hierarchical framework. In IIE Annual Conference Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J., Goetschalckx, M., & McGinnis, L. (2007). Research on warehouse operation: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, J., Goetschalckx, M., & McGinnis, L. (2010). Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, D., Kirberg, M., Kuhnt, S., & Clausen, U. (2022). Metamodel-based optimization of shift planning in high-bay warehouse operations. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 39(2), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., Sánchez, S. M., Lucas, T. W., & Cioppa, T. M. (2005). State-of-the- art review: A user’s guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 17(3), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, R., Le-Duc, T., & Roodbergen, K. J. (2007). Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, T. W., Kelton, W. D., Sánchez, P. J., Sánchez, S. M., & Anderson, B. L. (2015). Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 62(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, M. (2012). Warehouse/Dc operations survey: Mixed signals Logistics management . 51(11).
   Google Scholar
• Powers, M. J., Sánchez, S. M., & Lucas, T. W. (2012). The exponential expansion of simulation in research. In C. Laroque, J. Himmelspach, R. Pasupathy, O. Rose, & A. M. Uhrmacher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 winter simulation conference (pp. 1–12). Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roodbergen, K. J., & Koster, R. (2001). Routing methods for warehouses with multiple cross aisles. International Journal of Production Research, 39(9), 1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110028128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouwenhorst, B., Reuter, B., Stockrahm, V., van Houtum, G. J., Mantel, R. J., & Zijm, W. H. M. (2000). Warehouse design and control: Framework and literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(3), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00020-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, S. M., Sánchez, P. J., & Wan, H. (2018). Work smarter, not harder: A tutorial on designing and conducting simulation experiments. In 2018 winter simulation conference (wsc) (pp. 237–251). Göteborg, Sweden: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sarnow, T., & Elbert, R. (2022). V&V application in generic simulation models in logistics. Journal of Simulation, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2022.2096509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, N. (2013). Leitfaden Kontraktlogistik-Ausschreibung: Handlungsempfehlungen und Checklisten für Industrie, Handel und Dienstleister. DVV Media Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shetty, N., Sah, B., & Chung, S. H. (2020). Route optimization for warehouse order picking operations via vehicle routing and simulation. SN Applied Sciences, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2076-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt, F. H., Alpan, G., DiMascolo, M., & Rodriguez, C. M. T. (2015). Warehouse performance measurement: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(18), 5524–5544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Gaast, J. P., & Weidinger, F. (2022). A deep learning approach for the selection of an order picking system. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(2), 530–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geest, M., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021a). Design of a reference architecture for developing smart warehouses in industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 124(103343), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103343
   Google Scholar
• van Geest, M., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021b). SmartWarehouses: Rationale, challenges and solution directions. Applied Sciences, 12(219), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010219
   Google Scholar
• van Gils, T., Ramaekers, K., Braekers, K., Depaire, B., & Caris, A. (2018). Increasing order picking efficiency by integrating storage, batching, zone picking, and routing policy decisions. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gils, T., Ramaekers, K., Caris, A., & de Koster, R. (2018). Designing efficient order picking systems by combining planning problems: State-of-the-art classification and review. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, H., Sánchez, S. M., Kienitz, K. H., & Belderrain, M. C. N. (2013). Efficient, nearly orthogonal-and-balanced, mixed designs: An effective way to conduct trade-off analyses via simulation. Journal of Simulation, 7(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2013.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yener, F., & Yazgan, H. R. (2019). Optimal warehouse design: Literature review and case study application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, M., & de Koster, R. B. M. (2009). The impact of order batching and picking area zoning on order picking system performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(2), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Guo, Z., Zhang, W., Cai, H., Wang, C., Yu, Y., Li, W., & Wang, J. (2019). Layout design for intelligent warehouse by evolution with fitness approximation. IEEE Access - Special Section on Data Mining for Internet of Things, 7, 166310–166317. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953486
   Google Scholar