Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management

References

• Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, M., Viavattene, C., Faulkner, H., & Priest, S. (2013). Translating the complexities of flood risk science using KEEPER – a knowledge exchange exploratory tool for professionals in emergency response. Journal of Flood Risk Management, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12042
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 777–798. doi:10.1177/0309132510362600
   Google Scholar
• Bass, W. M., & Denise Blanchard, R. (2011). Examining geographic visualization as a technique for individual risk assessment. Applied Geography, 31, 53–63. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H., & Tobin, G. (2007). Efficient and effective? The 100-year flood in the communication and perception of flood risk. Environmental Hazards, 7, 302–311. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2005). In parliament with things. In L. Tønder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 133–48). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P., & Pidgeon, N. (2008). Constructing responsibilities for risk: Negotiating citizen – state relationships. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1312–30. doi:10.1068/a39150
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., Anselin, L., & Farris, J. (2008). Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1128, 29–40. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.005
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., & Whatmore, S. J. (2010). The stuff of politics: An introduction. In B. Braun & S. J. Whatmore (Eds.), Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life (pp. ix–xl). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruen, M., Krahe, P., Zappa, M., Olsson, J., Vehvilainen, B., Kok, K., & Daamen, K. (2010). Visualizing flood forecasting uncertainty: Some current European EPS platforms-COST731 working group 3. Atmospheric Science Letters, 11, 92–99. doi:10.1002/asl.258
   Google Scholar
• Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32, 1481–1495. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
   Google Scholar
• Buchecker, M., Meier, C., & Hunziker, M. (2010). Measuring the effects of consensus-building processes with methods of intervention research. European Planning Studies, 18, 259–280. doi:10.1080/09654310903491580
   Google Scholar
• Buchecker, M., Menzel, S., & Home, R. (2013). How much does participatory flood management contribute to stakeholders’ social capacity building? Empirical findings based on a triangulation of three evaluation approaches. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13, 1427–1444. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1427-2013
   Google Scholar
• Buizza, R. (2008). The value of probabilistic prediction. Atmospheric Science Letters, 9, 36–42. doi:10.1002/asl.170
   Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., Fielding, J., & Thrush, D. (2008). ‘It'll never happen to me’: Understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters, 32, 216–238.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2011). From ‘flood defence’ to ‘flood risk management’: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 533–547. doi:10.1068/c09181j
   Google Scholar
• Cadag, J. R. D., & Gaillard, J. (2012). Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction: The contribution of participatory mapping. Area, 44, 100–109. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01065.x
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. J., Beffa, C., & Painter, D. J. (1998). Comparison of observations by flood plain residents with results from a two-dimensional flood plain model : Waihao River, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology. (New Zealand), 37, 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. R., Kesby, M., Fazey, I., & Spray, C. (2013). The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference. Social Studies of Science, 43, 754–779. doi:10.1177/0306312713478670
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Systems Research, 2, 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D. (2009). From externality to inputs and interference: Framing environmental research in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 3–11. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00333.x
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D. (2012). The perception and use of public weather services by emergency and resiliency professionals in the UK. Report for the Met Office Public Weather Service Customer Group. 2 March. King's College: London.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D., & Dyer, S. (2002). Dialogue, metaphors of dialogue and understandings of geography. Area, 34, 229–241. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00077
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D., & Nobert, S. (2011). Responding to early flood warning in the European Union. In C. O. Meyer & C. de Franco (Eds.), Forecasting, warning, and transnational risks: Is prevention possible? (pp. 127–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D., Nobert, S., Cloke, H., & Pappenberger, F. (2010). Challenges in communicating and using ensembles in operational flood forecasting. Meteorological Applications, 17, 209–222. doi:10.1002/met.194
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, D., Nobert, S., Cloke, H. L., & Pappenberger, F. (2013). The European flood alert system and the communication, perception, and use of ensemble predictions for operational flood risk management. Hydrological Processes, 27, 147–157. doi:10.1002/hyp.9419
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, A., Lane, S., Ward, N., & Whatmore, S. (2013). Overflowing with issues: Following the political trajectories of flooding. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 603–618. doi:10.1068/c11230
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, M. P., & Demeritt, D. (2012). Flooding and the framing of risk in British broadsheets, 1985–2010. Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662512457613
   Google Scholar
• EU Water Directors. (2003). Best practice on flood prevention, protection, and mitigation. Brussels: Water Directors of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EXCIMAP. (2007). Handbook on good practices for flood mapping in Europe. Ispra: European European Exchange Circle on Flood Mapping, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science Technology Human Values, 15i, 226–243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15, 137–145. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00308.x
   Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., Flex, F., Scheibel, M., Stickler, T., Sereinig, N., … Firus, K. (2012). Improving the active involvement of stakeholders and the public in flood risk management: tools of an involvement strategy and case study results from Austria, Germany and Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 12, 2785–2798. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-2785-2012
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordonz, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S., Spachinger, K., Dorner, W., Rochman, J., & Serrhini, K. (2009). Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping. Environmental Hazards, 8, 52–70. doi:10.3763/ehaz.2009.0007
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). ‘A 30% chance of rain tomorrow’: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25, 623–629. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00608.x
   Google Scholar
• Grothmann, T., & Reusswig, F. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38, 101–120. doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Handmer, J., & Proudley, B. (2007). Communicating uncertainty via probabilities: The case of weather forecasts. Environmental Hazards, 7, 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Harries, T. (2012). The anticipated emotional consequences of adaptive behaviour – Impacts on the take-up of household flood-protection measures. Environment and Planning A, 44, 649–668. doi:10.1068/a43612
   Google Scholar
• Harvatt, J., Petts, J., & Chilvers, J. (2011). Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: Flooding and sea-level rise comparisons. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 63–83. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.503935
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Sarre, S., Simmons, P., & Smith, N. (2008). Risk, framing and everyday life: Epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health, Risk & Society, 10, 421–438. doi:10.1080/13698570802381451
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, W. E., Norman, S. A., & Brody, S. D. (2013). Examining the 100-year floodplain as a metric of risk, loss, and household adjustment. Risk Analysis, 33, 186–191. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01840.x
   Google Scholar
• Howgate, O. R., & Kenyon, W. (2009). Community cooperation with natural flood management: A case study in the Scottish Borders. Area, 41, 329–340. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00869.x
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M., & Rothstein, H. (2013). The risk organisation: Or how organisations reconcile themselves to failure. Journal of Risk Research, 16, 651–675. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.761276
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L., & Priest, S. J. (2008). Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. S. (2008). Public participation and perceptions of watershed modeling. Society & Natural Resources, 22, 79–87. doi:10.1080/08941920802220347
   Google Scholar
• Joslyn, S. L., Nadav-Greenberg, L., Taing, M. U., & Nichols, R. M. (2009). The effects of wording on the understanding and use of uncertainty information in a threshold forecasting decision. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 55–72. doi:10.1002/acp.1449
   Google Scholar
• Joslyn, S. L., & Nichols, R. M. (2009). Probability or frequency? Expressing forecast uncertainty in public weather forecasts. Meteorological Applications, 16, 309–314. doi:10.1002/met.121
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
   Google Scholar
• Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33, 24–49. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
   Google Scholar
• Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W., & De Maeyer, P. (2011). An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian coast. Risk Analysis, 31, 1055–1068. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, K. (2013). The limits and variety of risk-based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England. Regulation & Governance, 7, 236–257. doi:10.1111/rego.12009
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C., & Demeritt, D. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and the institutional geographies of adaptation to future flooding in England. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, M., Grêt-Regamey, A., & Hurni, L. (2011). Visualization of uncertainty in natural hazards assessments using an interactive cartographic information system. Natural Hazards, 59, 1735–1751. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9864-y
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. J., Ward, N., & Bradley, S. (2011). Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 15–36. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x
