Watching the disaster unfold: geographies of engagement with live-streamed extreme weather

References

• Alexander, D. E. (2014). Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, S. (2013). Citizen witnessing: Revisioning journalism in times of crisis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andén-Papadopoulos, K. (2014). Citizen camera-witnessing: Embodied political dissent in the age of ‘mediated mass self-communication.’. New Media & Society, 16(5), 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813489863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, D., Ling, M., & Haynes, K. (2012). Flooding Facebook: The use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, L., Alaka, L., Hagen, A., Delgado, S., & Beven, J. (2023). Hurricane Ian. National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092022_Ian.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C., Ong, J., & Legara, E. (2016). Tweeting Supertyphoon Haiyan: Evolving functions of Twitter during and after a disaster event. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., Benckendorff, P., & Wang, J. (2019). Blended tourism experiencescape: A conceptualisation of live-streaming tourism. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019: Proceedings of the International Conference in Nicosia, Cyprus, January 30–February 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, S. (2018). Spaces of post-disaster experimentation: Agile entrepreneurship and geological agency in emerging disaster countercartographies. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618812023
   Google Scholar
• Dillane, T. (2023, June 17). Father of Auckland flood victim Daniel Mark Miller watched moments before son’s death on livestream. New Zealand Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/father-of-auckland-flood-victim-daniel-mark-miller-watched-moments-before-sons-death-on-livestream-it-hasnt-got-any-easier/WV6XP6SHQREIBFSRXEVGCARM34/
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, R., Lloyd, K., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2018). Qualitative methods III. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517730941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2008). Mundane hauntings: commuting through the phantasmagoric working-class spaces of Manchester, England. Cultural Geographies, 15(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008091330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K. (2022). The social movement was live streamed: A relational analysis of mobile live streaming during the 2019 Hong Kong protests. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(1), https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K., & Cheng, C. Y. (2022). Social media live streaming as affective news in the anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong. Chinese Journal of Communication, 15(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2083202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., & Treré, E. (2014). Challenging mainstream media, documenting real life and sharing with the community: An analysis of the motivations for producing citizen journalism in a post-disaster city. Global Media and Communication, 10(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513513192
   Google Scholar
• Fichet, E.S., Robinson, J.J., Dailey, D., & Starbor, K. (2016). Eyes on the ground: Emerging practices in periscope use during crisis events. International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. http://faculty.washington.edu/kstarbi/ISCRAM2016_Periscope_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frers, L. (2013). The matter of absence. Cultural Geographies, 20(4), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013477775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimson, O., & Tang, J. (2017). What makes live events engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025642
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., & Cumiskey, K. M. (2018). Mobiles facing death: Affective witnessing and the intimate companionship of devices. Cultural Studies Review, 24(2), 166–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Perreault, M. F., Park, E. H., Goldstein Hode, M., Halliwell, M. R., Turner McGowen, S. E., Davis, R., Vaid, S., McElderry, J. A., & Griffith, S. A. (2015). Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N. P., Fuller, P. B., Santia, M., & Saha, P. (2022). Representation and aggression in digital racial conflict: Analyzing public comments during live-streamed news of racial justice protests. Perspectives on Politics, 20(4), 1226–1245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami, A., Shah, V., Vaezi, R., & Bansal, A. (2020). Twitter speaks: A case of national disaster situational awareness. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519828620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakidou, M. (2015). Media witnessing: Exploring the audience of distant suffering. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714557981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisle, D. (2004). Gazing at ground zero: Tourism, voyeurism and spectacle. Journal for Cultural Research, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758042000797015
   Google Scholar
• Lovari, A., & Bowen, S. A. (2020). Social media in disaster communication: A case study of strategies, barriers, and ethical implications. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, M., Hsu, T. W., Park, J. S., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Emotional amplification during live-streaming: evidence from comments during and after news events. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392853
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, L., Tsonevsky, I., & Prates, F. (2017). Predictions of tropical cyclones Harvey and Irma. ECMWF Newsletter. https://www.ecmwf.int/en/newsletter/153/news/predictions-tropical-cyclones-harvey-and-irma.