   Google Scholar
• Lang, S., Fewtrell, L., & Bartram, J. (2001). Risk communication. In L. Fewtrell & J. Bartram (Eds.), Water quality: Guidelines, standards and health (pp. 317–332). London: IWA publishing for the World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. (1996). Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 85–94. doi:10.1177/0002716296545001009
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R. E., & 6, P. (2008). What environmental and technological risk communication research and health risk research can learn from each other. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 141–167. doi:10.1080/13669870701797137
   Google Scholar
• Martini, F., & De Roo, A. (2007). EXCIFF guide: Good practice for delivering flood-related information to the general public (No. EUR 22760). Ispra: Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen, L., & Jones, O. (2012). Building local/lay flood knowledges into community flood resilience planning after the July 2007 floods, Gloucestershire, UK. Hydrology Research, 43, 675. doi:10.2166/nh.2012.022
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J., & Runhaar, H. A. C. (2013). Legitimate adaptive flood risk governance beyond the dikes: The cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam. Regional Environmental Change, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0527-2
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., Kuhlicke, C., Luther, J., Fuchs, S., Priest, S., Dorner, W., … Scheuer, S. (2012). Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 1701–1716. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
   Google Scholar
• Millington, J. D. A., Demeritt, D., & Romero-Calcerrada, R. (2011). Participatory evaluation of agent-based land-use models. Journal of Land Use Science, 6, 195–210. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2011.558595
   Google Scholar
• Morss, R. E., Lazo, J. K., & Demuth, J. L. (2010). Examining the use of weather forecasts in decision scenarios: Results from a US survey with implications for uncertainty communication. Meteorological Applications, 17, 149–162. doi:10.1002/met.196
   Google Scholar
• Neuvel, J. M. M., & van den Brink, A. (2009). Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52, 865–880. doi:10.1080/09640560903180909
   Google Scholar
• Nobert, S., Demeritt, D., & Cloke, H. (2010). Informing operational flood management with ensemble predictions: Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3, 72–79. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01056.x
   Google Scholar
• NRC. (2000). Risk analysis and uncertainty in flood damage reduction studies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P. (2008). Governmentality and risk. In J.O. Zinn (Ed.), Social theories of risk and uncertainty (pp. 52–75). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, J. J., Bradford, R. A., Bonaiuto, M., De Dominicis, S., Rotko, P., Aaltonen, J., … Langan, S. J. (2012). Enhancing flood resilience through improved risk communications. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 2271–2282. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-2271-2012
   Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., Stephens, E., Thielen, J., Salamon, P., Demeritt, D., van Andel, S. J., … Alfieri, L. (2013). Visualizing probabilistic flood forecast information: Expert preferences and perceptions of best practice in uncertainty communication. Hydrological Processes, 27, 132–146. doi:10.1002/hyp.9253
   Google Scholar
• Pardoe, J., Penning-Rowsell, E., & Tunstall, S. (2011). Floodplain conflicts: Regulation and negotiation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 11, 2889–2902. doi:10.5194/nhess-11-2889-2011
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. J., Priest, S. J., & Tapsell, S. M. (2009). Understanding and enhancing the public's behavioural response to flood warning information. Meteorological Applications, 16, 103–114. doi:10.1002/met.119
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, B. L., Cloke, H. L., Pappenberger, F., Neal, J., & Demeritt, D. (2013). Reducing inconsistencies in point observations of maximum flood inundation level. Earth Interactions, 17, 1–27. doi:10.1175/2012EI000475.1
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, G. (2010). The September 2008 Morpeth flood: Information gathering For dynamic flood reconstruction. Newcastle: School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Newcastle University.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J., & Demeritt, D. (2012). Flood-risk management, mapping, and planning: The institutional politics of decision support in England. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2359–2378. doi:10.1068/a44660
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, H., Hewett, C. J. M., Morris, J., & Quinn, P. F. (2008). Agricultural land use and flood risk management: Engaging with stakeholders in North Yorkshire. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 787–798. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Ritzema, H., Froebrich, J., Raju, R., Sreenivas, C., & Kselik, R. (2010). Using participatory modelling to compensate for data scarcity in environmental planning: A case study from India. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 1450–1458. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., O'Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
   Google Scholar
• Roth, D., & Warner, J. (2007). Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: The case of ‘calamity polders’. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98, 519–525.
   Google Scholar
• Roulston, M. S., & Kaplan, T. R. (2009). A laboratory-based study of understanding of uncertainty in 5-day site-specific temperature forecasts. Meteorological Applications, 16, 237–244. doi:10.1002/met.113
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). A mathematical model of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273–1285. doi:10.1068/a42282
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2008). Natural Hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: People cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Analysis, 28, 771–778. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Soane, E., Schubert, I., Challenor, P., Lunn, R., Narendran, S., & Pollard, S. (2010). Flood perception and mitigation: the role of severity, agency, and experience in the purchase of flood protection, and the communication of flood information. Environment and Planning A, 42, 3023–3038. doi:10.1068/a43238
   Google Scholar
• Speller, G., & Twigger-Ross, C. (2005). Improving community and citizen engagement in flood risk management decision making, delivery and flood response. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I. (2011). Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science, 333, 1393–1400. doi:10.1126/science.1191181
   Google Scholar
• Stefanska, J., Magnuszewski, P., Sendzimir, J., Romaniuk, P., Taillieu, T., Dubel, A., … Balogh, P. (2011). A gaming exercise to explore problem-solving versus relational activities for river floodplain management. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 454–471. doi:10.1002/eet.586
   Google Scholar
• Steinführer, A., Kuhlicke, C., de Marchi, B., Scolobig, A., Tapsell, S., & Tunstall, S. (2009). Recommendations for flood risk management with communities at risk [Internet]. FLOODsite Report (Report No. T11-07-14). Retrieved from http://www.floodsite.net/html/partner_area/project_docs/FLOODsite_Broschuere_7-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, E. M., Edwards, T. L., & Demeritt, D. (2012). Communicating probabilistic information from climate model ensembles-lessons from numerical weather prediction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 409–426. doi:10.1002/wcc.187
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, P., Thompson, P., & Green, C. (2008). Can England learn lessons from Bangladesh in introducing participatory floodplain management? Water Resources Management, 22, 357–376. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9166-z
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: Affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31, 1658–1675. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, P., Shaw, R., Chantry, G., & Norton, J. (2009). GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: A case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam. Disasters, 33, 152–169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01067.x
   Google Scholar
• Tsouvalis, J., & Waterton, C. (2012). Building ‘participation’ upon critique: The Loweswater care project, Cumbria, UK. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 111–121. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.01.018
   Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, J., Martini, F., Loat, R., Slomp, R., & Passchier, R. (2009). Flood risk mapping in Europe, experiences and best practices. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2, 285–292. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01045.x
   Google Scholar
• Vari, A. (2002). Public involvement in flood risk management in Hungary. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 211–224. doi:10.1080/13669870110042606
   Google Scholar
• Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Lobo, G. (2006). Public and stakeholder participation in European water policy: A critical review of project evaluation processes. European Environment, 16, 19–31. doi:10.1002/eet.401
   Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W. F., & De Vries, N. N. K. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis, 29, 267–287. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
   Google Scholar
• Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox – Implications for governance and communication of natural Hazards. Risk Analysis, 33, 1049–1065. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, K. (2007). Mental models of flash floods and landslides. Risk Analysis, 27, 671–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00916.x
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, J. K. (2008). The constitution of risk communication in advanced liberal societies. Risk Analysis, 28, 1619–1637. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01108.x
   Google Scholar
• White, I., Kingston, R., & Barker, A. (2010). Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3, 337–346. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01083.x
   Google Scholar
• Zaalberg, R., & Midden, C. J. H. (2013). Living behind dikes: Mimicking flooding experiences. Risk Analysis, 33, 866–876. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01868.x
   Google Scholar