   Google Scholar
• Mahanta, U., & Bharadwaj, G. (2022). Shifting boundaries of ‘perceived’ legitimacy. Performance Research, 27(3–4), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2022.2155420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, L., Cole, P. D., & Stewart, I. (2016). Using video games for volcanic hazard education and communication: an assessment of the method and preliminary results. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(7), 1673–1689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, M. (2018a). On the user’s side: YouTube and distant witnessing in the age of technology-enhanced mediability. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, M. (2018b). Online distant witnessing and live-streaming activism: Emerging differences in the activation of networked publics. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4035–4055. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818766703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S. (2019). Remembering and forgetting 1974: The 2011 Brisbane floods and memories of an earlier disaster. Geographical Research, 57(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcphillips, L. E., Chang, H., Chester, M. V., Depietri, Y., Friedman, E., Grimm, N. B., Kominoski, J. S., Mcphearson, T., Méndez-Lázaro, P., Rosi, E. J., Shiva, Shafiei. (2018). Defining extreme events: A cross-disciplinary review. Earth's Future, 6, 441–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Met Office. (2022). Storms Dudley, Eunice and Franklin, February 2022. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/binaries/content/assets/metofficegovuk/pdf/weather/learn-about/uk-pastevents/ interesting/2022/2022_01_storms_dudley_eunice_franklin_r1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, M. (2015). Connective witnessing: Reconfiguring the relationship between the individual and the collective. Information, Communication & Society, 18(11), 1393–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammed, S., & Mathew, S. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: A review of research in social media. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 13(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palutikof, J., Agnew, M., & Hoar, M. (2004). Public perceptions of unusually warm weather in the UK: Impacts, responses and adaptations. Climate Research, 26, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr026043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2020). Risk communication: Insights and requirements for designing successful communication programs on health and environmental hazards. In Handbook of risk and crisis communication (pp. 80–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. S., & Culshaw, M. G. (2003). Communicating the risks arising from geohazards. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 166(2), 261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Saka, E. (2017). The role of social media-based citizen journalism practices in the formation of contemporary protest movements. In Barrie Axford, Didem Buhari-Gulmez, & Seckin Baris Gulmez (Eds.), Rethinking ideology in the age of global discontent (pp. 48–66). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simandan, D. (2020). Being surprised and surprising ourselves: a geography of personal and social change. Progress in Human Geography, 44(1), 99–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2017). Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick, J. (2019). Experiencing fire: a phenomenological study of YouTube videos of the 2016 Fort McMurray fire. Natural Hazards, 98(1), 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03604-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, B., Tandoc, E. C., & Carmichael, C. (2015). Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Vis, F. (2012). Commenting on YouTube videos: From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorburn, E. D. (2014). Social media, subjectivity, and surveillance: moving on from occupy, the rise of live streaming video. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2013.827356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieweg, S., Hughes, A., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to situational awareness. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1079–1088.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, R. A., Adamson, G. C. D., & Kelman, I. (2020). Helices of disaster memory: How forgetting and remembering influence tropical cyclone response in Mauritius. International Journal of Risk Reduction, 50, 101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Zhuang, J. (2018). Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disasters. Natural Hazards, 93(3), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3344-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C. E., Kuligowski, E. D., & Pradhan, A. (2020). A review of social media use during disaster response and recovery phases. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2086
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, K., Ostermann, F. O., & Purves, R. S. (2017). Geographic variability of Twitter usage characteristics during disaster events. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 20(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2017.1371903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G. (2019). Zhibo: An ethnography of ordinary, boring, and vulgar livestreams. RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. (2022). Behind the scenes: exploring context and audience engagement behaviors in YouTube vlogs. In International conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 227–244). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., & Li, J. (2022). Effect and mechanisms of state boredom on consumers’ livestreaming addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 826121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.826121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar